{"title":"一种用于测量抗感觉性药物对大鼠运动功能影响的改良轮轮程序","authors":"Steven M. Cartmell, Linda Gelgor, Duncan Mitchell","doi":"10.1016/0160-5402(91)90063-B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tests of putative antinociceptive agents that rely on a motor response of an experimental animal to a noxious stimulus will give false positive results, and may be unethical, if the agent compromises motor function. We report a procedure for measuring potential effects of antinociceptive agents on motor function in the trained rat, using an 80 mm diameter rotarod.</p><p>Rats were selected for ability to exercise on the rotarod and trained to increasing speeds. In test trials, we measured the time that trained rats could stay on the rod, rotating at 25 rpm, with a cut off at 60 min. Morphine administration decreased rotarod performance significantly at doses of 5.0 mg/kg (<em>P</em> < 0.05, <em>n</em> = 10) and 7.5 mg/kg (<em>P</em> < 0.005, <em>n</em> = 10). We also assessed the response to a noxious thermal stimulus by measuring tail flick latency following tail immersion in water at 49°C. A significant dose-dependent increase in tail flick latency was found for dosages of morphine between 2.5 mg/kg and 7.5 mg/kg (<em>P</em> < 0.005, <em>n</em> = 10).</p><p>Our rotarod procedure, which incorporates selection, training, and a 60 min trial, provides a sensitive and consistent means of assessing motor function. Our results, implying that morphine indeed compromises motor function in rats at doses at which it is antinociceptive, confirm the necessity for investigating the motor effects of any putative antinociceptive agent.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacological methods","volume":"26 2","pages":"Pages 149-159"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-5402(91)90063-B","citationCount":"59","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A revised rotarod procedure for measuring the effect of antinociceptive drugs on motor function in the rat\",\"authors\":\"Steven M. Cartmell, Linda Gelgor, Duncan Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0160-5402(91)90063-B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Tests of putative antinociceptive agents that rely on a motor response of an experimental animal to a noxious stimulus will give false positive results, and may be unethical, if the agent compromises motor function. We report a procedure for measuring potential effects of antinociceptive agents on motor function in the trained rat, using an 80 mm diameter rotarod.</p><p>Rats were selected for ability to exercise on the rotarod and trained to increasing speeds. In test trials, we measured the time that trained rats could stay on the rod, rotating at 25 rpm, with a cut off at 60 min. Morphine administration decreased rotarod performance significantly at doses of 5.0 mg/kg (<em>P</em> < 0.05, <em>n</em> = 10) and 7.5 mg/kg (<em>P</em> < 0.005, <em>n</em> = 10). We also assessed the response to a noxious thermal stimulus by measuring tail flick latency following tail immersion in water at 49°C. A significant dose-dependent increase in tail flick latency was found for dosages of morphine between 2.5 mg/kg and 7.5 mg/kg (<em>P</em> < 0.005, <em>n</em> = 10).</p><p>Our rotarod procedure, which incorporates selection, training, and a 60 min trial, provides a sensitive and consistent means of assessing motor function. Our results, implying that morphine indeed compromises motor function in rats at doses at which it is antinociceptive, confirm the necessity for investigating the motor effects of any putative antinociceptive agent.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pharmacological methods\",\"volume\":\"26 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 149-159\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0160-5402(91)90063-B\",\"citationCount\":\"59\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pharmacological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016054029190063B\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacological methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016054029190063B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 59
摘要
假定的抗伤害性药物的测试依赖于实验动物对有害刺激的运动反应,如果药物损害运动功能,则会产生假阳性结果,并且可能是不道德的。我们报告了一种测量抗感觉药物对训练大鼠运动功能的潜在影响的程序,使用直径80毫米的旋转杆。老鼠是根据在旋转棒上运动的能力来选择的,并训练它们提高速度。在试验中,我们测量了训练大鼠在杆上停留的时间,旋转速度为25rpm,在60分钟时停止。吗啡给药5.0 mg/kg时显著降低了旋转棒的性能(P <0.05, n = 10)和7.5 mg/kg (P <0.005, n = 10)。我们还通过测量尾巴浸泡在49°C的水中后的甩尾潜伏期来评估对有害热刺激的反应。当吗啡剂量在2.5 mg/kg和7.5 mg/kg之间时,甩尾潜伏期明显增加(P <0.005, n = 10)。我们的旋转棒程序,包括选择,训练和60分钟的试验,提供了一个敏感和一致的方法来评估运动功能。我们的研究结果表明,吗啡在抗痛觉性剂量下确实会损害大鼠的运动功能,这证实了研究任何假定的抗痛觉性药物的运动作用的必要性。
A revised rotarod procedure for measuring the effect of antinociceptive drugs on motor function in the rat
Tests of putative antinociceptive agents that rely on a motor response of an experimental animal to a noxious stimulus will give false positive results, and may be unethical, if the agent compromises motor function. We report a procedure for measuring potential effects of antinociceptive agents on motor function in the trained rat, using an 80 mm diameter rotarod.
Rats were selected for ability to exercise on the rotarod and trained to increasing speeds. In test trials, we measured the time that trained rats could stay on the rod, rotating at 25 rpm, with a cut off at 60 min. Morphine administration decreased rotarod performance significantly at doses of 5.0 mg/kg (P < 0.05, n = 10) and 7.5 mg/kg (P < 0.005, n = 10). We also assessed the response to a noxious thermal stimulus by measuring tail flick latency following tail immersion in water at 49°C. A significant dose-dependent increase in tail flick latency was found for dosages of morphine between 2.5 mg/kg and 7.5 mg/kg (P < 0.005, n = 10).
Our rotarod procedure, which incorporates selection, training, and a 60 min trial, provides a sensitive and consistent means of assessing motor function. Our results, implying that morphine indeed compromises motor function in rats at doses at which it is antinociceptive, confirm the necessity for investigating the motor effects of any putative antinociceptive agent.