保乳治疗适应症的改变:可手术乳腺癌患者适合保乳的比例。

The Netherlands journal of surgery Pub Date : 1991-08-01
M J Hooning, J A van Dongen, G Went
{"title":"保乳治疗适应症的改变:可手术乳腺癌患者适合保乳的比例。","authors":"M J Hooning,&nbsp;J A van Dongen,&nbsp;G Went","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The changes in indication for breast conserving therapy and the proportion of operable stage-I and stage-II breast cancers suitable for breast conserving therapy were studied in three time periods. The percentage of patients treated with breast conserving therapy gradually increased through the years: 77/199 (39%) in 1980-1981, 122/245 (50%) in 1985-1987, and 168/305 (55%) in 1987-1989. Using the actual selection criteria more patients might have been candidates for breast conserving therapy: 69, 64 and 59 per cent respectively. In the period 1987-1989 almost all patients who were considered good candidates for breast conserving therapy had a breast sparing procedure. Indications widened in relation to age limit (less than or equal to 70 years) and, over the years, more factors became relative contra-indications: very young age, presence of extensive intra-ductal component, data from mammography (multicentricity, size and aspect of the lesion). About 40 per cent of the patients were no appropriate candidates for breast conserving therapy. This percentage would be higher when operable stage-III patients would have been included.</p>","PeriodicalId":77640,"journal":{"name":"The Netherlands journal of surgery","volume":"43 4","pages":"102-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Changing indications for breast conserving therapy: proportion of patients with operable breast cancer suitable for breast conservation.\",\"authors\":\"M J Hooning,&nbsp;J A van Dongen,&nbsp;G Went\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The changes in indication for breast conserving therapy and the proportion of operable stage-I and stage-II breast cancers suitable for breast conserving therapy were studied in three time periods. The percentage of patients treated with breast conserving therapy gradually increased through the years: 77/199 (39%) in 1980-1981, 122/245 (50%) in 1985-1987, and 168/305 (55%) in 1987-1989. Using the actual selection criteria more patients might have been candidates for breast conserving therapy: 69, 64 and 59 per cent respectively. In the period 1987-1989 almost all patients who were considered good candidates for breast conserving therapy had a breast sparing procedure. Indications widened in relation to age limit (less than or equal to 70 years) and, over the years, more factors became relative contra-indications: very young age, presence of extensive intra-ductal component, data from mammography (multicentricity, size and aspect of the lesion). About 40 per cent of the patients were no appropriate candidates for breast conserving therapy. This percentage would be higher when operable stage-III patients would have been included.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Netherlands journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"43 4\",\"pages\":\"102-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Netherlands journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Netherlands journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究三个时期保乳治疗适应症的变化以及适合保乳治疗的可手术一期和二期乳腺癌的比例。采用保乳治疗的患者比例逐年递增:1980-1981年为77/199(39%),1985-1987年为122/245(50%),1987-1989年为168/305(55%)。使用实际的选择标准,更多的患者可能是保乳治疗的候选者:分别为69%,64%和59%。在1987-1989年期间,几乎所有被认为适合保乳治疗的患者都进行了保乳手术。随着年龄限制(小于或等于70岁)适应症的扩大,多年来,更多的因素成为相对禁忌症:非常年轻,存在广泛的导管内成分,乳房x光检查数据(多中心性,病变的大小和方面)。约40%的患者不适合进行保乳治疗。如果包括可手术的iii期患者,这一比例会更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Changing indications for breast conserving therapy: proportion of patients with operable breast cancer suitable for breast conservation.

The changes in indication for breast conserving therapy and the proportion of operable stage-I and stage-II breast cancers suitable for breast conserving therapy were studied in three time periods. The percentage of patients treated with breast conserving therapy gradually increased through the years: 77/199 (39%) in 1980-1981, 122/245 (50%) in 1985-1987, and 168/305 (55%) in 1987-1989. Using the actual selection criteria more patients might have been candidates for breast conserving therapy: 69, 64 and 59 per cent respectively. In the period 1987-1989 almost all patients who were considered good candidates for breast conserving therapy had a breast sparing procedure. Indications widened in relation to age limit (less than or equal to 70 years) and, over the years, more factors became relative contra-indications: very young age, presence of extensive intra-ductal component, data from mammography (multicentricity, size and aspect of the lesion). About 40 per cent of the patients were no appropriate candidates for breast conserving therapy. This percentage would be higher when operable stage-III patients would have been included.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信