古俄罗斯文士认为疾病是人与上帝交流的空间(公元前11 - 13世纪)。

Natalia Pelezneva
{"title":"古俄罗斯文士认为疾病是人与上帝交流的空间(公元前11 - 13世纪)。","authors":"Natalia Pelezneva","doi":"10.15382/sturii2022105.11-30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on Old Russian literary sources of 11-13th cc., this paper examines how illness was perceived in the Middle Ages. This research concentrates on a certain perception type (“communication illness”) and describes its distinctive features. This type of sickness integrates several versions of the medieval illness etiology, including “illness as a punishment” and “illness as a trial”. The author suggests that an Old Russian scribe considered “communication illness” as a message from God. The circumstances of the illness allowed the sick person to recognize the situation of “communication” and decipher the message. Some details like visions or the absence of “sickness agents” could help to recognize this type of illness. The research distinguishes several subtypes of “communication illness”, which are called “sign illness”, “punishment illness”, “inborn illness” and “deathbed illness”. The last one could be perceived as an ascetic practice available to both clergy and laity. Scribes condemned any attempt to feign a “communication illness”, this was viewed as an act of sacrilege. The message of “communication illness” was more often positive, it was perceived as a sign of God’s favor to the sick person. Biblical quotations used in descriptions of the illness show that “communication illness” was closely related to the virtue of patience. The conclusions of this research make it possible to correct the present conception that Old Russian scribes prohibited any attempts to apply methods of classical (Hippocratic) medicine. The author believes that scribes condemned Hippocratic methods exclusively in the situations of “communication illness”, in other cases of sickness they had no objection to a classical approach to the treatment.","PeriodicalId":170812,"journal":{"name":"St.Tikhons' University Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illness as a space of communication between man and God as perceived by the Old Russian scribe (11–13th cc.)\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Pelezneva\",\"doi\":\"10.15382/sturii2022105.11-30\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on Old Russian literary sources of 11-13th cc., this paper examines how illness was perceived in the Middle Ages. This research concentrates on a certain perception type (“communication illness”) and describes its distinctive features. This type of sickness integrates several versions of the medieval illness etiology, including “illness as a punishment” and “illness as a trial”. The author suggests that an Old Russian scribe considered “communication illness” as a message from God. The circumstances of the illness allowed the sick person to recognize the situation of “communication” and decipher the message. Some details like visions or the absence of “sickness agents” could help to recognize this type of illness. The research distinguishes several subtypes of “communication illness”, which are called “sign illness”, “punishment illness”, “inborn illness” and “deathbed illness”. The last one could be perceived as an ascetic practice available to both clergy and laity. Scribes condemned any attempt to feign a “communication illness”, this was viewed as an act of sacrilege. The message of “communication illness” was more often positive, it was perceived as a sign of God’s favor to the sick person. Biblical quotations used in descriptions of the illness show that “communication illness” was closely related to the virtue of patience. The conclusions of this research make it possible to correct the present conception that Old Russian scribes prohibited any attempts to apply methods of classical (Hippocratic) medicine. The author believes that scribes condemned Hippocratic methods exclusively in the situations of “communication illness”, in other cases of sickness they had no objection to a classical approach to the treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"St.Tikhons' University Review\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"St.Tikhons' University Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturii2022105.11-30\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St.Tikhons' University Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturii2022105.11-30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以公元前11-13世纪的古俄罗斯文学资料为基础,考察了中世纪人们是如何看待疾病的。本研究集中于某一感知类型(“沟通疾病”),并描述其鲜明特征。这种类型的疾病整合了中世纪疾病病因学的几个版本,包括“疾病作为惩罚”和“疾病作为审判”。作者认为,一位古俄罗斯文士认为“沟通疾病”是来自上帝的信息。疾病的环境允许病人认识到“沟通”的情况,并破译信息。一些细节,如幻觉或“致病因子”的缺失,可以帮助识别这类疾病。该研究将“沟通疾病”分为“标志疾病”、“惩罚疾病”、“先天疾病”和“临终疾病”等几种亚型。最后一种可以被认为是僧侣和俗人都可以进行的苦行。抄写员谴责任何假装“沟通疾病”的企图,这被视为一种亵渎行为。“沟通疾病”的信息往往是积极的,它被认为是上帝眷顾病人的标志。圣经中对这种疾病的描述表明,“沟通疾病”与耐心的美德密切相关。这项研究的结论有可能纠正目前的观念,即古俄罗斯文士禁止任何尝试应用古典(希波克拉底)医学的方法。作者认为,文士只在“交流疾病”的情况下谴责希波克拉底方法,在其他疾病的情况下,他们不反对传统的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Illness as a space of communication between man and God as perceived by the Old Russian scribe (11–13th cc.)
Based on Old Russian literary sources of 11-13th cc., this paper examines how illness was perceived in the Middle Ages. This research concentrates on a certain perception type (“communication illness”) and describes its distinctive features. This type of sickness integrates several versions of the medieval illness etiology, including “illness as a punishment” and “illness as a trial”. The author suggests that an Old Russian scribe considered “communication illness” as a message from God. The circumstances of the illness allowed the sick person to recognize the situation of “communication” and decipher the message. Some details like visions or the absence of “sickness agents” could help to recognize this type of illness. The research distinguishes several subtypes of “communication illness”, which are called “sign illness”, “punishment illness”, “inborn illness” and “deathbed illness”. The last one could be perceived as an ascetic practice available to both clergy and laity. Scribes condemned any attempt to feign a “communication illness”, this was viewed as an act of sacrilege. The message of “communication illness” was more often positive, it was perceived as a sign of God’s favor to the sick person. Biblical quotations used in descriptions of the illness show that “communication illness” was closely related to the virtue of patience. The conclusions of this research make it possible to correct the present conception that Old Russian scribes prohibited any attempts to apply methods of classical (Hippocratic) medicine. The author believes that scribes condemned Hippocratic methods exclusively in the situations of “communication illness”, in other cases of sickness they had no objection to a classical approach to the treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信