在测试和操作中解决需求发现问题

R. Lutz, Ines Carmen Mikulski
{"title":"在测试和操作中解决需求发现问题","authors":"R. Lutz, Ines Carmen Mikulski","doi":"10.1109/ICRE.2003.1232735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We describe the results of an investigation into requirements discovery during testing and operations. Requirements discovery includes both new requirements and new knowledge regarding existing requirements. Analysis of anomaly reports shows that many of the anomalies that occur during these phases involve requirements discovery. Previous work identified four common mechanisms for requirements discovery and resolution during testing. The results reported here extend that work in two ways: (1) to show that very similar requirements-discovery mechanisms are at work in both testing and operations, and (2) to evaluate the requirements-discovery mechanisms against experience with seven additional systems. We discuss the consequences of these classifications and results in terms of reducing requirements-based defects in critical, embedded systems.","PeriodicalId":243621,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2003.","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resolving requirements discovery in testing and operations\",\"authors\":\"R. Lutz, Ines Carmen Mikulski\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICRE.2003.1232735\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We describe the results of an investigation into requirements discovery during testing and operations. Requirements discovery includes both new requirements and new knowledge regarding existing requirements. Analysis of anomaly reports shows that many of the anomalies that occur during these phases involve requirements discovery. Previous work identified four common mechanisms for requirements discovery and resolution during testing. The results reported here extend that work in two ways: (1) to show that very similar requirements-discovery mechanisms are at work in both testing and operations, and (2) to evaluate the requirements-discovery mechanisms against experience with seven additional systems. We discuss the consequences of these classifications and results in terms of reducing requirements-based defects in critical, embedded systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":243621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2003.\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2003.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.2003.1232735\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 11th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, 2003.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRE.2003.1232735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

我们描述了在测试和操作期间对需求发现进行调查的结果。需求发现包括新需求和关于现有需求的新知识。对异常报告的分析表明,在这些阶段中发生的许多异常都涉及到需求发现。之前的工作确定了测试期间需求发现和解决的四种常见机制。这里报告的结果以两种方式扩展了这项工作:(1)显示非常相似的需求发现机制在测试和操作中都起作用,(2)根据七个附加系统的经验评估需求发现机制。我们从减少关键嵌入式系统中基于需求的缺陷的角度来讨论这些分类的结果和结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resolving requirements discovery in testing and operations
We describe the results of an investigation into requirements discovery during testing and operations. Requirements discovery includes both new requirements and new knowledge regarding existing requirements. Analysis of anomaly reports shows that many of the anomalies that occur during these phases involve requirements discovery. Previous work identified four common mechanisms for requirements discovery and resolution during testing. The results reported here extend that work in two ways: (1) to show that very similar requirements-discovery mechanisms are at work in both testing and operations, and (2) to evaluate the requirements-discovery mechanisms against experience with seven additional systems. We discuss the consequences of these classifications and results in terms of reducing requirements-based defects in critical, embedded systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信