美德伦理作为一种伦理观点的复兴

Chris O. Abakare
{"title":"美德伦理作为一种伦理观点的复兴","authors":"Chris O. Abakare","doi":"10.25273/SHE.V2I2.9331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aristotle and Plato were the chief architects of virtue ethics, but their own formulation of virtue ethics was mostly subdued with the appearance of consequentialism as well as Kantian deontology. However, modem thinkers have attempted to revive virtue ethics in its new form and in this regard the name which is popularly known is G.E.M. Anscombe. In fact Anscombe clearly indicates in what sense virtue ethics can be revived and what was wrong with the traditional virtue ethics as expounded by Aristotle and Plato. Anscombe points out three important issues for which traditional virtue ethics perhaps lost its glory. First, moral philosophy in general cannot survive without an adequate philosophy of psychology and this thing was absent in the traditional virtue ethics. Secondly, without psychological possibility the concepts of moral obligation and moral duty, the moral sense of ought to be jeopardized. Thirdly and importantly, the differences between the well-known English writers on moral philosophy from Sidgwick to the present day are of little importance. This task of this paper is to review the revival of virtue ethics","PeriodicalId":196405,"journal":{"name":"Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE REVIVAL OF VIRTUE ETHICS AS AN ETHICAL VIEW\",\"authors\":\"Chris O. Abakare\",\"doi\":\"10.25273/SHE.V2I2.9331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aristotle and Plato were the chief architects of virtue ethics, but their own formulation of virtue ethics was mostly subdued with the appearance of consequentialism as well as Kantian deontology. However, modem thinkers have attempted to revive virtue ethics in its new form and in this regard the name which is popularly known is G.E.M. Anscombe. In fact Anscombe clearly indicates in what sense virtue ethics can be revived and what was wrong with the traditional virtue ethics as expounded by Aristotle and Plato. Anscombe points out three important issues for which traditional virtue ethics perhaps lost its glory. First, moral philosophy in general cannot survive without an adequate philosophy of psychology and this thing was absent in the traditional virtue ethics. Secondly, without psychological possibility the concepts of moral obligation and moral duty, the moral sense of ought to be jeopardized. Thirdly and importantly, the differences between the well-known English writers on moral philosophy from Sidgwick to the present day are of little importance. This task of this paper is to review the revival of virtue ethics\",\"PeriodicalId\":196405,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25273/SHE.V2I2.9331\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Sciences, Humanities and Education Journal (SHE Journal)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25273/SHE.V2I2.9331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

亚里士多德和柏拉图是美德伦理学的主要缔造者,但他们自己的美德伦理学的表述大多被结果主义和康德的义务论的出现所压制。然而,现代思想家试图以新的形式复兴美德伦理学,在这方面,人们熟知的名字是G.E.M.安斯科姆。事实上,安斯科姆清楚地指出了美德伦理学在什么意义上可以复兴,以及亚里士多德和柏拉图所阐述的传统美德伦理学的错误之处。安斯科姆指出了传统美德伦理可能因此而失去荣耀的三个重要问题。首先,一般的道德哲学离不开足够的心理哲学,而这在传统的美德伦理学中是缺失的。其次,道德义务和道德责任的概念没有了心理可能性,道德意识就应该受到损害。第三,重要的是,从西季威克到现在,英国著名的道德哲学作家之间的差异并不重要。本文的任务是对美德伦理学的复兴进行回顾
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
THE REVIVAL OF VIRTUE ETHICS AS AN ETHICAL VIEW
Aristotle and Plato were the chief architects of virtue ethics, but their own formulation of virtue ethics was mostly subdued with the appearance of consequentialism as well as Kantian deontology. However, modem thinkers have attempted to revive virtue ethics in its new form and in this regard the name which is popularly known is G.E.M. Anscombe. In fact Anscombe clearly indicates in what sense virtue ethics can be revived and what was wrong with the traditional virtue ethics as expounded by Aristotle and Plato. Anscombe points out three important issues for which traditional virtue ethics perhaps lost its glory. First, moral philosophy in general cannot survive without an adequate philosophy of psychology and this thing was absent in the traditional virtue ethics. Secondly, without psychological possibility the concepts of moral obligation and moral duty, the moral sense of ought to be jeopardized. Thirdly and importantly, the differences between the well-known English writers on moral philosophy from Sidgwick to the present day are of little importance. This task of this paper is to review the revival of virtue ethics
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信