药典无菌检验:抽样的统计局限性

Tim Sandle
{"title":"药典无菌检验:抽样的统计局限性","authors":"Tim Sandle","doi":"10.37521/ejpps.28203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For aseptically filled products, as well as for many terminally filled products, the sterility test is a mandatory product release test. It is, however, statistically poor at detecting anything other than gross contamination (this limitation has been addressed in a number of studies (1)). This limitation relates to the few numbers of articles tested (2). For batches in excess of 500 filled containers, the pharmacopeia only require that twenty samples are included in the sterility test set. This sample size appears to have been set arbitrarily, and it does not provide a statistically significant population with which to estimate sterility (3). Although it is unclear how this sample size was derived, the number is grounded, in part, through the sterility test being a destructive test (each article tested via the sterility test is not available for the patient) and therefore to maximise the availability of the batch by using as few units as possible. \n\nIt remains, nonetheless, that the sample size of 20 provides no confidence that the sterility of a batch of pharmaceutical items has not been compromised. \n\nIn relation to sampling, limitations not only apply to the low number of samples tested but also to the difficulties in selecting a sample representative of all significant events during batch filling (4). This is important because contamination is unlikely to be uniformly distributed throughout the batch and thus random sampling cannot detect contamination with absolute certainty. This is of particular importance with aseptic filling where batch specific events can occur. It is possible that certain events can be captured, such as interventions into the aseptic core, where the vials exposed at the time of the activity can be incorporated into the sterility test set (notwithstanding that all events cannot be captured in this way).","PeriodicalId":300408,"journal":{"name":"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacopeial sterility test: The statistical limitations of sampling\",\"authors\":\"Tim Sandle\",\"doi\":\"10.37521/ejpps.28203\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For aseptically filled products, as well as for many terminally filled products, the sterility test is a mandatory product release test. It is, however, statistically poor at detecting anything other than gross contamination (this limitation has been addressed in a number of studies (1)). This limitation relates to the few numbers of articles tested (2). For batches in excess of 500 filled containers, the pharmacopeia only require that twenty samples are included in the sterility test set. This sample size appears to have been set arbitrarily, and it does not provide a statistically significant population with which to estimate sterility (3). Although it is unclear how this sample size was derived, the number is grounded, in part, through the sterility test being a destructive test (each article tested via the sterility test is not available for the patient) and therefore to maximise the availability of the batch by using as few units as possible. \\n\\nIt remains, nonetheless, that the sample size of 20 provides no confidence that the sterility of a batch of pharmaceutical items has not been compromised. \\n\\nIn relation to sampling, limitations not only apply to the low number of samples tested but also to the difficulties in selecting a sample representative of all significant events during batch filling (4). This is important because contamination is unlikely to be uniformly distributed throughout the batch and thus random sampling cannot detect contamination with absolute certainty. This is of particular importance with aseptic filling where batch specific events can occur. It is possible that certain events can be captured, such as interventions into the aseptic core, where the vials exposed at the time of the activity can be incorporated into the sterility test set (notwithstanding that all events cannot be captured in this way).\",\"PeriodicalId\":300408,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37521/ejpps.28203\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJPPS EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PARENTERAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37521/ejpps.28203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于无菌灌装产品,以及许多终端灌装产品,无菌检验是强制性的产品放行检验。然而,在统计上,它在检测严重污染以外的任何东西方面都很差(这个限制已经在许多研究中得到解决(1))。这一限制涉及到测试的物品数量较少(2)。对于超过500个灌装容器的批次,药典只要求在无菌测试集中包含20个样品。这个样本量似乎是任意设置的,它没有提供一个统计上显著的群体来估计无菌性(3)。虽然不清楚这个样本量是如何得出的,但这个数字部分是基于无菌试验是一种破坏性试验(通过无菌试验检测的每一件物品都不能用于患者),因此通过使用尽可能少的单位来最大化批次的可用性。尽管如此,20个样本量仍然不能保证一批药品的无菌性没有受到损害。与抽样有关,限制不仅适用于测试样品数量少,而且也适用于在批次填充期间选择代表所有重要事件的样品的困难(4)。这很重要,因为污染不可能在整个批次中均匀分布,因此随机抽样不能绝对确定地检测污染。这对于可能发生批特定事件的无菌灌装尤其重要。有可能捕获某些事件,例如对无菌堆芯的干预,在活动时暴露的小瓶可以纳入无菌试验集(尽管不能以这种方式捕获所有事件)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pharmacopeial sterility test: The statistical limitations of sampling
For aseptically filled products, as well as for many terminally filled products, the sterility test is a mandatory product release test. It is, however, statistically poor at detecting anything other than gross contamination (this limitation has been addressed in a number of studies (1)). This limitation relates to the few numbers of articles tested (2). For batches in excess of 500 filled containers, the pharmacopeia only require that twenty samples are included in the sterility test set. This sample size appears to have been set arbitrarily, and it does not provide a statistically significant population with which to estimate sterility (3). Although it is unclear how this sample size was derived, the number is grounded, in part, through the sterility test being a destructive test (each article tested via the sterility test is not available for the patient) and therefore to maximise the availability of the batch by using as few units as possible. It remains, nonetheless, that the sample size of 20 provides no confidence that the sterility of a batch of pharmaceutical items has not been compromised. In relation to sampling, limitations not only apply to the low number of samples tested but also to the difficulties in selecting a sample representative of all significant events during batch filling (4). This is important because contamination is unlikely to be uniformly distributed throughout the batch and thus random sampling cannot detect contamination with absolute certainty. This is of particular importance with aseptic filling where batch specific events can occur. It is possible that certain events can be captured, such as interventions into the aseptic core, where the vials exposed at the time of the activity can be incorporated into the sterility test set (notwithstanding that all events cannot be captured in this way).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信