可用性语言有什么可确定的?

P. Abdulla, M. Atig, R. Meyer, M. Salehi
{"title":"可用性语言有什么可确定的?","authors":"P. Abdulla, M. Atig, R. Meyer, M. Salehi","doi":"10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2015.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study here the algorithmic analysis of systems modeled in terms of availability languages. Our first main result is a positive answer to the emptiness problem: it is decidable whether a given availability language contains a word. The key idea is an inductive construction that replaces availability languages with Parikh-equivalent regular languages. As a second contribution, we solve the intersection problem modulo bounded languages: given availability languages and a bounded language, it is decidable whether the intersection of the former contains a word from the bounded language. We show that the problem is NP-complete. The idea is to reduce to satisfiability of existential Presburger arithmetic. Since the (general) intersection problem for availability languages is known to be undecidable, our results characterize the decidability border for this model. Our last contribution is a study of the containment problem between regular and availability languages. We show that safety verification, i.e., checking containment of an availability language in a regular language, is decidable. The containment problem of regular languages in availability languages is proven undecidable.","PeriodicalId":175000,"journal":{"name":"Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What's Decidable about Availability Languages?\",\"authors\":\"P. Abdulla, M. Atig, R. Meyer, M. Salehi\",\"doi\":\"10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2015.192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study here the algorithmic analysis of systems modeled in terms of availability languages. Our first main result is a positive answer to the emptiness problem: it is decidable whether a given availability language contains a word. The key idea is an inductive construction that replaces availability languages with Parikh-equivalent regular languages. As a second contribution, we solve the intersection problem modulo bounded languages: given availability languages and a bounded language, it is decidable whether the intersection of the former contains a word from the bounded language. We show that the problem is NP-complete. The idea is to reduce to satisfiability of existential Presburger arithmetic. Since the (general) intersection problem for availability languages is known to be undecidable, our results characterize the decidability border for this model. Our last contribution is a study of the containment problem between regular and availability languages. We show that safety verification, i.e., checking containment of an availability language in a regular language, is decidable. The containment problem of regular languages in availability languages is proven undecidable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2015.192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.FSTTCS.2015.192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

我们在这里研究了基于可用性语言建模的系统的算法分析。我们的第一个主要结果是对空性问题的肯定回答:给定的可用性语言是否包含单词是可确定的。关键思想是用parikh等效的正则语言替换可用性语言的归纳构造。作为第二个贡献,我们解决了模有界语言的交集问题:给定可用性语言和有界语言,前者的交集是否包含有界语言的单词是可确定的。我们证明了这个问题是np完全的。其思想是将存在普雷斯伯格算法约简为可满足性。由于已知可用性语言的(一般)交集问题是不可判定的,因此我们的结果表征了该模型的可判定边界。我们的最后一个贡献是对常规语言和可用性语言之间的包容问题的研究。我们证明了安全验证,即在常规语言中检查可用性语言的包含,是可确定的。证明了可用性语言中正则语言的包含问题是不可确定的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What's Decidable about Availability Languages?
We study here the algorithmic analysis of systems modeled in terms of availability languages. Our first main result is a positive answer to the emptiness problem: it is decidable whether a given availability language contains a word. The key idea is an inductive construction that replaces availability languages with Parikh-equivalent regular languages. As a second contribution, we solve the intersection problem modulo bounded languages: given availability languages and a bounded language, it is decidable whether the intersection of the former contains a word from the bounded language. We show that the problem is NP-complete. The idea is to reduce to satisfiability of existential Presburger arithmetic. Since the (general) intersection problem for availability languages is known to be undecidable, our results characterize the decidability border for this model. Our last contribution is a study of the containment problem between regular and availability languages. We show that safety verification, i.e., checking containment of an availability language in a regular language, is decidable. The containment problem of regular languages in availability languages is proven undecidable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信