1970-1987年农业财政危机中破产的社会与生态关联

J. P. Smith
{"title":"1970-1987年农业财政危机中破产的社会与生态关联","authors":"J. P. Smith","doi":"10.17161/STR.1808.5010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the last two decades, social scientists have accepted the premise that farm modernization resulted in larger, technologically sophisticated, and capital intensive farming units. In addition, it was a foregone conclusion that modernization led to fewer farm units. Several historians (Danbom, 1979; Shover, 1976; Fite, 1984) have described the historical origins of the process of farm modernization. A classic analysis of the structural and ideological change in American agriculture was presented by Rohrer and Douglas (1969) in The Agrarian Transition: Dualism and Change. This work generated a rethinking of the centrality and persistence of Agrarian ideology (Flinn and Johnson, 1974; Buttel and Flinn, 1975). While the general thesis of an agrarian transition is widely accepted, questions remain about the pace or rate of the transition. Some historians have viewed this transition in epochal terms; the transition is likened to an \"agrarian twilight,\" a slow fade. Other historians and social commentators have noted an uneven, non linear path for farm modernization and agricultural development in general. Some events like a technological breakthrough or a fiscal crisis can hasten the rate of modernization in the agricultural sector (Campbell, et al., 1984). Agricultural growth or decline, then, can be viewed in stages, and the factors that influence each stage can be studied. Despite the torrent of press releases about increased farm income and government transfer payments, after 1981 it became apparent that the farm sector and rural communities were facing dire straits. The \"fiscal crisis\" of the early 1980's actually emerged slowly after 1978. It was an institutional crisis that involved the farm sector and agribusiness. It was not a simple problem of low cash flow for a select group of poor managers as it has been viewed by economists and management specialists. To understand the impact of the fiscal crisis, one needs to conceive of farming as a family business and an occupation that is fostered and nurtured by the parent generation, community and the state. When a farmer leaves farming, it is far more complex than in prior years because","PeriodicalId":338053,"journal":{"name":"Social thought & research","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Social and Ecological Correlates of Bankruptcy During the Farm Fiscal Crisis, 1970-1987\",\"authors\":\"J. P. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/STR.1808.5010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For the last two decades, social scientists have accepted the premise that farm modernization resulted in larger, technologically sophisticated, and capital intensive farming units. In addition, it was a foregone conclusion that modernization led to fewer farm units. Several historians (Danbom, 1979; Shover, 1976; Fite, 1984) have described the historical origins of the process of farm modernization. A classic analysis of the structural and ideological change in American agriculture was presented by Rohrer and Douglas (1969) in The Agrarian Transition: Dualism and Change. This work generated a rethinking of the centrality and persistence of Agrarian ideology (Flinn and Johnson, 1974; Buttel and Flinn, 1975). While the general thesis of an agrarian transition is widely accepted, questions remain about the pace or rate of the transition. Some historians have viewed this transition in epochal terms; the transition is likened to an \\\"agrarian twilight,\\\" a slow fade. Other historians and social commentators have noted an uneven, non linear path for farm modernization and agricultural development in general. Some events like a technological breakthrough or a fiscal crisis can hasten the rate of modernization in the agricultural sector (Campbell, et al., 1984). Agricultural growth or decline, then, can be viewed in stages, and the factors that influence each stage can be studied. Despite the torrent of press releases about increased farm income and government transfer payments, after 1981 it became apparent that the farm sector and rural communities were facing dire straits. The \\\"fiscal crisis\\\" of the early 1980's actually emerged slowly after 1978. It was an institutional crisis that involved the farm sector and agribusiness. It was not a simple problem of low cash flow for a select group of poor managers as it has been viewed by economists and management specialists. To understand the impact of the fiscal crisis, one needs to conceive of farming as a family business and an occupation that is fostered and nurtured by the parent generation, community and the state. When a farmer leaves farming, it is far more complex than in prior years because\",\"PeriodicalId\":338053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social thought & research\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social thought & research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social thought & research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.5010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的二十年里,社会科学家已经接受了这样一个前提,即农业现代化导致了规模更大、技术更先进和资本密集的农业单位。此外,现代化导致农场单位减少是一个意料之中的结论。几位历史学家(Danbom, 1979;推,1976;菲特(Fite, 1984)描述了农业现代化进程的历史起源。Rohrer和Douglas(1969)在《农业转型:二元论与变化》一书中对美国农业的结构和意识形态变化进行了经典分析。这项工作引发了对农业意识形态的中心地位和持久性的重新思考(Flinn和Johnson, 1974;巴特尔和弗林,1975)。虽然农业转型的一般论点被广泛接受,但关于转型的速度和速度的问题仍然存在。一些历史学家从划时代的角度看待这一转变;这种转变被比作“农业的黄昏”,是一种缓慢的衰落。其他历史学家和社会评论家注意到,农业现代化和农业发展总体上是一条不平衡的非线性道路。一些事件,如技术突破或财政危机可以加快现代化的速度在农业部门(坎贝尔等人,1984年)。因此,农业的增长或下降可以分阶段来看,并且可以研究影响每个阶段的因素。尽管大量新闻报道增加了农业收入和政府转移支付,但1981年之后,农业部门和农村社区显然面临着严峻的困境。1980年代初的“财政危机”实际上是在1978年之后缓慢出现的。这是一场涉及农业部门和农业综合企业的制度性危机。这并不像经济学家和管理专家所认为的那样,是少数糟糕管理者现金流不足的简单问题。要理解财政危机的影响,我们需要把农业想象成一项家族企业,一项由父辈、社区和国家培育和培养的职业。当农民离开农场时,情况要比前几年复杂得多,因为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Social and Ecological Correlates of Bankruptcy During the Farm Fiscal Crisis, 1970-1987
For the last two decades, social scientists have accepted the premise that farm modernization resulted in larger, technologically sophisticated, and capital intensive farming units. In addition, it was a foregone conclusion that modernization led to fewer farm units. Several historians (Danbom, 1979; Shover, 1976; Fite, 1984) have described the historical origins of the process of farm modernization. A classic analysis of the structural and ideological change in American agriculture was presented by Rohrer and Douglas (1969) in The Agrarian Transition: Dualism and Change. This work generated a rethinking of the centrality and persistence of Agrarian ideology (Flinn and Johnson, 1974; Buttel and Flinn, 1975). While the general thesis of an agrarian transition is widely accepted, questions remain about the pace or rate of the transition. Some historians have viewed this transition in epochal terms; the transition is likened to an "agrarian twilight," a slow fade. Other historians and social commentators have noted an uneven, non linear path for farm modernization and agricultural development in general. Some events like a technological breakthrough or a fiscal crisis can hasten the rate of modernization in the agricultural sector (Campbell, et al., 1984). Agricultural growth or decline, then, can be viewed in stages, and the factors that influence each stage can be studied. Despite the torrent of press releases about increased farm income and government transfer payments, after 1981 it became apparent that the farm sector and rural communities were facing dire straits. The "fiscal crisis" of the early 1980's actually emerged slowly after 1978. It was an institutional crisis that involved the farm sector and agribusiness. It was not a simple problem of low cash flow for a select group of poor managers as it has been viewed by economists and management specialists. To understand the impact of the fiscal crisis, one needs to conceive of farming as a family business and an occupation that is fostered and nurtured by the parent generation, community and the state. When a farmer leaves farming, it is far more complex than in prior years because
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信