软件工程教育中的需求对分析

Kabas Albakry, M. Kamalrudin
{"title":"软件工程教育中的需求对分析","authors":"Kabas Albakry, M. Kamalrudin","doi":"10.1109/MYSEC.2011.6140641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Requirements Analysis and Design is found to be one of the crucial subjects in Software Engineering education. Students need to have deeper understanding before they could start to analyse and design the requirements, either using models or textual descriptions. However, the outcomes of their analysis are always vague and error-prone. We assume that this issue can be handled if “pair analysis” is conducted where all students are assigned with partners following the concept of pair-programming. To prove this, we have conducted a small preliminary evaluation to compare the outcomes of solo work and “pair analysis” work for three different groups of students. The performance, efficacy and students' satisfaction and confidence level are evaluated.","PeriodicalId":137714,"journal":{"name":"2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pair analysis of requirements in software engineering education\",\"authors\":\"Kabas Albakry, M. Kamalrudin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MYSEC.2011.6140641\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Requirements Analysis and Design is found to be one of the crucial subjects in Software Engineering education. Students need to have deeper understanding before they could start to analyse and design the requirements, either using models or textual descriptions. However, the outcomes of their analysis are always vague and error-prone. We assume that this issue can be handled if “pair analysis” is conducted where all students are assigned with partners following the concept of pair-programming. To prove this, we have conducted a small preliminary evaluation to compare the outcomes of solo work and “pair analysis” work for three different groups of students. The performance, efficacy and students' satisfaction and confidence level are evaluated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MYSEC.2011.6140641\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 Malaysian Conference in Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MYSEC.2011.6140641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

需求分析与设计是软件工程教育的重要学科之一。学生需要有更深入的了解,然后才能开始分析和设计需求,无论是使用模型还是文本描述。然而,他们的分析结果总是模糊且容易出错。我们假设,如果按照“结对编程”的概念,将所有学生分配给伙伴进行“结对分析”,就可以解决这个问题。为了证明这一点,我们对三组不同的学生进行了一个小型的初步评估,以比较单独作业和“配对分析”作业的结果。评估教学效果、效果及学生满意度和信心水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pair analysis of requirements in software engineering education
Requirements Analysis and Design is found to be one of the crucial subjects in Software Engineering education. Students need to have deeper understanding before they could start to analyse and design the requirements, either using models or textual descriptions. However, the outcomes of their analysis are always vague and error-prone. We assume that this issue can be handled if “pair analysis” is conducted where all students are assigned with partners following the concept of pair-programming. To prove this, we have conducted a small preliminary evaluation to compare the outcomes of solo work and “pair analysis” work for three different groups of students. The performance, efficacy and students' satisfaction and confidence level are evaluated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信