反腐败立法中的非法利益:法律规制问题

О. Vynohrad, P. Kovalska
{"title":"反腐败立法中的非法利益:法律规制问题","authors":"О. Vynohrad, P. Kovalska","doi":"10.32755/sjlaw.2021.02.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The types and meaning of the main methods of preventing corruption are examined in the article. Administrative methods of combating corruption are identified among them. They are divided into two groups: rule-making (adoption of relevant law); law enforcement (application of law). The importance of proper legislative regulation in liquidating corruption is outlined. The formation of anti-corruption legislation, which has been going on for a long time, is revealed and it is noted that to date anti-corruption legislation has undergone a significant transformation and changed its purpose that is “prevention” instead of “struggle”. Emphasis is placed on innovations and reforms contained in the updated anti-corruption legislation. The provisions of statutary acts, which enshrine illegal benefit, are given. For carrying out a detailed analysis, the scholars’ positions on the current legislation on the definition of “illegal benefit” were analyzed. It revealed differences in existing approaches to the essential features of this phenomenon. The concept and features of a gift are analyzed in order to distinguish it from the illegal benefit and identify the main reasons for this. The importance of clear regulation of illegal benefit and gifts in order to avoid incorrect classification of violated anti-corruption legislation was emphasized. After analyzing the essence of “illegal benefit” and “gift”, it was found out that common to the subject of gift and illegal benefit was to receive both materially defined and things that do not have a monetary equivalent and material reflection. A sign that allows to distinguish a gift from an illegal benefit is the sign “without any legal grounds” for receiving an illegal benefit and “gratuitousness and receipt/gift at a price below the minimum market”. It is the last part of the component definition of a gift that testifies to the value characteristics of a gift. It is noted that taking into account the fact that since the difference between a gift and an illegal benefit is unclear, it may lead to incorrect classification of violated anti-corruption legislation. Key words: illegal benefit, gift, anti-corruption legislation, corruption offense, corruption-related offenses, criminal liability, administrative liability.","PeriodicalId":150888,"journal":{"name":"ScientifiScientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illegal benefit in anti-corruption legislation: problems of legal regulation\",\"authors\":\"О. Vynohrad, P. Kovalska\",\"doi\":\"10.32755/sjlaw.2021.02.057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The types and meaning of the main methods of preventing corruption are examined in the article. Administrative methods of combating corruption are identified among them. They are divided into two groups: rule-making (adoption of relevant law); law enforcement (application of law). The importance of proper legislative regulation in liquidating corruption is outlined. The formation of anti-corruption legislation, which has been going on for a long time, is revealed and it is noted that to date anti-corruption legislation has undergone a significant transformation and changed its purpose that is “prevention” instead of “struggle”. Emphasis is placed on innovations and reforms contained in the updated anti-corruption legislation. The provisions of statutary acts, which enshrine illegal benefit, are given. For carrying out a detailed analysis, the scholars’ positions on the current legislation on the definition of “illegal benefit” were analyzed. It revealed differences in existing approaches to the essential features of this phenomenon. The concept and features of a gift are analyzed in order to distinguish it from the illegal benefit and identify the main reasons for this. The importance of clear regulation of illegal benefit and gifts in order to avoid incorrect classification of violated anti-corruption legislation was emphasized. After analyzing the essence of “illegal benefit” and “gift”, it was found out that common to the subject of gift and illegal benefit was to receive both materially defined and things that do not have a monetary equivalent and material reflection. A sign that allows to distinguish a gift from an illegal benefit is the sign “without any legal grounds” for receiving an illegal benefit and “gratuitousness and receipt/gift at a price below the minimum market”. It is the last part of the component definition of a gift that testifies to the value characteristics of a gift. It is noted that taking into account the fact that since the difference between a gift and an illegal benefit is unclear, it may lead to incorrect classification of violated anti-corruption legislation. Key words: illegal benefit, gift, anti-corruption legislation, corruption offense, corruption-related offenses, criminal liability, administrative liability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":150888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ScientifiScientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ScientifiScientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32755/sjlaw.2021.02.057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ScientifiScientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32755/sjlaw.2021.02.057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了预防腐败的主要方法的类型和意义。其中确定了打击腐败的行政方法。他们被分为两组:规则制定(通过相关法律);执法(法律的适用)。概述了适当的立法规制在清算腐败中的重要性。揭示了反腐立法的形成过程,指出迄今为止,反腐败立法发生了重大转变,其宗旨由“斗争”转变为“预防”。重点放在更新的反腐败立法中所载的创新和改革。对认定非法利益的成文法作了规定。为了进行详细的分析,分析了学者们对现行立法中“非法利益”定义的立场。它揭示了对这一现象的基本特征的现有方法的差异。本文分析了赠与的概念和特征,以区分赠与与违法利益,并找出造成赠与的主要原因。强调了对违法收受贿赂行为进行明确规制的重要性,以避免对违法反腐败立法的错误分类。通过对“违法利益”与“赠与”的本质分析,可以发现赠与与违法利益主体的共同之处是既接受物质上确定的东西,又接受不具有货币等价物和物质反映的东西。区分礼物和非法利益的标志是“没有任何法律依据”的非法利益和“低于最低市场价格的无偿和接收/礼物”的标志。这是礼品构成定义的最后一部分,体现了礼品的价值特征。需要指出的是,考虑到赠与与非法利益之间的区别不明确,可能会导致对违反反腐败立法的错误分类。关键词:非法利益、赠与、反腐败立法、腐败犯罪、腐败相关犯罪、刑事责任、行政责任
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Illegal benefit in anti-corruption legislation: problems of legal regulation
The types and meaning of the main methods of preventing corruption are examined in the article. Administrative methods of combating corruption are identified among them. They are divided into two groups: rule-making (adoption of relevant law); law enforcement (application of law). The importance of proper legislative regulation in liquidating corruption is outlined. The formation of anti-corruption legislation, which has been going on for a long time, is revealed and it is noted that to date anti-corruption legislation has undergone a significant transformation and changed its purpose that is “prevention” instead of “struggle”. Emphasis is placed on innovations and reforms contained in the updated anti-corruption legislation. The provisions of statutary acts, which enshrine illegal benefit, are given. For carrying out a detailed analysis, the scholars’ positions on the current legislation on the definition of “illegal benefit” were analyzed. It revealed differences in existing approaches to the essential features of this phenomenon. The concept and features of a gift are analyzed in order to distinguish it from the illegal benefit and identify the main reasons for this. The importance of clear regulation of illegal benefit and gifts in order to avoid incorrect classification of violated anti-corruption legislation was emphasized. After analyzing the essence of “illegal benefit” and “gift”, it was found out that common to the subject of gift and illegal benefit was to receive both materially defined and things that do not have a monetary equivalent and material reflection. A sign that allows to distinguish a gift from an illegal benefit is the sign “without any legal grounds” for receiving an illegal benefit and “gratuitousness and receipt/gift at a price below the minimum market”. It is the last part of the component definition of a gift that testifies to the value characteristics of a gift. It is noted that taking into account the fact that since the difference between a gift and an illegal benefit is unclear, it may lead to incorrect classification of violated anti-corruption legislation. Key words: illegal benefit, gift, anti-corruption legislation, corruption offense, corruption-related offenses, criminal liability, administrative liability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信