{"title":"变脉冲长度下GMR磁头的ESD灵敏度","authors":"D. Guarisco, M. Li","doi":"10.1109/EOSESD.2000.890092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"9 Gb/in/sup 2/ GMR heads were subjected to electrical overstress using square pulses of variable duration. The pulse length was varied between 4 ns and 80 ms. For each pulse length, the magnetic and physical failure thresholds were measured via a quasi-static test. It is found that for long pulses (/spl gsim/1 /spl mu/s) the GMR sensors fail at constant power, whereas at very short times (<100 ns), the system starts to gradually transition to an adiabatic regime where failure occurs at constant energy.","PeriodicalId":332394,"journal":{"name":"Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings 2000 (IEEE Cat. No.00TH8476)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESD sensitivity of GMR heads at variable pulse length\",\"authors\":\"D. Guarisco, M. Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EOSESD.2000.890092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"9 Gb/in/sup 2/ GMR heads were subjected to electrical overstress using square pulses of variable duration. The pulse length was varied between 4 ns and 80 ms. For each pulse length, the magnetic and physical failure thresholds were measured via a quasi-static test. It is found that for long pulses (/spl gsim/1 /spl mu/s) the GMR sensors fail at constant power, whereas at very short times (<100 ns), the system starts to gradually transition to an adiabatic regime where failure occurs at constant energy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":332394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings 2000 (IEEE Cat. No.00TH8476)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings 2000 (IEEE Cat. No.00TH8476)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EOSESD.2000.890092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electrical Overstress/Electrostatic Discharge Symposium Proceedings 2000 (IEEE Cat. No.00TH8476)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EOSESD.2000.890092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
ESD sensitivity of GMR heads at variable pulse length
9 Gb/in/sup 2/ GMR heads were subjected to electrical overstress using square pulses of variable duration. The pulse length was varied between 4 ns and 80 ms. For each pulse length, the magnetic and physical failure thresholds were measured via a quasi-static test. It is found that for long pulses (/spl gsim/1 /spl mu/s) the GMR sensors fail at constant power, whereas at very short times (<100 ns), the system starts to gradually transition to an adiabatic regime where failure occurs at constant energy.