抗生素处方和社会人口剥夺-从一般指数到特定领域

R. Armon
{"title":"抗生素处方和社会人口剥夺-从一般指数到特定领域","authors":"R. Armon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3263497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Analyse the variance associated with the domains of the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (2015) as predictors of antibiotic prescribing. Methods: Deprivation and prescribing data for Clinical Commissioning Groups in England were collected, tabulated and used to build regression models characterising the relationship between antibiotic prescribing and indices of deprivation in the domains of education, health, employment, income, services and living environment. Results: The Index and 6 out of the 7 deprivation domains predicted antibiotic prescribing as reported (<0.001) and explained 21-38% of the variance. The domain of Education, Training and Skills emerged as a key factor (R2=0.38266) whereas employment explained as much variance in prescribing as health (R2=0.23408 and 0.23549 respectively). Conclusions: Individual indices of deprivation such as education and employment can account for the variance in antibiotic prescribing to a similar or a greater extent than health or the Index as a whole. Predictive indices provide new insights into the ways in which socio-demographic deprivation affects prescribing and can serve in the design of future more targeted interventions, such as those to lower unwarranted antibiotic prescribing.","PeriodicalId":430418,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases eJournal","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antibiotic Prescribing and Sociodemographic Deprivation – From General Index to Specific Domains\",\"authors\":\"R. Armon\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3263497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Analyse the variance associated with the domains of the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (2015) as predictors of antibiotic prescribing. Methods: Deprivation and prescribing data for Clinical Commissioning Groups in England were collected, tabulated and used to build regression models characterising the relationship between antibiotic prescribing and indices of deprivation in the domains of education, health, employment, income, services and living environment. Results: The Index and 6 out of the 7 deprivation domains predicted antibiotic prescribing as reported (<0.001) and explained 21-38% of the variance. The domain of Education, Training and Skills emerged as a key factor (R2=0.38266) whereas employment explained as much variance in prescribing as health (R2=0.23408 and 0.23549 respectively). Conclusions: Individual indices of deprivation such as education and employment can account for the variance in antibiotic prescribing to a similar or a greater extent than health or the Index as a whole. Predictive indices provide new insights into the ways in which socio-demographic deprivation affects prescribing and can serve in the design of future more targeted interventions, such as those to lower unwarranted antibiotic prescribing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Diseases eJournal\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-10-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Diseases eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3263497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3263497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:分析英语多重剥夺指数(2015)域作为抗生素处方预测因子的相关方差。方法:收集英国临床委托组的剥夺和处方数据,将其制成表格,并用于建立回归模型,表征抗生素处方与教育、健康、就业、收入、服务和生活环境等领域的剥夺指数之间的关系。结果:该指数和7个剥夺域中的6个预测了报告的抗生素处方(<0.001),并解释了21-38%的方差。教育、培训和技能领域成为一个关键因素(R2=0.38266),而就业对处方的解释与健康一样多(R2分别=0.23408和0.23549)。结论:教育和就业等剥夺指标可以在与健康或整体指标相似或更大程度上解释抗生素处方的差异。预测指数为社会人口剥夺影响处方的方式提供了新的见解,并可用于设计未来更有针对性的干预措施,例如减少无根据的抗生素处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Antibiotic Prescribing and Sociodemographic Deprivation – From General Index to Specific Domains
Objectives: Analyse the variance associated with the domains of the English Index of Multiple Deprivation (2015) as predictors of antibiotic prescribing. Methods: Deprivation and prescribing data for Clinical Commissioning Groups in England were collected, tabulated and used to build regression models characterising the relationship between antibiotic prescribing and indices of deprivation in the domains of education, health, employment, income, services and living environment. Results: The Index and 6 out of the 7 deprivation domains predicted antibiotic prescribing as reported (<0.001) and explained 21-38% of the variance. The domain of Education, Training and Skills emerged as a key factor (R2=0.38266) whereas employment explained as much variance in prescribing as health (R2=0.23408 and 0.23549 respectively). Conclusions: Individual indices of deprivation such as education and employment can account for the variance in antibiotic prescribing to a similar or a greater extent than health or the Index as a whole. Predictive indices provide new insights into the ways in which socio-demographic deprivation affects prescribing and can serve in the design of future more targeted interventions, such as those to lower unwarranted antibiotic prescribing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信