两种不同浓度罗哌卡因与可乐定辅助应用于小儿尾侧硬膜外的比较。

K. Adate, S. Sardesai, S. Thombre, A. Shinde
{"title":"两种不同浓度罗哌卡因与可乐定辅助应用于小儿尾侧硬膜外的比较。","authors":"K. Adate, S. Sardesai, S. Thombre, A. Shinde","doi":"10.5580/bf0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aim of this double blind, randomized, comparative study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of two different concentrations of ropivacaine and fixed dose clonidine as an adjuvant for pediatric caudal block.Methods: Sixty ASA-I children undergoing elective ilio-inguinal surgery were randomly divided in two groups to receive, caudal injection with 0.1% ropivacaine 1ml/kg and clonidine 2μg/kg in group I or 0.2% ropivacaine 1ml/kg and clonidine 2μg/kg in group II after induction of standard general anesthesia. Intra and post-operatively HR, MAP and RR were monitored. Postoperative duration of analgesia, CHIPPS (Child and infant post-operative pain scale), sedation by Ramsay sedation scale and residual motor blockade by Modified Bromage scale were recorded.Result : There were no significant differences among the two study groups with respect to age, weight or duration of surgery. In both the groups none of patient required additional analgesia or anesthesia intra-operatively. Mean CHIPPS in group I was0.89±0.42 and in group II was 0.94±0.58, p-value 0.69 was statistically non significant .Duration of analgesia in both the groups was statistically not significant. Bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation were not recorded in both the study groups.Conclusion: It was concluded that, addition of clonidine to 0.1% ropivacaine gives similar quality and duration of analgesia as that of 0.2% ropivacaine and clonidine, without causing significant degree of postoperative sedation and motor weakness.","PeriodicalId":396781,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Of Two Different Concentration Of Ropivacaine With Clonidine As Adjuvant, In Caudal Epidural In Pediatric Patients.\",\"authors\":\"K. Adate, S. Sardesai, S. Thombre, A. Shinde\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/bf0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The aim of this double blind, randomized, comparative study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of two different concentrations of ropivacaine and fixed dose clonidine as an adjuvant for pediatric caudal block.Methods: Sixty ASA-I children undergoing elective ilio-inguinal surgery were randomly divided in two groups to receive, caudal injection with 0.1% ropivacaine 1ml/kg and clonidine 2μg/kg in group I or 0.2% ropivacaine 1ml/kg and clonidine 2μg/kg in group II after induction of standard general anesthesia. Intra and post-operatively HR, MAP and RR were monitored. Postoperative duration of analgesia, CHIPPS (Child and infant post-operative pain scale), sedation by Ramsay sedation scale and residual motor blockade by Modified Bromage scale were recorded.Result : There were no significant differences among the two study groups with respect to age, weight or duration of surgery. In both the groups none of patient required additional analgesia or anesthesia intra-operatively. Mean CHIPPS in group I was0.89±0.42 and in group II was 0.94±0.58, p-value 0.69 was statistically non significant .Duration of analgesia in both the groups was statistically not significant. Bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation were not recorded in both the study groups.Conclusion: It was concluded that, addition of clonidine to 0.1% ropivacaine gives similar quality and duration of analgesia as that of 0.2% ropivacaine and clonidine, without causing significant degree of postoperative sedation and motor weakness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":396781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/bf0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/bf0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

背景:这项双盲、随机、比较研究的目的是评估两种不同浓度的罗哌卡因和固定剂量的克拉定作为儿童尾侧阻滞的辅助剂的镇痛疗效和安全性。方法:择期行髂-腹股沟手术的ASA-I型患儿60例,随机分为两组,ⅰ组在标准全麻诱导后尾侧注射0.1%罗哌卡因1ml/kg加可乐定2μg/kg,ⅱ组在标准全麻诱导后尾侧注射0.2%罗哌卡因1ml/kg加可乐定2μg/kg。术中、术后监测HR、MAP、RR。记录术后镇痛时间、儿童及婴儿术后疼痛评分(CHIPPS)、Ramsay镇静评分法镇静效果及改良Bromage评分法残留运动阻断效果。结果:两组患者在年龄、体重、手术时间等方面无显著差异。两组患者均无需额外的术中镇痛或麻醉。ⅰ组平均镇痛时间为0.89±0.42,ⅱ组平均镇痛时间为0.94±0.58,p值0.69差异无统计学意义。两组镇痛时间差异无统计学意义。两个研究组均未记录心动过缓、低血压和镇静。结论:0.1%罗哌卡因加可乐定与0.2%罗哌卡因加可乐定的镇痛质量和持续时间相似,且未引起术后明显程度的镇静和运动无力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Of Two Different Concentration Of Ropivacaine With Clonidine As Adjuvant, In Caudal Epidural In Pediatric Patients.
Background: The aim of this double blind, randomized, comparative study was to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of two different concentrations of ropivacaine and fixed dose clonidine as an adjuvant for pediatric caudal block.Methods: Sixty ASA-I children undergoing elective ilio-inguinal surgery were randomly divided in two groups to receive, caudal injection with 0.1% ropivacaine 1ml/kg and clonidine 2μg/kg in group I or 0.2% ropivacaine 1ml/kg and clonidine 2μg/kg in group II after induction of standard general anesthesia. Intra and post-operatively HR, MAP and RR were monitored. Postoperative duration of analgesia, CHIPPS (Child and infant post-operative pain scale), sedation by Ramsay sedation scale and residual motor blockade by Modified Bromage scale were recorded.Result : There were no significant differences among the two study groups with respect to age, weight or duration of surgery. In both the groups none of patient required additional analgesia or anesthesia intra-operatively. Mean CHIPPS in group I was0.89±0.42 and in group II was 0.94±0.58, p-value 0.69 was statistically non significant .Duration of analgesia in both the groups was statistically not significant. Bradycardia, hypotension, and sedation were not recorded in both the study groups.Conclusion: It was concluded that, addition of clonidine to 0.1% ropivacaine gives similar quality and duration of analgesia as that of 0.2% ropivacaine and clonidine, without causing significant degree of postoperative sedation and motor weakness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信