接种或不接种:公共卫生行动对疫苗犹豫的影响

Y. Dhif, P. Bonnabry, A. Diana
{"title":"接种或不接种:公共卫生行动对疫苗犹豫的影响","authors":"Y. Dhif, P. Bonnabry, A. Diana","doi":"10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and importanceVaccine hesitancy is one of the top 10 threats to global health according to the World Health Organization.1 A part of the Swiss population is hesitant to vaccinate against COVID-19.2Aim and objectivesThe aim of this study was to conduct a public health action with hesitant to vaccination and measure its impact on vaccine hesitancy and on vaccination rate.Material and methodsVaccine hesitancy and barriers to vaccination were measured and identified using a pre-test questionnaire. Only non-vaccinated volunteer participants were included, and they were invited to a 1-hour online session using motivational interviewing techniques, animated by a physician and a pharmacist. Two weeks after the session, they were asked to fill a post-test and 2 months later, their vaccine status was requested. Data collection was conducted from April to August 2021.Results31 adults participated for a total of 11 online sessions (2.8 participants/session). Majority were women (68%, n=21) and aged between 35 and 60 years (71%). 10 (32.3%) were public health professionals and 21 (67.7%) were not. Prior to the study, 54.9% did not consider vaccines safe (19.4% post-study), 87.1% were concerned about vaccine side effects (64.5% post-study) and 51.6% considered vaccines to be effective (83.9% post-study). Before the study, participants were classified as certainly willing to vaccinate (3.2%), probably (9.7%), probably not (35.5%), certainly not (12.9%), do not know/other (38.8%) and the degree of confidence in vaccination was 4.5 ± 2.2 (scale 1–10). After the study, the confidence increased to 6.3 ± 2.4 (+29%). Following the study, 52% (n=14) were effectively vaccinated. Among reasons that motivated to vaccinate: vaccination will help with containing the pandemic (5/14) and benefit-risk ratio is positive for the vaccine (5/14). 48% (n=13) were not vaccinated mainly for the following reasons: doubt about the effectiveness (2/13) and fear of side effects (2/13). Opinion on vaccines was moved mainly by having personal questions answered and feeling not judged for having a different opinion on vaccination.Conclusion and relevanceIn this study we could reduce vaccine hesitancy by increasing the degree of confidence in the vaccine and our action effectively convinced half the participants to get vaccinated.References and/or acknowledgements1. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-20192. https://sotomo.ch/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/6.-SRG-Corona-Monitor.pdfConflict of interestNo conflict of interest","PeriodicalId":393937,"journal":{"name":"Section 7: Post Congress additions","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4CPS-022 To vaccinate or not to vaccinate: impact of a public health action on vaccine hesitancy\",\"authors\":\"Y. Dhif, P. Bonnabry, A. Diana\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and importanceVaccine hesitancy is one of the top 10 threats to global health according to the World Health Organization.1 A part of the Swiss population is hesitant to vaccinate against COVID-19.2Aim and objectivesThe aim of this study was to conduct a public health action with hesitant to vaccination and measure its impact on vaccine hesitancy and on vaccination rate.Material and methodsVaccine hesitancy and barriers to vaccination were measured and identified using a pre-test questionnaire. Only non-vaccinated volunteer participants were included, and they were invited to a 1-hour online session using motivational interviewing techniques, animated by a physician and a pharmacist. Two weeks after the session, they were asked to fill a post-test and 2 months later, their vaccine status was requested. Data collection was conducted from April to August 2021.Results31 adults participated for a total of 11 online sessions (2.8 participants/session). Majority were women (68%, n=21) and aged between 35 and 60 years (71%). 10 (32.3%) were public health professionals and 21 (67.7%) were not. Prior to the study, 54.9% did not consider vaccines safe (19.4% post-study), 87.1% were concerned about vaccine side effects (64.5% post-study) and 51.6% considered vaccines to be effective (83.9% post-study). Before the study, participants were classified as certainly willing to vaccinate (3.2%), probably (9.7%), probably not (35.5%), certainly not (12.9%), do not know/other (38.8%) and the degree of confidence in vaccination was 4.5 ± 2.2 (scale 1–10). After the study, the confidence increased to 6.3 ± 2.4 (+29%). Following the study, 52% (n=14) were effectively vaccinated. Among reasons that motivated to vaccinate: vaccination will help with containing the pandemic (5/14) and benefit-risk ratio is positive for the vaccine (5/14). 48% (n=13) were not vaccinated mainly for the following reasons: doubt about the effectiveness (2/13) and fear of side effects (2/13). Opinion on vaccines was moved mainly by having personal questions answered and feeling not judged for having a different opinion on vaccination.Conclusion and relevanceIn this study we could reduce vaccine hesitancy by increasing the degree of confidence in the vaccine and our action effectively convinced half the participants to get vaccinated.References and/or acknowledgements1. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-20192. https://sotomo.ch/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/6.-SRG-Corona-Monitor.pdfConflict of interestNo conflict of interest\",\"PeriodicalId\":393937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Section 7: Post Congress additions\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Section 7: Post Congress additions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.380\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Section 7: Post Congress additions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-eahp.380","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和重要性根据世界卫生组织,疫苗犹豫是全球健康的十大威胁之一。1部分瑞士人口对接种covid -19疫苗犹豫不决。2目的和目的本研究的目的是开展一项对疫苗接种犹豫不决的公共卫生行动,并衡量其对疫苗犹豫和疫苗接种率的影响。材料和方法使用测试前问卷对疫苗犹豫和疫苗接种障碍进行测量和确定。只有未接种疫苗的志愿者被包括在内,他们被邀请参加一个1小时的在线会议,使用动机性访谈技术,由医生和药剂师指导。两周后,他们被要求填写后测试,两个月后,他们的疫苗状态被要求。数据收集于2021年4月至8月进行。结果31名成年人参加了11个在线会话(2.8人/会话)。大多数是女性(68%,n=21),年龄在35至60岁之间(71%)。公共卫生专业人员10人(32.3%),非公共卫生专业人员21人(67.7%)。在研究前,54.9%的人认为疫苗不安全(研究后为19.4%),87.1%的人担心疫苗副作用(研究后为64.5%),51.6%的人认为疫苗有效(研究后为83.9%)。在研究开始前,参与者被分类为肯定愿意接种疫苗(3.2%),可能(9.7%),可能不(35.5%),肯定不(12.9%),不知道/其他(38.8%),对接种疫苗的置信度为4.5±2.2(量表1-10)。研究结束后,置信度提高到6.3±2.4(+29%)。研究结束后,52% (n=14)的人有效接种了疫苗。促使人们接种疫苗的原因包括:接种疫苗将有助于遏制大流行(5/14),疫苗的利益风险比为正(5/14)。48% (n=13)未接种疫苗的主要原因是:怀疑有效性(2/13)和担心副作用(2/13)。人们对疫苗的看法主要是通过回答个人问题,而不是因为对疫苗接种有不同的看法而受到评判。结论和相关性在这项研究中,我们可以通过增加对疫苗的信心程度来减少疫苗犹豫,我们的行动有效地说服了一半的参与者接种疫苗。参考文献和/或致谢https://www.who.int/news room/spotlight/ten - - -全球卫生威胁- 20192。没有利益冲突
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
4CPS-022 To vaccinate or not to vaccinate: impact of a public health action on vaccine hesitancy
Background and importanceVaccine hesitancy is one of the top 10 threats to global health according to the World Health Organization.1 A part of the Swiss population is hesitant to vaccinate against COVID-19.2Aim and objectivesThe aim of this study was to conduct a public health action with hesitant to vaccination and measure its impact on vaccine hesitancy and on vaccination rate.Material and methodsVaccine hesitancy and barriers to vaccination were measured and identified using a pre-test questionnaire. Only non-vaccinated volunteer participants were included, and they were invited to a 1-hour online session using motivational interviewing techniques, animated by a physician and a pharmacist. Two weeks after the session, they were asked to fill a post-test and 2 months later, their vaccine status was requested. Data collection was conducted from April to August 2021.Results31 adults participated for a total of 11 online sessions (2.8 participants/session). Majority were women (68%, n=21) and aged between 35 and 60 years (71%). 10 (32.3%) were public health professionals and 21 (67.7%) were not. Prior to the study, 54.9% did not consider vaccines safe (19.4% post-study), 87.1% were concerned about vaccine side effects (64.5% post-study) and 51.6% considered vaccines to be effective (83.9% post-study). Before the study, participants were classified as certainly willing to vaccinate (3.2%), probably (9.7%), probably not (35.5%), certainly not (12.9%), do not know/other (38.8%) and the degree of confidence in vaccination was 4.5 ± 2.2 (scale 1–10). After the study, the confidence increased to 6.3 ± 2.4 (+29%). Following the study, 52% (n=14) were effectively vaccinated. Among reasons that motivated to vaccinate: vaccination will help with containing the pandemic (5/14) and benefit-risk ratio is positive for the vaccine (5/14). 48% (n=13) were not vaccinated mainly for the following reasons: doubt about the effectiveness (2/13) and fear of side effects (2/13). Opinion on vaccines was moved mainly by having personal questions answered and feeling not judged for having a different opinion on vaccination.Conclusion and relevanceIn this study we could reduce vaccine hesitancy by increasing the degree of confidence in the vaccine and our action effectively convinced half the participants to get vaccinated.References and/or acknowledgements1. https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-20192. https://sotomo.ch/site/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/6.-SRG-Corona-Monitor.pdfConflict of interestNo conflict of interest
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信