[极低体重新生儿呼吸缺陷的呼吸生理信号评估]。

Padiatrie und Grenzgebiete Pub Date : 1991-01-01
G Schmalisch, R R Wauer, S Gebhard, P Mundt
{"title":"[极低体重新生儿呼吸缺陷的呼吸生理信号评估]。","authors":"G Schmalisch,&nbsp;R R Wauer,&nbsp;S Gebhard,&nbsp;P Mundt","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>1. Lung function tests in newborn babies breathing spontaneously were performed commonly using a pneumotachometer to measure the tidal volume and an esophageal catheter to measure the transpulmonary pressure changes. 2. The quality of the measured signals depends on the breath-to-breath variability of the signals as well as on the frequency of different artifacts and disturbances due to physiological interferences. 3. The evaluation of the signals in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress is often difficult due to the irregular pattern of respiration, the reduced signal-noise-ratio and the high number of artifacts. 4. The subjective assessment of the quality of 115 records of respiratory signals has shown that 54% of all records can be evaluated easily, in 40.8% the evaluation was difficult and in 5.2% an evaluation was not possible. 5. The qualitative analysis of respiratory signals shows that in this age group the computer-aided signal evaluation requires a new view in the detection and elimination of artifacts as well as in the calculation of characteristic results from a sufficient number of evaluated breathing cycles.</p>","PeriodicalId":19624,"journal":{"name":"Padiatrie und Grenzgebiete","volume":"30 5","pages":"369-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Assessment of respiratory physiology signals in very low-weight newborn infant with respiratory deficiency].\",\"authors\":\"G Schmalisch,&nbsp;R R Wauer,&nbsp;S Gebhard,&nbsp;P Mundt\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>1. Lung function tests in newborn babies breathing spontaneously were performed commonly using a pneumotachometer to measure the tidal volume and an esophageal catheter to measure the transpulmonary pressure changes. 2. The quality of the measured signals depends on the breath-to-breath variability of the signals as well as on the frequency of different artifacts and disturbances due to physiological interferences. 3. The evaluation of the signals in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress is often difficult due to the irregular pattern of respiration, the reduced signal-noise-ratio and the high number of artifacts. 4. The subjective assessment of the quality of 115 records of respiratory signals has shown that 54% of all records can be evaluated easily, in 40.8% the evaluation was difficult and in 5.2% an evaluation was not possible. 5. The qualitative analysis of respiratory signals shows that in this age group the computer-aided signal evaluation requires a new view in the detection and elimination of artifacts as well as in the calculation of characteristic results from a sufficient number of evaluated breathing cycles.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Padiatrie und Grenzgebiete\",\"volume\":\"30 5\",\"pages\":\"369-80\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Padiatrie und Grenzgebiete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Padiatrie und Grenzgebiete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1. 对自主呼吸的新生儿进行肺功能测试,一般采用气压计测量潮气量,食管导管测量肺内压变化。2. 测量信号的质量取决于信号的呼吸变异性,以及由于生理干扰而产生的不同伪影和干扰的频率。3.由于呼吸模式不规则、信噪比降低和大量伪影,对极低出生体重婴儿呼吸窘迫信号的评估往往很困难。4. 对115份呼吸信号记录进行主观评价,结果表明:易评价的占54%,难评价的占40.8%,不能评价的占5.2%。5. 呼吸信号的定性分析表明,在这一年龄组中,计算机辅助信号评估需要在检测和消除伪影以及从足够数量的评估呼吸周期中计算特征结果方面有新的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Assessment of respiratory physiology signals in very low-weight newborn infant with respiratory deficiency].

1. Lung function tests in newborn babies breathing spontaneously were performed commonly using a pneumotachometer to measure the tidal volume and an esophageal catheter to measure the transpulmonary pressure changes. 2. The quality of the measured signals depends on the breath-to-breath variability of the signals as well as on the frequency of different artifacts and disturbances due to physiological interferences. 3. The evaluation of the signals in very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress is often difficult due to the irregular pattern of respiration, the reduced signal-noise-ratio and the high number of artifacts. 4. The subjective assessment of the quality of 115 records of respiratory signals has shown that 54% of all records can be evaluated easily, in 40.8% the evaluation was difficult and in 5.2% an evaluation was not possible. 5. The qualitative analysis of respiratory signals shows that in this age group the computer-aided signal evaluation requires a new view in the detection and elimination of artifacts as well as in the calculation of characteristic results from a sufficient number of evaluated breathing cycles.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信