物质、多元文化和创客空间

Aspa Baroutsis, A. Woods
{"title":"物质、多元文化和创客空间","authors":"Aspa Baroutsis, A. Woods","doi":"10.4324/9781315143040-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With increasing digitization and multimodality within society, text production forms a key element of what it means to be literate in today’s literate culture – interactions between children and young people and digital texts, tools and resources are embedded in everyday practices. This shift – along with changes to work practices and the economy - has also resulted in text production becoming a more collaborative practice. When we think about literacies for current times – we usually think about multimodality and digital technologies. \n \nDigital tools, resources and technologies have had a radical effect on how we produce texts, how we communicate with each other, the kinds of interactions we can have – the very social organization of the spaces in which we engage. When we acknowledge this, we are acknowledging that everyday life involves an entanglement of social with material; human with non-human; technological and non-technological. These sociomaterial ways of thinking challenge our preoccupation with single individuals using literacy tools (Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuk 2011) whether traditional print or digital in order to get things done. \n \nFrom this way of thinking, ‘technology’ in whatever form is valuable, meaningful and worth studying as people actually engage with it to get things done. But we move beyond being interested just in what a young child can ‘do’ with technology toward thinking about how the material as well as the discursive and the virtual works with the human and non-human world. It is this decoupling of knowing and action from a strictly human centred ‘being’ or ontology that is a key contribution of sociomaterial theories (Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuk 2011). \n \nIn this chapter we consider literacies and learning to be literate for current times and thinking, and then present data from one study of how children learn to write and produce texts in their early school years. We highlight data collected as part of one design-based research project from this larger study, where teachers and researchers worked together to plan and implement a series of lessons which began with opportunities for children to engage in makerspace activities, before moving to produce texts in other modes. We are particularly interested in the materiality of these activities and how they shifted the roles of children and adults in the classroom space.","PeriodicalId":227996,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge International Handbook of Learning with Technology in Early Childhood","volume":"2016 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Materialities, multiliteracies and makerspaces\",\"authors\":\"Aspa Baroutsis, A. Woods\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315143040-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With increasing digitization and multimodality within society, text production forms a key element of what it means to be literate in today’s literate culture – interactions between children and young people and digital texts, tools and resources are embedded in everyday practices. This shift – along with changes to work practices and the economy - has also resulted in text production becoming a more collaborative practice. When we think about literacies for current times – we usually think about multimodality and digital technologies. \\n \\nDigital tools, resources and technologies have had a radical effect on how we produce texts, how we communicate with each other, the kinds of interactions we can have – the very social organization of the spaces in which we engage. When we acknowledge this, we are acknowledging that everyday life involves an entanglement of social with material; human with non-human; technological and non-technological. These sociomaterial ways of thinking challenge our preoccupation with single individuals using literacy tools (Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuk 2011) whether traditional print or digital in order to get things done. \\n \\nFrom this way of thinking, ‘technology’ in whatever form is valuable, meaningful and worth studying as people actually engage with it to get things done. But we move beyond being interested just in what a young child can ‘do’ with technology toward thinking about how the material as well as the discursive and the virtual works with the human and non-human world. It is this decoupling of knowing and action from a strictly human centred ‘being’ or ontology that is a key contribution of sociomaterial theories (Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuk 2011). \\n \\nIn this chapter we consider literacies and learning to be literate for current times and thinking, and then present data from one study of how children learn to write and produce texts in their early school years. We highlight data collected as part of one design-based research project from this larger study, where teachers and researchers worked together to plan and implement a series of lessons which began with opportunities for children to engage in makerspace activities, before moving to produce texts in other modes. We are particularly interested in the materiality of these activities and how they shifted the roles of children and adults in the classroom space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge International Handbook of Learning with Technology in Early Childhood\",\"volume\":\"2016 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge International Handbook of Learning with Technology in Early Childhood\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315143040-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge International Handbook of Learning with Technology in Early Childhood","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315143040-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

随着社会日益数字化和多模态化,文本生产成为当今识字文化中识字的关键要素——儿童和年轻人之间的互动以及数字文本、工具和资源已融入日常实践。这种转变——以及工作实践和经济的变化——也导致文本制作成为一种更具协作性的实践。当我们想到当今时代的识字能力时,我们通常会想到多模态和数字技术。数字工具、资源和技术对我们如何制作文本、如何相互交流、我们可以进行的各种互动以及我们所参与的空间的社会组织产生了根本性的影响。当我们承认这一点时,我们就承认日常生活涉及到社会与物质的纠缠;人类与非人类;技术和非技术。这些社会物质的思维方式挑战了我们对单个人使用读写工具(Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuk 2011)的关注,无论是传统的印刷工具还是数字工具,都是为了完成任务。从这种思维方式来看,任何形式的“技术”都是有价值的,有意义的,值得研究的,因为人们实际上是用它来完成事情的。但是,我们的兴趣已经超越了仅仅是一个小孩子可以用技术“做”什么,而转向思考物质、话语和虚拟如何与人类和非人类世界合作。正是这种认识和行动与严格以人为中心的“存在”或本体论的脱钩,是社会物质理论的关键贡献(Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuk 2011)。在这一章中,我们考虑识字和学习识字,以适应当前的时代和思维,然后提出一项关于儿童如何在早期上学时学习写作和创作文本的研究数据。我们强调了从这个更大的研究中收集的数据,这些数据是一个基于设计的研究项目的一部分,在这个研究中,教师和研究人员共同规划和实施了一系列课程,这些课程从让孩子们有机会参与创客空间活动开始,然后再以其他模式制作文本。我们特别感兴趣的是这些活动的物质性,以及它们如何改变儿童和成人在课堂空间中的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Materialities, multiliteracies and makerspaces
With increasing digitization and multimodality within society, text production forms a key element of what it means to be literate in today’s literate culture – interactions between children and young people and digital texts, tools and resources are embedded in everyday practices. This shift – along with changes to work practices and the economy - has also resulted in text production becoming a more collaborative practice. When we think about literacies for current times – we usually think about multimodality and digital technologies. Digital tools, resources and technologies have had a radical effect on how we produce texts, how we communicate with each other, the kinds of interactions we can have – the very social organization of the spaces in which we engage. When we acknowledge this, we are acknowledging that everyday life involves an entanglement of social with material; human with non-human; technological and non-technological. These sociomaterial ways of thinking challenge our preoccupation with single individuals using literacy tools (Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuk 2011) whether traditional print or digital in order to get things done. From this way of thinking, ‘technology’ in whatever form is valuable, meaningful and worth studying as people actually engage with it to get things done. But we move beyond being interested just in what a young child can ‘do’ with technology toward thinking about how the material as well as the discursive and the virtual works with the human and non-human world. It is this decoupling of knowing and action from a strictly human centred ‘being’ or ontology that is a key contribution of sociomaterial theories (Fenwick, Edwards, & Sawchuk 2011). In this chapter we consider literacies and learning to be literate for current times and thinking, and then present data from one study of how children learn to write and produce texts in their early school years. We highlight data collected as part of one design-based research project from this larger study, where teachers and researchers worked together to plan and implement a series of lessons which began with opportunities for children to engage in makerspace activities, before moving to produce texts in other modes. We are particularly interested in the materiality of these activities and how they shifted the roles of children and adults in the classroom space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信