公共知识

Marlene H. Dortch
{"title":"公共知识","authors":"Marlene H. Dortch","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1h9dgtj.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Public Knowledge supports and applauds the FCC’s proposed Order establishing rate caps. Although Public Knowledge believes the Commission has the authority to ban commissions, Public Knowledge also agrees that imposing a cap on rates, combined with continued close monitoring and review of the industry, will provide enormous and much needed relief for the families of those incarcerated. However, Public Knowledge expressed concern that providers may attempt to illegally impose unjust and unreasonable fees to circumvent the rate cap – particularly if commissions are still required as a cost of doing business.","PeriodicalId":196956,"journal":{"name":"A City Is Not a Computer","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Knowledge\",\"authors\":\"Marlene H. Dortch\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1h9dgtj.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Public Knowledge supports and applauds the FCC’s proposed Order establishing rate caps. Although Public Knowledge believes the Commission has the authority to ban commissions, Public Knowledge also agrees that imposing a cap on rates, combined with continued close monitoring and review of the industry, will provide enormous and much needed relief for the families of those incarcerated. However, Public Knowledge expressed concern that providers may attempt to illegally impose unjust and unreasonable fees to circumvent the rate cap – particularly if commissions are still required as a cost of doing business.\",\"PeriodicalId\":196956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"A City Is Not a Computer\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"A City Is Not a Computer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1h9dgtj.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"A City Is Not a Computer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1h9dgtj.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公共知识支持并赞扬联邦通信委员会提出的建立费率上限的命令。虽然公共知识认为委员会有权禁止佣金,但公共知识也同意,对费率设定上限,并结合对该行业的持续密切监督和审查,将为被监禁者的家庭提供巨大而急需的救济。然而,“公共知识”表示关切的是,提供商可能试图非法征收不公正和不合理的费用,以规避费率上限,特别是在仍然需要佣金作为经营成本的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Knowledge
Public Knowledge supports and applauds the FCC’s proposed Order establishing rate caps. Although Public Knowledge believes the Commission has the authority to ban commissions, Public Knowledge also agrees that imposing a cap on rates, combined with continued close monitoring and review of the industry, will provide enormous and much needed relief for the families of those incarcerated. However, Public Knowledge expressed concern that providers may attempt to illegally impose unjust and unreasonable fees to circumvent the rate cap – particularly if commissions are still required as a cost of doing business.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信