法律解释对业务流程遵从性的影响

S. Ghanavati, J. Hulstijn
{"title":"法律解释对业务流程遵从性的影响","authors":"S. Ghanavati, J. Hulstijn","doi":"10.1109/TELERISE.2015.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regulations are often written as open norms. Thus, the development of systems that support compliance involves interpretation. Often, compliance officers consider several alternative solutions. Comparing the feasibility and deciding which alternative to select are important tasks. In this paper, we aim to show how analyzing the impact of several interpretation can be supported by requirements engineering tools, in particular, by Legal-URN. Two cases are used to illustrate the importance of interpretation and how Legal-URN facilitates it.","PeriodicalId":159844,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on TEchnical and LEgal aspects of data pRivacy and SEcurity","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Legal Interpretation in Business Process Compliance\",\"authors\":\"S. Ghanavati, J. Hulstijn\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TELERISE.2015.13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regulations are often written as open norms. Thus, the development of systems that support compliance involves interpretation. Often, compliance officers consider several alternative solutions. Comparing the feasibility and deciding which alternative to select are important tasks. In this paper, we aim to show how analyzing the impact of several interpretation can be supported by requirements engineering tools, in particular, by Legal-URN. Two cases are used to illustrate the importance of interpretation and how Legal-URN facilitates it.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on TEchnical and LEgal aspects of data pRivacy and SEcurity\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on TEchnical and LEgal aspects of data pRivacy and SEcurity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TELERISE.2015.13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE/ACM 1st International Workshop on TEchnical and LEgal aspects of data pRivacy and SEcurity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TELERISE.2015.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

规章常常被写成公开的规范。因此,支持遵从性的系统的开发涉及到解释。通常,法规遵从人员会考虑几种替代解决方案。比较可行性并决定选择哪个替代方案是重要的任务。在本文中,我们的目标是展示需求工程工具,特别是Legal-URN,如何支持对几种解释的影响进行分析。两个案例被用来说明解释的重要性,以及Legal-URN如何促进解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Legal Interpretation in Business Process Compliance
Regulations are often written as open norms. Thus, the development of systems that support compliance involves interpretation. Often, compliance officers consider several alternative solutions. Comparing the feasibility and deciding which alternative to select are important tasks. In this paper, we aim to show how analyzing the impact of several interpretation can be supported by requirements engineering tools, in particular, by Legal-URN. Two cases are used to illustrate the importance of interpretation and how Legal-URN facilitates it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信