普金对科学融合的理性批判:促进民族主义研究的塔伯特和驯化

M. Iqbal
{"title":"普金对科学融合的理性批判:促进民族主义研究的塔伯特和驯化","authors":"M. Iqbal","doi":"10.29300/JPKTH.V9I2.3586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the scientific design that combines Islam with a national perspective, which the author calls the Tabot’s scientific . Tabot's scientific design is Islam juxtaposed with local wisdom, to produce a wasathiyah (moderate) Islam. So far, the scientific design at PTKIN only reinforces the scientific dichotomy between science and religion. Such as the science of Spider Web, Tree of Science, Twin Tower and others, all carry the integration of religion and science. Islam itself does not recognize this scientific separation. Using library research (literature study), which is a method that is carried out by collecting data and information from books and writings that are related to the research object which is discussed descriptively-analytic through philosophical studies with a qualitative-rationalistic approach . The results of this study are: first, religion and national locality are like two sides of a coin that cannot be separated. Religion does not exist in a cultural vacuum. Rather, religion always includes two inseparable but distinguishable entities, namely normativity and historicity. Second, it is necessary to ground (domestication), downstream science, both religion and science technology according to the needs of the Indonesian people. So far, the science on campus has been more on the ceiling, in the ivory tower rather than manifesting in beneficial social and technological attitudes. Indonesian scientists are more expert in discourse rather than manifesting in praxis and works.Keywords:  Criticism, Science, Tabot, Integration, Domestification.","PeriodicalId":324865,"journal":{"name":"El-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kritik Nalar Integrasi Keilmuan dI PTKIN: Mengusung Keilmuan Tabot dan Domestifikasi Studi Keislaman Berwawasan Kebangsaan\",\"authors\":\"M. Iqbal\",\"doi\":\"10.29300/JPKTH.V9I2.3586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the scientific design that combines Islam with a national perspective, which the author calls the Tabot’s scientific . Tabot's scientific design is Islam juxtaposed with local wisdom, to produce a wasathiyah (moderate) Islam. So far, the scientific design at PTKIN only reinforces the scientific dichotomy between science and religion. Such as the science of Spider Web, Tree of Science, Twin Tower and others, all carry the integration of religion and science. Islam itself does not recognize this scientific separation. Using library research (literature study), which is a method that is carried out by collecting data and information from books and writings that are related to the research object which is discussed descriptively-analytic through philosophical studies with a qualitative-rationalistic approach . The results of this study are: first, religion and national locality are like two sides of a coin that cannot be separated. Religion does not exist in a cultural vacuum. Rather, religion always includes two inseparable but distinguishable entities, namely normativity and historicity. Second, it is necessary to ground (domestication), downstream science, both religion and science technology according to the needs of the Indonesian people. So far, the science on campus has been more on the ceiling, in the ivory tower rather than manifesting in beneficial social and technological attitudes. Indonesian scientists are more expert in discourse rather than manifesting in praxis and works.Keywords:  Criticism, Science, Tabot, Integration, Domestification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":324865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"El-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"El-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29300/JPKTH.V9I2.3586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"El-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29300/JPKTH.V9I2.3586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了伊斯兰教与民族视角相结合的科学设计,作者称之为塔伯特的科学设计。Tabot的科学设计是将伊斯兰教与当地智慧并置,以产生wasathiyah(温和的)伊斯兰教。到目前为止,PTKIN的科学设计只是强化了科学与宗教之间的科学二分法。如《蜘蛛网》、《科学之树》、《双塔》等,都承载着宗教与科学的融合。伊斯兰教本身不承认这种科学的分离。使用图书馆研究(文献研究),这是一种通过从与研究对象相关的书籍和著作中收集数据和信息来进行的方法,通过定性理性主义方法的哲学研究进行描述性分析。本研究的结果是:第一,宗教与民族地方性就像一枚硬币的两面,不可分割。宗教不是存在于文化真空中。相反,宗教总是包括两个不可分割但可区分的实体,即规范性和历史性。二是要接地(驯化),下游科学,根据印尼人民的需要,既有宗教又有科学技术。到目前为止,校园里的科学更多的是在天花板上,在象牙塔里,而不是在有益的社会和技术态度中表现出来。印尼科学家更擅长于话语,而不是在实践和作品中表现出来。关键词:批判,科学,禁忌,整合,驯化
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Kritik Nalar Integrasi Keilmuan dI PTKIN: Mengusung Keilmuan Tabot dan Domestifikasi Studi Keislaman Berwawasan Kebangsaan
This paper examines the scientific design that combines Islam with a national perspective, which the author calls the Tabot’s scientific . Tabot's scientific design is Islam juxtaposed with local wisdom, to produce a wasathiyah (moderate) Islam. So far, the scientific design at PTKIN only reinforces the scientific dichotomy between science and religion. Such as the science of Spider Web, Tree of Science, Twin Tower and others, all carry the integration of religion and science. Islam itself does not recognize this scientific separation. Using library research (literature study), which is a method that is carried out by collecting data and information from books and writings that are related to the research object which is discussed descriptively-analytic through philosophical studies with a qualitative-rationalistic approach . The results of this study are: first, religion and national locality are like two sides of a coin that cannot be separated. Religion does not exist in a cultural vacuum. Rather, religion always includes two inseparable but distinguishable entities, namely normativity and historicity. Second, it is necessary to ground (domestication), downstream science, both religion and science technology according to the needs of the Indonesian people. So far, the science on campus has been more on the ceiling, in the ivory tower rather than manifesting in beneficial social and technological attitudes. Indonesian scientists are more expert in discourse rather than manifesting in praxis and works.Keywords:  Criticism, Science, Tabot, Integration, Domestification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信