不落下一个分类器:基于置信度信息的RBF SVM分类器易受图像提取攻击的深入研究

Michael R. Clark, Peter Swartz, Andrew Alten, Raed M. Salih
{"title":"不落下一个分类器:基于置信度信息的RBF SVM分类器易受图像提取攻击的深入研究","authors":"Michael R. Clark, Peter Swartz, Andrew Alten, Raed M. Salih","doi":"10.1109/CogMI50398.2020.00037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Training image extraction attacks attempt to reverse engineer training images from an already trained machine learning model. Such attacks are concerning because training data can often be sensitive in nature. Recent research has shown that extracting training images is generally much harder than model inversion, which attempts to duplicate the functionality of the model. In this paper, we correct common misperceptions about image extraction attacks and develop a deep understanding ofwhy some trained models are vulnerable to ourattack while others are not. In particular, we use the RBFSVMclassifier to show that we can extract individual training images from models trained on thousands of images., which refutes the notion that these attacks can only extract an “average” of each class. We also show that increasing diversity of the training data set leads to more successful attacks. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to show semantically meaningful images extracted from the RBF SVM classifier.","PeriodicalId":360326,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE Second International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Classifier Left Behind: An In-depth Study of the RBF SVM Classifier's Vulnerability to Image Extraction Attacks via Confidence Information Exploitation\",\"authors\":\"Michael R. Clark, Peter Swartz, Andrew Alten, Raed M. Salih\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CogMI50398.2020.00037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Training image extraction attacks attempt to reverse engineer training images from an already trained machine learning model. Such attacks are concerning because training data can often be sensitive in nature. Recent research has shown that extracting training images is generally much harder than model inversion, which attempts to duplicate the functionality of the model. In this paper, we correct common misperceptions about image extraction attacks and develop a deep understanding ofwhy some trained models are vulnerable to ourattack while others are not. In particular, we use the RBFSVMclassifier to show that we can extract individual training images from models trained on thousands of images., which refutes the notion that these attacks can only extract an “average” of each class. We also show that increasing diversity of the training data set leads to more successful attacks. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to show semantically meaningful images extracted from the RBF SVM classifier.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 IEEE Second International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 IEEE Second International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CogMI50398.2020.00037\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE Second International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence (CogMI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CogMI50398.2020.00037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

训练图像提取攻击试图从已经训练好的机器学习模型中对训练图像进行逆向工程。这类攻击令人担忧,因为训练数据本质上往往是敏感的。最近的研究表明,提取训练图像通常比模型反演困难得多,模型反演试图复制模型的功能。在本文中,我们纠正了关于图像提取攻击的常见误解,并深入理解了为什么一些训练模型容易受到我们的攻击,而另一些则不会。特别是,我们使用rbfsvm分类器来表明我们可以从数千张图像上训练的模型中提取单个训练图像。,这驳斥了这些攻击只能提取每个类的“平均值”的观点。我们还表明,训练数据集的多样性增加会导致更成功的攻击。据我们所知,我们的工作是第一个展示从RBF SVM分类器中提取的语义有意义的图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Classifier Left Behind: An In-depth Study of the RBF SVM Classifier's Vulnerability to Image Extraction Attacks via Confidence Information Exploitation
Training image extraction attacks attempt to reverse engineer training images from an already trained machine learning model. Such attacks are concerning because training data can often be sensitive in nature. Recent research has shown that extracting training images is generally much harder than model inversion, which attempts to duplicate the functionality of the model. In this paper, we correct common misperceptions about image extraction attacks and develop a deep understanding ofwhy some trained models are vulnerable to ourattack while others are not. In particular, we use the RBFSVMclassifier to show that we can extract individual training images from models trained on thousands of images., which refutes the notion that these attacks can only extract an “average” of each class. We also show that increasing diversity of the training data set leads to more successful attacks. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to show semantically meaningful images extracted from the RBF SVM classifier.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信