亚里士多德《尼各马可伦理学》中的上帝与善

Epoch Pub Date : 2010-04-01 DOI:10.5840/EPOCHE201015117
Vijay Mascarenhas
{"title":"亚里士多德《尼各马可伦理学》中的上帝与善","authors":"Vijay Mascarenhas","doi":"10.5840/EPOCHE201015117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"By examining the systematic integration of theology, ethics, and teleology in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, I address four key interpretational aporiai: the apparently illogicality of the opening lines, the apparent contradiction between practical virtue and contemplation being the highest good, the \"dominant\" v. \"inclusivist\" views of eudaimonia, and the immanence v. transcendence of God. I show how proper attention to the link between Aristotle's conception of the Good as \"that at which all things aim\" and God as the prime unmoved mover, as well as an appreciation of the overall \"aristocratic\" context of Aristotelian philosophy, provides a new way of dealing with these aporiai that renders them less perplexing and problematic, while avoiding un-Aristotelian, anachronistic readings.","PeriodicalId":202733,"journal":{"name":"Epoch","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"God and the Good in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics\",\"authors\":\"Vijay Mascarenhas\",\"doi\":\"10.5840/EPOCHE201015117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"By examining the systematic integration of theology, ethics, and teleology in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, I address four key interpretational aporiai: the apparently illogicality of the opening lines, the apparent contradiction between practical virtue and contemplation being the highest good, the \\\"dominant\\\" v. \\\"inclusivist\\\" views of eudaimonia, and the immanence v. transcendence of God. I show how proper attention to the link between Aristotle's conception of the Good as \\\"that at which all things aim\\\" and God as the prime unmoved mover, as well as an appreciation of the overall \\\"aristocratic\\\" context of Aristotelian philosophy, provides a new way of dealing with these aporiai that renders them less perplexing and problematic, while avoiding un-Aristotelian, anachronistic readings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202733,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Epoch\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Epoch\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epoch","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/EPOCHE201015117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

通过考察亚里士多德《尼各马可伦理学》中神学、伦理学和目的论的系统整合,我提出了四个关键的解释性问题:开头几行明显的不合逻辑,实践美德和沉思作为最高善之间的明显矛盾,“主导”v。“包容主义”的幸福观,以及上帝的内在性与超越性。我展示了如何适当关注亚里士多德的“善”概念之间的联系,即“一切事物的目标”和上帝作为主要的不动的推动者,以及对亚里士多德哲学的整体“贵族”背景的欣赏,提供了一种处理这些aporiai的新方法,使它们不那么令人困惑和有问题,同时避免非亚里士多德的,不合时宜的阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
God and the Good in Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics
By examining the systematic integration of theology, ethics, and teleology in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, I address four key interpretational aporiai: the apparently illogicality of the opening lines, the apparent contradiction between practical virtue and contemplation being the highest good, the "dominant" v. "inclusivist" views of eudaimonia, and the immanence v. transcendence of God. I show how proper attention to the link between Aristotle's conception of the Good as "that at which all things aim" and God as the prime unmoved mover, as well as an appreciation of the overall "aristocratic" context of Aristotelian philosophy, provides a new way of dealing with these aporiai that renders them less perplexing and problematic, while avoiding un-Aristotelian, anachronistic readings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信