生产脆弱的生物:后流行病时代的人与动物关系

Kiheung Kim
{"title":"生产脆弱的生物:后流行病时代的人与动物关系","authors":"Kiheung Kim","doi":"10.37123/th.2022.12.111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article focuses on disease experience and its containment policy in South Korea. In particular, the outbreak of Covid-19 shifts the main idea of how to control the disease. Koreans experienced repeated and cyclic outbreaks of human and animal infectious diseases since the beginning of the new millennium. The experiences reflected in the containment policy in human and animal diseases. This research is interested in a fact that the public health policy produces new vulnerable beings, which include humans(migrant and part-time workers) and non-humans(domestic and wild animals) through preventive culling and spatialized approach to contain infectious diseases. Aggressive and centralized policy outsources risks of diseases onto vulnerable beings. Although global health organizations have put forward the concept of ‘One Health’, a holistic and interdisciplinary approach to solve the problem and promote health of humans, animals and the ecosystem, it is not suffice to stop from producing those vulnerable beings. This article shows how the space-based containment has been adopted as a public health strategy, and how the vulnerabilities of humans and animals in ecosystems were intensified in the process of disease prevention even in the One Health frame.","PeriodicalId":443880,"journal":{"name":"Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Producing the Vulnerable beings: The Human-Animal Relations in the Post-Pandemic Era\",\"authors\":\"Kiheung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.37123/th.2022.12.111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article focuses on disease experience and its containment policy in South Korea. In particular, the outbreak of Covid-19 shifts the main idea of how to control the disease. Koreans experienced repeated and cyclic outbreaks of human and animal infectious diseases since the beginning of the new millennium. The experiences reflected in the containment policy in human and animal diseases. This research is interested in a fact that the public health policy produces new vulnerable beings, which include humans(migrant and part-time workers) and non-humans(domestic and wild animals) through preventive culling and spatialized approach to contain infectious diseases. Aggressive and centralized policy outsources risks of diseases onto vulnerable beings. Although global health organizations have put forward the concept of ‘One Health’, a holistic and interdisciplinary approach to solve the problem and promote health of humans, animals and the ecosystem, it is not suffice to stop from producing those vulnerable beings. This article shows how the space-based containment has been adopted as a public health strategy, and how the vulnerabilities of humans and animals in ecosystems were intensified in the process of disease prevention even in the One Health frame.\",\"PeriodicalId\":443880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37123/th.2022.12.111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sookmyung Research Institute of Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37123/th.2022.12.111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要介绍韩国的疫情经验及其防控政策。特别是,Covid-19的爆发改变了如何控制疾病的主要思想。进入新千年以来,韩国经历了人类和动物传染病的反复和周期性爆发。人类和动物疾病的控制政策所反映的经验。本研究感兴趣的是公共卫生政策通过预防性扑杀和空间化方法控制传染病,产生了新的弱势群体,包括人类(移民和兼职工人)和非人类(家畜和野生动物)。激进和集中的政策将疾病的风险外包给了弱势群体。尽管全球卫生组织提出了“同一个健康”的概念,这是一种整体的、跨学科的方法来解决问题,促进人类、动物和生态系统的健康,但这不足以阻止这些脆弱的生物的产生。本文展示了如何将天基遏制作为一项公共卫生战略,以及即使在“同一个健康”框架下,人类和动物在生态系统中的脆弱性如何在疾病预防过程中得到加强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Producing the Vulnerable beings: The Human-Animal Relations in the Post-Pandemic Era
This article focuses on disease experience and its containment policy in South Korea. In particular, the outbreak of Covid-19 shifts the main idea of how to control the disease. Koreans experienced repeated and cyclic outbreaks of human and animal infectious diseases since the beginning of the new millennium. The experiences reflected in the containment policy in human and animal diseases. This research is interested in a fact that the public health policy produces new vulnerable beings, which include humans(migrant and part-time workers) and non-humans(domestic and wild animals) through preventive culling and spatialized approach to contain infectious diseases. Aggressive and centralized policy outsources risks of diseases onto vulnerable beings. Although global health organizations have put forward the concept of ‘One Health’, a holistic and interdisciplinary approach to solve the problem and promote health of humans, animals and the ecosystem, it is not suffice to stop from producing those vulnerable beings. This article shows how the space-based containment has been adopted as a public health strategy, and how the vulnerabilities of humans and animals in ecosystems were intensified in the process of disease prevention even in the One Health frame.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信