{"title":"风能应用中威布尔参数估计的七种数值方法的比较","authors":"A. Teyabeen, F. Akkari, A. Jwaid","doi":"10.1109/UKSim.2017.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Weibull distribution is widely used for the purpose of wind energy estimation. Their parameters should be precisely estimated since the wind energy is affected by it. The aim of this paper is to compare seven numerical methods to find out which is the most efficient for determining the parameters of Weibull distribution based on wind speed data, collected in Zuwara, Libya during 2007 at three hub heights of 10 m, 30 m, and 50 m above ground, by recording the wind speed every 10 minutes. The selected methods used in this study included graphical method, standard deviation method, empirical method of Justus, empirical method of Lysen, energy pattern factor method, maximum likelihood method, and modified maximum likelihood method. The performance of the seven numerical methods is evaluated by using different statistical criteria including mean absolute percentage error, mean absolute bias error, root mean square error, and correlation coefficient. The presented results indicated if Weibull distribution matches well with observed wind speed data, the empirical methods of Justus and Lysen present favorable efficiency; but if not, maximum likelihood gives the best performance followed by empirical methods of Justus and Lysen. The graphical method shows weak performance.","PeriodicalId":309250,"journal":{"name":"2017 UKSim-AMSS 19th International Conference on Computer Modelling & Simulation (UKSim)","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Seven Numerical Methods for Estimating Weibull Parameters for Wind Energy Applications\",\"authors\":\"A. Teyabeen, F. Akkari, A. Jwaid\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/UKSim.2017.31\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Weibull distribution is widely used for the purpose of wind energy estimation. Their parameters should be precisely estimated since the wind energy is affected by it. The aim of this paper is to compare seven numerical methods to find out which is the most efficient for determining the parameters of Weibull distribution based on wind speed data, collected in Zuwara, Libya during 2007 at three hub heights of 10 m, 30 m, and 50 m above ground, by recording the wind speed every 10 minutes. The selected methods used in this study included graphical method, standard deviation method, empirical method of Justus, empirical method of Lysen, energy pattern factor method, maximum likelihood method, and modified maximum likelihood method. The performance of the seven numerical methods is evaluated by using different statistical criteria including mean absolute percentage error, mean absolute bias error, root mean square error, and correlation coefficient. The presented results indicated if Weibull distribution matches well with observed wind speed data, the empirical methods of Justus and Lysen present favorable efficiency; but if not, maximum likelihood gives the best performance followed by empirical methods of Justus and Lysen. The graphical method shows weak performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 UKSim-AMSS 19th International Conference on Computer Modelling & Simulation (UKSim)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 UKSim-AMSS 19th International Conference on Computer Modelling & Simulation (UKSim)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/UKSim.2017.31\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 UKSim-AMSS 19th International Conference on Computer Modelling & Simulation (UKSim)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/UKSim.2017.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
威布尔分布被广泛用于风能估计。由于风能受其影响,应精确估计其参数。本文的目的是比较7种数值方法,以2007年在利比亚Zuwara收集的风速数据为基础,通过记录每10分钟的风速,找出确定威布尔分布参数的最有效方法。该数据采集于距地面10 m, 30 m和50 m的三个枢纽高度。本研究选择的方法包括图解法、标准差法、Justus经验法、Lysen经验法、能量模式因子法、最大似然法和修正最大似然法。采用不同的统计标准,包括平均绝对百分比误差、平均绝对偏差误差、均方根误差和相关系数,对七种数值方法的性能进行了评价。结果表明,在Weibull分布与实测风速吻合较好的情况下,Justus和Lysen的经验方法具有较好的效率;如果没有,则最大似然法的结果最好,其次是Justus和Lysen的经验方法。图形化方法表现出较弱的性能。
Comparison of Seven Numerical Methods for Estimating Weibull Parameters for Wind Energy Applications
Weibull distribution is widely used for the purpose of wind energy estimation. Their parameters should be precisely estimated since the wind energy is affected by it. The aim of this paper is to compare seven numerical methods to find out which is the most efficient for determining the parameters of Weibull distribution based on wind speed data, collected in Zuwara, Libya during 2007 at three hub heights of 10 m, 30 m, and 50 m above ground, by recording the wind speed every 10 minutes. The selected methods used in this study included graphical method, standard deviation method, empirical method of Justus, empirical method of Lysen, energy pattern factor method, maximum likelihood method, and modified maximum likelihood method. The performance of the seven numerical methods is evaluated by using different statistical criteria including mean absolute percentage error, mean absolute bias error, root mean square error, and correlation coefficient. The presented results indicated if Weibull distribution matches well with observed wind speed data, the empirical methods of Justus and Lysen present favorable efficiency; but if not, maximum likelihood gives the best performance followed by empirical methods of Justus and Lysen. The graphical method shows weak performance.