我们给他,并将古兰经的书面原件,现金阅读

Abdulrehman Mohammad Spendari
{"title":"我们给他,并将古兰经的书面原件,现金阅读","authors":"Abdulrehman Mohammad Spendari","doi":"10.33102/jmqs.v18i1.357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to investigate Theodor NÖldeke’s claim in his book entitled History of the Qur’an that the Qur’an has a biblical origin. This study used the thematic approach in examining the data collected from texts, ideas, and other qualitative data. Hence, NÖldeke’s sayings that are directly related to the topic were collected, and the analytical and critical approaches were used on the texts. The researcher applied the internal criticism method to NÖldeke’s contradictory sayings in his book. This article has two major findings: (1) NÖldeke deems Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the author of the Qur’an and (2) consequently, Nöldeke believes that the Prophet (PBUH) derived the Qur’anic text from the views of the people of the book who inhabited the Arab peninsula. Thus, NÖldeke associates the origin of any aspects of the Qur’an or revelations to the Aramics and the Hebrews, among others. NÖldeke uses this assocation as a basis to claim that the Qur’an is of the biblical origin, and hence, Islam is a derivative form of Christianity. He interprets the originality of all commonalities among the religions to the Jews, neglecting that all these commonalities originate from the same source. NÖldeke makes numerous attempts to prove that the Qur’an has a biblical heritage while simultaneously contradicting himself. He negates his statements by indicting that the Prophet (PBUH) never came into contact with the holy books of the Jews and the Christians. Finally, the article shows that even though NÖldeke’s book is acclaimed, it is in fact full of contradictions.","PeriodicalId":276672,"journal":{"name":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","volume":"107 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"نولدكه ودعوى الأصل الكتابي للقرآن الكريم، قراءة نقدية\",\"authors\":\"Abdulrehman Mohammad Spendari\",\"doi\":\"10.33102/jmqs.v18i1.357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to investigate Theodor NÖldeke’s claim in his book entitled History of the Qur’an that the Qur’an has a biblical origin. This study used the thematic approach in examining the data collected from texts, ideas, and other qualitative data. Hence, NÖldeke’s sayings that are directly related to the topic were collected, and the analytical and critical approaches were used on the texts. The researcher applied the internal criticism method to NÖldeke’s contradictory sayings in his book. This article has two major findings: (1) NÖldeke deems Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the author of the Qur’an and (2) consequently, Nöldeke believes that the Prophet (PBUH) derived the Qur’anic text from the views of the people of the book who inhabited the Arab peninsula. Thus, NÖldeke associates the origin of any aspects of the Qur’an or revelations to the Aramics and the Hebrews, among others. NÖldeke uses this assocation as a basis to claim that the Qur’an is of the biblical origin, and hence, Islam is a derivative form of Christianity. He interprets the originality of all commonalities among the religions to the Jews, neglecting that all these commonalities originate from the same source. NÖldeke makes numerous attempts to prove that the Qur’an has a biblical heritage while simultaneously contradicting himself. He negates his statements by indicting that the Prophet (PBUH) never came into contact with the holy books of the Jews and the Christians. Finally, the article shows that even though NÖldeke’s book is acclaimed, it is in fact full of contradictions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":276672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah\",\"volume\":\"107 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v18i1.357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maʿālim al-Qurʾān wa al-Sunnah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33102/jmqs.v18i1.357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在探讨Theodor NÖldeke在其著作《古兰经的历史》中提出的古兰经起源于圣经的观点。本研究使用主题方法来检查从文本、观点和其他定性数据中收集的数据。因此,收集了与主题直接相关的NÖldeke语录,并对文本使用了分析和批判方法。研究人员对书中NÖldeke的矛盾言论运用了内部批评的方法。这篇文章有两个主要发现:(1)NÖldeke认为先知穆罕默德(PBUH)是《古兰经》的作者;(2)因此,Nöldeke认为先知穆罕默德(PBUH)是从居住在阿拉伯半岛的人们的观点中得出《古兰经》文本的。因此,NÖldeke将古兰经或启示的任何方面的起源与亚兰人和希伯来人等联系起来。NÖldeke使用这种联系作为基础,声称古兰经是圣经的起源,因此,伊斯兰教是基督教的衍生形式。他向犹太人解释了宗教中所有共性的原创性,却忽略了所有这些共性都来自同一个源头。NÖldeke做了很多尝试来证明古兰经有圣经的遗产,同时又自相矛盾。他通过指控先知(愿主福安之)从未接触过犹太人和基督徒的圣书来否定他的陈述。最后,文章表明,尽管NÖldeke的书受到好评,但它实际上充满了矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
نولدكه ودعوى الأصل الكتابي للقرآن الكريم، قراءة نقدية
This article aims to investigate Theodor NÖldeke’s claim in his book entitled History of the Qur’an that the Qur’an has a biblical origin. This study used the thematic approach in examining the data collected from texts, ideas, and other qualitative data. Hence, NÖldeke’s sayings that are directly related to the topic were collected, and the analytical and critical approaches were used on the texts. The researcher applied the internal criticism method to NÖldeke’s contradictory sayings in his book. This article has two major findings: (1) NÖldeke deems Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) as the author of the Qur’an and (2) consequently, Nöldeke believes that the Prophet (PBUH) derived the Qur’anic text from the views of the people of the book who inhabited the Arab peninsula. Thus, NÖldeke associates the origin of any aspects of the Qur’an or revelations to the Aramics and the Hebrews, among others. NÖldeke uses this assocation as a basis to claim that the Qur’an is of the biblical origin, and hence, Islam is a derivative form of Christianity. He interprets the originality of all commonalities among the religions to the Jews, neglecting that all these commonalities originate from the same source. NÖldeke makes numerous attempts to prove that the Qur’an has a biblical heritage while simultaneously contradicting himself. He negates his statements by indicting that the Prophet (PBUH) never came into contact with the holy books of the Jews and the Christians. Finally, the article shows that even though NÖldeke’s book is acclaimed, it is in fact full of contradictions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信