“人人都知道纠察线意味着什么”:不列颠哥伦比亚省上诉法院前的纠察线

J. Fudge, E. Tucker
{"title":"“人人都知道纠察线意味着什么”:不列颠哥伦比亚省上诉法院前的纠察线","authors":"J. Fudge, E. Tucker","doi":"10.14288/BCS.V0I162.271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The general hostility of courts towards workers’ collective action is well documented, but even against that standard the restrictive approach of the British Columbia Court of Appeal stands out. Although this trend first became apparent in a series of cases before World War II in which the court treated peaceful picketing as unlawful and narrowly interpreted British Columbia’s Trade Union Act (1902), which limited trade unions’ common law liability, this study will focus on the court’s post-War jurisprudence. The legal environment for trade union activity was radically altered during World War II by PC 1003, which provided unions with a procedural mechanism for acquiring collective bargaining rights and imposed a duty on employers to recognize and bargain in good faith with certified unions. At the end of the war, all provinces, including British Columbia, enacted collective bargaining legislation based on this model. The law, however, did not alter the judicially created common law rules governing collective action. As a result, important questions about the interaction between the statutory regime and the common law were unresolved. As trade union membership grew and labour militancy increased, the British Columbia Court of Appeal was soon given the opportunity to address these issues and in a series of decisions handed down through the 1950s and 1960s it narrowly limited the ambit for lawful workers’ collective action. The Social Credit government largely supported the court’s approach but when the first NDP government in British Columbia was elected in 1972 it stripped the court of its power to regulate picketing and transferred it to an administrative board. This chapter will examine the court’s work during this period and investigate the reasons for the court’s approach, taking into account the economic, social and political context of British Columbia as well as considering the backgrounds and attitudes of the members of the court during this period.","PeriodicalId":215343,"journal":{"name":"Labor Law eJournal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"'Everybody Knows What a Picket Line Means': Picketing Before the British Columbia Court of Appeal\",\"authors\":\"J. Fudge, E. Tucker\",\"doi\":\"10.14288/BCS.V0I162.271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The general hostility of courts towards workers’ collective action is well documented, but even against that standard the restrictive approach of the British Columbia Court of Appeal stands out. Although this trend first became apparent in a series of cases before World War II in which the court treated peaceful picketing as unlawful and narrowly interpreted British Columbia’s Trade Union Act (1902), which limited trade unions’ common law liability, this study will focus on the court’s post-War jurisprudence. The legal environment for trade union activity was radically altered during World War II by PC 1003, which provided unions with a procedural mechanism for acquiring collective bargaining rights and imposed a duty on employers to recognize and bargain in good faith with certified unions. At the end of the war, all provinces, including British Columbia, enacted collective bargaining legislation based on this model. The law, however, did not alter the judicially created common law rules governing collective action. As a result, important questions about the interaction between the statutory regime and the common law were unresolved. As trade union membership grew and labour militancy increased, the British Columbia Court of Appeal was soon given the opportunity to address these issues and in a series of decisions handed down through the 1950s and 1960s it narrowly limited the ambit for lawful workers’ collective action. The Social Credit government largely supported the court’s approach but when the first NDP government in British Columbia was elected in 1972 it stripped the court of its power to regulate picketing and transferred it to an administrative board. This chapter will examine the court’s work during this period and investigate the reasons for the court’s approach, taking into account the economic, social and political context of British Columbia as well as considering the backgrounds and attitudes of the members of the court during this period.\",\"PeriodicalId\":215343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14288/BCS.V0I162.271\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14288/BCS.V0I162.271","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

法院对工人集体行动的普遍敌意是有据可查的,但即使在这种标准下,不列颠哥伦比亚省上诉法院的限制性做法也很突出。虽然这一趋势在第二次世界大战之前的一系列案件中首次显现出来,在这些案件中,法院将和平纠察视为非法,并狭隘地解释了不列颠哥伦比亚省的《工会法》(1902年),该法案限制了工会的普通法责任,但本研究将重点放在法院的战后法理上。第二次世界大战期间,pc1003从根本上改变了工会活动的法律环境,它为工会提供了获得集体谈判权的程序机制,并规定雇主有义务承认并真诚地与经认证的工会进行谈判。战争结束时,包括不列颠哥伦比亚省在内的所有省份都以这种模式为基础制定了集体谈判立法。然而,这项法律并没有改变司法上制定的管理集体行动的普通法规则。因此,有关成文法制度与普通法之间相互作用的重要问题没有得到解决。随着工会成员的增加和劳工战斗性的增强,不列颠哥伦比亚省上诉法院很快得到了解决这些问题的机会,在20世纪50年代和60年代发布的一系列决定中,它严格限制了合法工人集体行动的范围。社会信用政府在很大程度上支持法院的做法,但当1972年新民主党在不列颠哥伦比亚省当选第一届政府时,它剥夺了法院监管纠察的权力,并将其移交给一个行政委员会。本章将考察法院在这一时期的工作,并调查法院采取这种做法的原因,同时考虑到不列颠哥伦比亚省的经济、社会和政治背景,以及法院成员在这一时期的背景和态度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
'Everybody Knows What a Picket Line Means': Picketing Before the British Columbia Court of Appeal
The general hostility of courts towards workers’ collective action is well documented, but even against that standard the restrictive approach of the British Columbia Court of Appeal stands out. Although this trend first became apparent in a series of cases before World War II in which the court treated peaceful picketing as unlawful and narrowly interpreted British Columbia’s Trade Union Act (1902), which limited trade unions’ common law liability, this study will focus on the court’s post-War jurisprudence. The legal environment for trade union activity was radically altered during World War II by PC 1003, which provided unions with a procedural mechanism for acquiring collective bargaining rights and imposed a duty on employers to recognize and bargain in good faith with certified unions. At the end of the war, all provinces, including British Columbia, enacted collective bargaining legislation based on this model. The law, however, did not alter the judicially created common law rules governing collective action. As a result, important questions about the interaction between the statutory regime and the common law were unresolved. As trade union membership grew and labour militancy increased, the British Columbia Court of Appeal was soon given the opportunity to address these issues and in a series of decisions handed down through the 1950s and 1960s it narrowly limited the ambit for lawful workers’ collective action. The Social Credit government largely supported the court’s approach but when the first NDP government in British Columbia was elected in 1972 it stripped the court of its power to regulate picketing and transferred it to an administrative board. This chapter will examine the court’s work during this period and investigate the reasons for the court’s approach, taking into account the economic, social and political context of British Columbia as well as considering the backgrounds and attitudes of the members of the court during this period.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信