CPEE:基于基本要件审判模式的民事案件判决预测

Lili Zhao, Linan Yue, Yanqing An, Yuren Zhang, Jun Yu, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen
{"title":"CPEE:基于基本要件审判模式的民事案件判决预测","authors":"Lili Zhao, Linan Yue, Yanqing An, Yuren Zhang, Jun Yu, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen","doi":"10.1145/3511808.3557273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Civil Case Judgment Prediction (CCJP) is a fundamental task in the legal intelligence of the civil law system, which aims to automatically predict the judgment results on each plea of the plaintiff. Existing studies mainly focus on making judgment predictions only on a certain civil cause (e.g., the divorce dispute) by utilizing the fact descriptions and pleas of the plaintiff, which still suffer from the various causes and complicated legal essential elements in the real court. Thus, in this paper, we formalize CCJP as a multi-task learning problem and propose a CCJP method centering on the trial mode of essential elements, CPEE, which explores the practical judicial process and analyzes comprehensive legal essential elements to make judgment predictions. Specifically, we first construct three tasks (i.e., the predictions on the civil causes, law articles, and the final judgment on each plea) necessary for CCJP, that follow the judgment process and exploit the results of intermediate subtasks to make judgment predictions. Then we design a logic-enhanced network to predict the results of three tasks and conduct a comprehensive study of civil cases. Finally, owing to the interlinked and dependent relationships among each task, we adopt the cause prediction result to help predict law articles and incorporate them into final judgment prediction through a gate mechanism. Furthermore, since the existing dataset fails to provide sufficient case information, we construct a real-world CCJP dataset that contains various causes and comprehensive legal elements. Extensive experimental results on the dataset validate the effectiveness of our method.","PeriodicalId":389624,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CPEE: Civil Case Judgment Prediction centering on the Trial Mode of Essential Elements\",\"authors\":\"Lili Zhao, Linan Yue, Yanqing An, Yuren Zhang, Jun Yu, Qi Liu, Enhong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3511808.3557273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Civil Case Judgment Prediction (CCJP) is a fundamental task in the legal intelligence of the civil law system, which aims to automatically predict the judgment results on each plea of the plaintiff. Existing studies mainly focus on making judgment predictions only on a certain civil cause (e.g., the divorce dispute) by utilizing the fact descriptions and pleas of the plaintiff, which still suffer from the various causes and complicated legal essential elements in the real court. Thus, in this paper, we formalize CCJP as a multi-task learning problem and propose a CCJP method centering on the trial mode of essential elements, CPEE, which explores the practical judicial process and analyzes comprehensive legal essential elements to make judgment predictions. Specifically, we first construct three tasks (i.e., the predictions on the civil causes, law articles, and the final judgment on each plea) necessary for CCJP, that follow the judgment process and exploit the results of intermediate subtasks to make judgment predictions. Then we design a logic-enhanced network to predict the results of three tasks and conduct a comprehensive study of civil cases. Finally, owing to the interlinked and dependent relationships among each task, we adopt the cause prediction result to help predict law articles and incorporate them into final judgment prediction through a gate mechanism. Furthermore, since the existing dataset fails to provide sufficient case information, we construct a real-world CCJP dataset that contains various causes and comprehensive legal elements. Extensive experimental results on the dataset validate the effectiveness of our method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":389624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3511808.3557273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3511808.3557273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

民事案件判决预测(CCJP)是民事法系法律情报中的一项基础性工作,其目的是对原告每一项抗辩的判决结果进行自动预测。现有的研究主要集中在仅对某一民事案件(如离婚纠纷)进行判决预测,利用原告的事实描述和诉状,仍然受到现实法庭中各种原因和复杂的法律要件的影响。因此,本文将CCJP形式化为一个多任务学习问题,并提出了一种以基本要素审判模式为中心的CCJP方法——CPEE,通过探索实际司法过程,综合分析法律基本要素,进行判决预测。具体而言,我们首先构建了CCJP所需的三个任务(即对民事原因的预测、法律条款的预测和对每个请求的最终判决),它们遵循判决过程,并利用中间子任务的结果进行判决预测。然后,我们设计了一个逻辑增强的网络来预测三个任务的结果,并对民事案件进行了全面的研究。最后,由于各任务之间的相互联系和依赖关系,我们采用原因预测结果来帮助预测法律条款,并通过门机制将其纳入最终的判决预测。此外,由于现有数据集无法提供足够的案例信息,我们构建了一个包含各种原因和综合法律要素的真实CCJP数据集。大量的数据集实验结果验证了该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CPEE: Civil Case Judgment Prediction centering on the Trial Mode of Essential Elements
Civil Case Judgment Prediction (CCJP) is a fundamental task in the legal intelligence of the civil law system, which aims to automatically predict the judgment results on each plea of the plaintiff. Existing studies mainly focus on making judgment predictions only on a certain civil cause (e.g., the divorce dispute) by utilizing the fact descriptions and pleas of the plaintiff, which still suffer from the various causes and complicated legal essential elements in the real court. Thus, in this paper, we formalize CCJP as a multi-task learning problem and propose a CCJP method centering on the trial mode of essential elements, CPEE, which explores the practical judicial process and analyzes comprehensive legal essential elements to make judgment predictions. Specifically, we first construct three tasks (i.e., the predictions on the civil causes, law articles, and the final judgment on each plea) necessary for CCJP, that follow the judgment process and exploit the results of intermediate subtasks to make judgment predictions. Then we design a logic-enhanced network to predict the results of three tasks and conduct a comprehensive study of civil cases. Finally, owing to the interlinked and dependent relationships among each task, we adopt the cause prediction result to help predict law articles and incorporate them into final judgment prediction through a gate mechanism. Furthermore, since the existing dataset fails to provide sufficient case information, we construct a real-world CCJP dataset that contains various causes and comprehensive legal elements. Extensive experimental results on the dataset validate the effectiveness of our method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信