静态场景下多路径与单路径路由性能比较

Zheng Wan
{"title":"静态场景下多路径与单路径路由性能比较","authors":"Zheng Wan","doi":"10.1109/ICNDC.2012.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past decade, multipath routing has been proposed to provide reliability for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). As wireless mesh networks become more and more popular, performance evaluation of different routing algorithms is required in static scenarios. Performance comparison between unipath routing and multipath routing is conducted in this paper. From the simulation results we find that multiple paths should not be employed simultaneously to avoid interference among paths. Researchers should focus on how to find the path with the best quality.","PeriodicalId":151593,"journal":{"name":"2012 Third International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of Multipath and Unipath Routing in Static Scenarios\",\"authors\":\"Zheng Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICNDC.2012.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past decade, multipath routing has been proposed to provide reliability for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). As wireless mesh networks become more and more popular, performance evaluation of different routing algorithms is required in static scenarios. Performance comparison between unipath routing and multipath routing is conducted in this paper. From the simulation results we find that multiple paths should not be employed simultaneously to avoid interference among paths. Researchers should focus on how to find the path with the best quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":151593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 Third International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 Third International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNDC.2012.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 Third International Conference on Networking and Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNDC.2012.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的十年中,多路径路由被提出为移动自组织网络(manet)提供可靠性。随着无线网状网络的日益普及,在静态场景下需要对不同的路由算法进行性能评估。本文对单路径路由和多路径路由的性能进行了比较。仿真结果表明,为了避免路径间的干扰,不应同时使用多条路径。研究人员应该关注如何找到质量最好的路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Comparison of Multipath and Unipath Routing in Static Scenarios
In the past decade, multipath routing has been proposed to provide reliability for mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). As wireless mesh networks become more and more popular, performance evaluation of different routing algorithms is required in static scenarios. Performance comparison between unipath routing and multipath routing is conducted in this paper. From the simulation results we find that multiple paths should not be employed simultaneously to avoid interference among paths. Researchers should focus on how to find the path with the best quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信