信任习惯:在动荡时期的一种应对方式

B. Misztal
{"title":"信任习惯:在动荡时期的一种应对方式","authors":"B. Misztal","doi":"10.1163/9789004390430_005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the re-conceptualization of modernity in terms of high levels of risk, complexity and uncertainty, trust has come to be seen as the essential asset in the unsettled times without which we can make no decisions and take no initiatives. More generally, trust is a fundamental resource, as with trust societies flourish and ‘when trust is destroyed, societies falter and collapse’ (Bok 1979: 26), thus it is the important condition of societal well-being. Presently, the growing demand for trust is accompanied by the growing deficit of trust. The current breakdown of trust is evident all over the world; it is observable in many Western political systems (Hosking 2014), it is noticeable among many industrialized nations (Sasaki 2016), there is empirical evidence of the erosion of trust in professions on the global scale (Drezner 2017) and the growing distrust of facts is reported around the world (Greenfield 2017). As the erosion of trust has reached a new global level, the loss of trust in established institutions is particularly evident; for example, in the United States, where people’s trust in Congress fell from 42 percent in 1973 to 7 percent in 2014. Americans have also lost confidence in unions, public schools, organized religion, business, healthcare, police and media; in 2016, a Gallup poll found that only three in ten Americans trusted mass media to accurately report the news (Drezner 2017: 23–5). The noticeable decline of the trust levels in the contemporary world, together with the continuous demand for it, calls for searching for new ways of regaining the feelings of continuity, security and strength to face change. In other words, as ‘we are doomed more and more to trust under complex conditions’ (Sloterdijk 2016: 161), we need to debate how to manage the discontinuity, risk and change without having ‘to combine trust with alarm systems’ (Sloterdijk 2016: 162). This paper asserts that one of the ways to address the issue of trust deficit should start with the appreciation of the habit’s capacity to reinforce trust. While realizing that habit is still often seen as a very old-fashioned notion connected with such ideas as tradition, irrationality, reproduction and passivity, it focuses on trust’s links with habit and the habit’s plasticity (Bernacer, Lombo","PeriodicalId":140910,"journal":{"name":"Trust in Contemporary Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trust in Habit: A Way of Coping in Unsettled Times\",\"authors\":\"B. Misztal\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004390430_005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the re-conceptualization of modernity in terms of high levels of risk, complexity and uncertainty, trust has come to be seen as the essential asset in the unsettled times without which we can make no decisions and take no initiatives. More generally, trust is a fundamental resource, as with trust societies flourish and ‘when trust is destroyed, societies falter and collapse’ (Bok 1979: 26), thus it is the important condition of societal well-being. Presently, the growing demand for trust is accompanied by the growing deficit of trust. The current breakdown of trust is evident all over the world; it is observable in many Western political systems (Hosking 2014), it is noticeable among many industrialized nations (Sasaki 2016), there is empirical evidence of the erosion of trust in professions on the global scale (Drezner 2017) and the growing distrust of facts is reported around the world (Greenfield 2017). As the erosion of trust has reached a new global level, the loss of trust in established institutions is particularly evident; for example, in the United States, where people’s trust in Congress fell from 42 percent in 1973 to 7 percent in 2014. Americans have also lost confidence in unions, public schools, organized religion, business, healthcare, police and media; in 2016, a Gallup poll found that only three in ten Americans trusted mass media to accurately report the news (Drezner 2017: 23–5). The noticeable decline of the trust levels in the contemporary world, together with the continuous demand for it, calls for searching for new ways of regaining the feelings of continuity, security and strength to face change. In other words, as ‘we are doomed more and more to trust under complex conditions’ (Sloterdijk 2016: 161), we need to debate how to manage the discontinuity, risk and change without having ‘to combine trust with alarm systems’ (Sloterdijk 2016: 162). This paper asserts that one of the ways to address the issue of trust deficit should start with the appreciation of the habit’s capacity to reinforce trust. While realizing that habit is still often seen as a very old-fashioned notion connected with such ideas as tradition, irrationality, reproduction and passivity, it focuses on trust’s links with habit and the habit’s plasticity (Bernacer, Lombo\",\"PeriodicalId\":140910,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trust in Contemporary Society\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trust in Contemporary Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390430_005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trust in Contemporary Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004390430_005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

随着现代性在高风险、复杂性和不确定性方面的重新概念化,信任已被视为动荡时期的重要资产,没有信任,我们就无法做出决定,也无法采取主动。更普遍地说,信任是一种基本资源,因为有了信任,社会就会繁荣,“当信任被破坏时,社会就会动摇和崩溃”(Bok 1979: 26),因此它是社会福祉的重要条件。当前,在信任需求不断增长的同时,信任赤字也在不断扩大。目前信任的崩溃在全世界都很明显;这在许多西方政治制度中都是可以观察到的(Hosking 2014),在许多工业化国家中也是显而易见的(Sasaki 2016),有经验证据表明,在全球范围内,人们对职业的信任正在受到侵蚀(Drezner 2017),世界各地都报道了对事实的日益不信任(Greenfield 2017)。由于信任的侵蚀已达到新的全球水平,对既定机构的信任丧失尤为明显;例如,在美国,人们对国会的信任度从1973年的42%下降到2014年的7%。美国人对工会、公立学校、有组织的宗教、商业、医疗、警察和媒体也失去了信心;2016年,盖洛普民意调查发现,只有十分之三的美国人相信大众媒体准确报道新闻(Drezner 2017: 23-5)。当今世界的信任水平明显下降,加上对信任的持续需求,要求我们寻找新的方法,重新获得面对变化的连续性、安全感和力量。换句话说,“在复杂的条件下,我们注定要越来越信任”(Sloterdijk 2016: 161),我们需要讨论如何管理不连续性、风险和变化,而不必“将信任与警报系统结合起来”(Sloterdijk 2016: 162)。本文认为,解决信任赤字问题的途径之一应该从认识到习惯增强信任的能力开始。虽然意识到习惯仍然经常被视为一个非常过时的概念,与传统、非理性、再生产和被动等观念联系在一起,但它关注的是信任与习惯的联系以及习惯的可塑性(Bernacer, Lombo)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trust in Habit: A Way of Coping in Unsettled Times
With the re-conceptualization of modernity in terms of high levels of risk, complexity and uncertainty, trust has come to be seen as the essential asset in the unsettled times without which we can make no decisions and take no initiatives. More generally, trust is a fundamental resource, as with trust societies flourish and ‘when trust is destroyed, societies falter and collapse’ (Bok 1979: 26), thus it is the important condition of societal well-being. Presently, the growing demand for trust is accompanied by the growing deficit of trust. The current breakdown of trust is evident all over the world; it is observable in many Western political systems (Hosking 2014), it is noticeable among many industrialized nations (Sasaki 2016), there is empirical evidence of the erosion of trust in professions on the global scale (Drezner 2017) and the growing distrust of facts is reported around the world (Greenfield 2017). As the erosion of trust has reached a new global level, the loss of trust in established institutions is particularly evident; for example, in the United States, where people’s trust in Congress fell from 42 percent in 1973 to 7 percent in 2014. Americans have also lost confidence in unions, public schools, organized religion, business, healthcare, police and media; in 2016, a Gallup poll found that only three in ten Americans trusted mass media to accurately report the news (Drezner 2017: 23–5). The noticeable decline of the trust levels in the contemporary world, together with the continuous demand for it, calls for searching for new ways of regaining the feelings of continuity, security and strength to face change. In other words, as ‘we are doomed more and more to trust under complex conditions’ (Sloterdijk 2016: 161), we need to debate how to manage the discontinuity, risk and change without having ‘to combine trust with alarm systems’ (Sloterdijk 2016: 162). This paper asserts that one of the ways to address the issue of trust deficit should start with the appreciation of the habit’s capacity to reinforce trust. While realizing that habit is still often seen as a very old-fashioned notion connected with such ideas as tradition, irrationality, reproduction and passivity, it focuses on trust’s links with habit and the habit’s plasticity (Bernacer, Lombo
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信