{"title":"不同类型语言BERT模型中语言特征编码的跨语言比较","authors":"Yulia Otmakhova, Karin M. Verspoor, Jey Han Lau","doi":"10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though recently there have been an increased interest in how pre-trained language models encode different linguistic features, there is still a lack of systematic comparison between languages with different morphology and syntax. In this paper, using BERT as an example of a pre-trained model, we compare how three typologically different languages (English, Korean, and Russian) encode morphology and syntax features across different layers. In particular, we contrast languages which differ in a particular aspect, such as flexibility of word order, head directionality, morphological type, presence of grammatical gender, and morphological richness, across four different tasks.","PeriodicalId":255232,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-linguistic Comparison of Linguistic Feature Encoding in BERT Models for Typologically Different Languages\",\"authors\":\"Yulia Otmakhova, Karin M. Verspoor, Jey Han Lau\",\"doi\":\"10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though recently there have been an increased interest in how pre-trained language models encode different linguistic features, there is still a lack of systematic comparison between languages with different morphology and syntax. In this paper, using BERT as an example of a pre-trained model, we compare how three typologically different languages (English, Korean, and Russian) encode morphology and syntax features across different layers. In particular, we contrast languages which differ in a particular aspect, such as flexibility of word order, head directionality, morphological type, presence of grammatical gender, and morphological richness, across four different tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":255232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Research in Computational Linguistic Typology and Multilingual NLP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.sigtyp-1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Cross-linguistic Comparison of Linguistic Feature Encoding in BERT Models for Typologically Different Languages
Though recently there have been an increased interest in how pre-trained language models encode different linguistic features, there is still a lack of systematic comparison between languages with different morphology and syntax. In this paper, using BERT as an example of a pre-trained model, we compare how three typologically different languages (English, Korean, and Russian) encode morphology and syntax features across different layers. In particular, we contrast languages which differ in a particular aspect, such as flexibility of word order, head directionality, morphological type, presence of grammatical gender, and morphological richness, across four different tasks.