实施博洛尼亚进程:考虑学生的想法,提高教授的课堂表现

F. Díez
{"title":"实施博洛尼亚进程:考虑学生的想法,提高教授的课堂表现","authors":"F. Díez","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1831119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All the so-called “Bologna-process” is paying close attention to many important things regarding High School / University education, such as skills, competences, new research trends, TICs, accreditation and quality assurance, etc. However - to our understanding- is overlooking at least two crucial issues: what students think about University, and how professors achieve excellence in their classes. As to the first topic, although the students are to play a key role in the new European Higher Education Area, and are supposed to be placed at the very centre of the teaching-learning process, however, no schemes are developed yet to hear them, and - whenever necessary or convenient - take their opinions into account. The starting point is asking what makes college an academically and personally successful time for some students but not others. The methodology is conducting interviews and visiting various campuses. The results are, to say the least, pretty counter-intuitive, and to some point somehow astonishing. For example, we learn that students are more enthusiastic about learning in courses that have some relevance to their personal lives or interests outside the classroom, instead of just fulfilling a graduation requirement. Or that students learn more when they collaborate on challenging homework rather than performing their assigned tasks individually. As to the second topic, closely linked to the previous one, much has been said about quality in research, few - in anything - has been written about what makes a class, a team-work, a group discussion or a lecture given by a professor a unique experience. Basically, the point here is, simply, what makes a great teacher great? Who are the professors students remember long after graduation? Drawing on the experiences and techniques of a number of college and university professors who are commonly known as “good professors”, the short answer it’s not what teachers do, it’s what they understand. Lesson plans and lecture notes matter less than the special way teachers comprehend the subject and value human learning. It doesn’t matter whether they’re historians or physicists, or whether they teach in Harvard or somewhere else, the best teachers know their subjects inside and out. But they also know how to engage and challenge students and to provoke impassioned responses. Most of all, they believe two things fervently: that teaching matters and that students can learn. Finally, we offer some practical recommendations on the issues discussed above, departing from the typical “college guides” full of seemingly good advice that is too vague to implement.","PeriodicalId":330356,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementing Bologna Process: Taking into Account What Students Think and Improving Professor’s Performance in Class\",\"authors\":\"F. Díez\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.1831119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"All the so-called “Bologna-process” is paying close attention to many important things regarding High School / University education, such as skills, competences, new research trends, TICs, accreditation and quality assurance, etc. However - to our understanding- is overlooking at least two crucial issues: what students think about University, and how professors achieve excellence in their classes. As to the first topic, although the students are to play a key role in the new European Higher Education Area, and are supposed to be placed at the very centre of the teaching-learning process, however, no schemes are developed yet to hear them, and - whenever necessary or convenient - take their opinions into account. The starting point is asking what makes college an academically and personally successful time for some students but not others. The methodology is conducting interviews and visiting various campuses. The results are, to say the least, pretty counter-intuitive, and to some point somehow astonishing. For example, we learn that students are more enthusiastic about learning in courses that have some relevance to their personal lives or interests outside the classroom, instead of just fulfilling a graduation requirement. Or that students learn more when they collaborate on challenging homework rather than performing their assigned tasks individually. As to the second topic, closely linked to the previous one, much has been said about quality in research, few - in anything - has been written about what makes a class, a team-work, a group discussion or a lecture given by a professor a unique experience. Basically, the point here is, simply, what makes a great teacher great? Who are the professors students remember long after graduation? Drawing on the experiences and techniques of a number of college and university professors who are commonly known as “good professors”, the short answer it’s not what teachers do, it’s what they understand. Lesson plans and lecture notes matter less than the special way teachers comprehend the subject and value human learning. It doesn’t matter whether they’re historians or physicists, or whether they teach in Harvard or somewhere else, the best teachers know their subjects inside and out. But they also know how to engage and challenge students and to provoke impassioned responses. Most of all, they believe two things fervently: that teaching matters and that students can learn. Finally, we offer some practical recommendations on the issues discussed above, departing from the typical “college guides” full of seemingly good advice that is too vague to implement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":330356,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1831119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1831119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

所有所谓的“博洛尼亚进程”都密切关注高中/大学教育的许多重要事项,例如技能,能力,新研究趋势,tic,认证和质量保证等。然而,在我们看来,它至少忽略了两个关键问题:学生对大学的看法,以及教授如何在课堂上取得卓越成就。关于第一个主题,尽管学生将在新的欧洲高等教育区发挥关键作用,并且应该被置于教学过程的中心,然而,还没有制定方案来听取他们的意见,并且-无论何时必要或方便-考虑他们的意见。首先要问的是,是什么让大学对一些学生来说是学业和个人成功的时期,而对另一些学生来说却不是。方法是进行采访和访问各个校园。结果,至少可以说,是非常违反直觉的,在某种程度上是令人惊讶的。例如,我们了解到,学生更热衷于学习与他们的个人生活或兴趣相关的课程,而不仅仅是为了满足毕业要求。或者,当学生们合作完成具有挑战性的作业,而不是单独完成分配给他们的任务时,他们会学到更多。至于第二个主题,与前一个密切相关,关于研究质量的讨论很多,很少有关于如何使课堂、团队合作、小组讨论或教授的讲座成为独特经历的文章。基本上,这里的重点很简单,是什么造就了一个伟大的老师?哪些教授是学生毕业后一直记得的?根据一些被称为“好教授”的大学教授的经验和技巧,简单地说,重要的不是老师做了什么,而是他们理解了什么。比起教案和课堂讲稿,教师理解学科和重视人类学习的特殊方式更为重要。不管他们是历史学家还是物理学家,也不管他们是在哈佛还是其他地方教书,最好的老师对他们的学科了如指掌。但他们也知道如何吸引和挑战学生,并激起慷慨激昂的回应。最重要的是,他们坚信两件事:教学很重要,学生可以学习。最后,我们就上面讨论的问题提供了一些实用的建议,而不是典型的“大学指南”,里面充满了看似好的建议,但却太模糊而无法实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementing Bologna Process: Taking into Account What Students Think and Improving Professor’s Performance in Class
All the so-called “Bologna-process” is paying close attention to many important things regarding High School / University education, such as skills, competences, new research trends, TICs, accreditation and quality assurance, etc. However - to our understanding- is overlooking at least two crucial issues: what students think about University, and how professors achieve excellence in their classes. As to the first topic, although the students are to play a key role in the new European Higher Education Area, and are supposed to be placed at the very centre of the teaching-learning process, however, no schemes are developed yet to hear them, and - whenever necessary or convenient - take their opinions into account. The starting point is asking what makes college an academically and personally successful time for some students but not others. The methodology is conducting interviews and visiting various campuses. The results are, to say the least, pretty counter-intuitive, and to some point somehow astonishing. For example, we learn that students are more enthusiastic about learning in courses that have some relevance to their personal lives or interests outside the classroom, instead of just fulfilling a graduation requirement. Or that students learn more when they collaborate on challenging homework rather than performing their assigned tasks individually. As to the second topic, closely linked to the previous one, much has been said about quality in research, few - in anything - has been written about what makes a class, a team-work, a group discussion or a lecture given by a professor a unique experience. Basically, the point here is, simply, what makes a great teacher great? Who are the professors students remember long after graduation? Drawing on the experiences and techniques of a number of college and university professors who are commonly known as “good professors”, the short answer it’s not what teachers do, it’s what they understand. Lesson plans and lecture notes matter less than the special way teachers comprehend the subject and value human learning. It doesn’t matter whether they’re historians or physicists, or whether they teach in Harvard or somewhere else, the best teachers know their subjects inside and out. But they also know how to engage and challenge students and to provoke impassioned responses. Most of all, they believe two things fervently: that teaching matters and that students can learn. Finally, we offer some practical recommendations on the issues discussed above, departing from the typical “college guides” full of seemingly good advice that is too vague to implement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信