{"title":"检查UML序列图的组合,以确定时间不一致","authors":"Xuandong Li, J. Lilius","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2000.896694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For real-time systems, UML sequence diagrams describe interactions among objects, which show scenarios of the system behaviour. A simple UML sequence diagram describes exactly one scenario. For describing multiple scenarios and specifying real-time systems, we need to consider the compositions of UML sequence diagrams. In this paper, we introduce high-level graphs to describe compositions of UML sequence diagrams, and develop an algorithm for checking them for timing inconsistencies.","PeriodicalId":404621,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engeering Conference. APSEC 2000","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Checking compositions of UML sequence diagrams for timing inconsistency\",\"authors\":\"Xuandong Li, J. Lilius\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/APSEC.2000.896694\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For real-time systems, UML sequence diagrams describe interactions among objects, which show scenarios of the system behaviour. A simple UML sequence diagram describes exactly one scenario. For describing multiple scenarios and specifying real-time systems, we need to consider the compositions of UML sequence diagrams. In this paper, we introduce high-level graphs to describe compositions of UML sequence diagrams, and develop an algorithm for checking them for timing inconsistencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":404621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engeering Conference. APSEC 2000\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engeering Conference. APSEC 2000\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2000.896694\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engeering Conference. APSEC 2000","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2000.896694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Checking compositions of UML sequence diagrams for timing inconsistency
For real-time systems, UML sequence diagrams describe interactions among objects, which show scenarios of the system behaviour. A simple UML sequence diagram describes exactly one scenario. For describing multiple scenarios and specifying real-time systems, we need to consider the compositions of UML sequence diagrams. In this paper, we introduce high-level graphs to describe compositions of UML sequence diagrams, and develop an algorithm for checking them for timing inconsistencies.