如何使实用类方法中的协方差成为静态类型安全的?

Axel Schmolitzky, M. Evered, J. L. Keedy, G. Menger
{"title":"如何使实用类方法中的协方差成为静态类型安全的?","authors":"Axel Schmolitzky, M. Evered, J. L. Keedy, G. Menger","doi":"10.1109/TOOLS.1999.809426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Binary class methods are often more suitable for modelling binary operations than binary instance methods. Allowing covariant parameter type adaptations in class methods can make them even more attractive. We discuss the implications of covariant class methods on type safety. We discuss two examples, one type-safe at run-time and the other not, and formulate type rules that make it possible to identify the difference at compile-time.","PeriodicalId":272695,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems. TOOLS 32","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How can covariance in pragmatical class methods be made statically type-safe?\",\"authors\":\"Axel Schmolitzky, M. Evered, J. L. Keedy, G. Menger\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TOOLS.1999.809426\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Binary class methods are often more suitable for modelling binary operations than binary instance methods. Allowing covariant parameter type adaptations in class methods can make them even more attractive. We discuss the implications of covariant class methods on type safety. We discuss two examples, one type-safe at run-time and the other not, and formulate type rules that make it possible to identify the difference at compile-time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":272695,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems. TOOLS 32\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems. TOOLS 32\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/TOOLS.1999.809426\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems. TOOLS 32","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TOOLS.1999.809426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

二进制类方法通常比二进制实例方法更适合于对二进制操作建模。在类方法中允许协变参数类型调整可以使它们更有吸引力。讨论协变类方法对类型安全的影响。我们将讨论两个示例,一个在运行时是类型安全的,另一个不是,并制定类型规则,以便在编译时识别它们之间的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How can covariance in pragmatical class methods be made statically type-safe?
Binary class methods are often more suitable for modelling binary operations than binary instance methods. Allowing covariant parameter type adaptations in class methods can make them even more attractive. We discuss the implications of covariant class methods on type safety. We discuss two examples, one type-safe at run-time and the other not, and formulate type rules that make it possible to identify the difference at compile-time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信