持续性挑战和观点的社会学

A. Henkel, S. Böschen, N. Drews, Louisa A. Firnenburg, B. Görgen, Matthias Grundmann, Nico Lüdtke, Thomas Pfister, Simon Rödder, Björn Wendt
{"title":"持续性挑战和观点的社会学","authors":"A. Henkel, S. Böschen, N. Drews, Louisa A. Firnenburg, B. Görgen, Matthias Grundmann, Nico Lüdtke, Thomas Pfister, Simon Rödder, Björn Wendt","doi":"10.1515/9783839451991-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proceeds on the assumption that a specifically sociological perspective is lacking in the discourse on sustainability. However, especially in view of the diversity of this dis-course, a “sociology of sustainability” may offer new insights by contributing different per-spectives and critically reflecting on the implicit premises of the sustainability debate. A spe-cific challenge for sociology is to position itself with regard to the problem-orientation as well as the normative character of sustainability. This contribution proposes to consider the per-spective-rich diversity of sociology as a strength, which, as it applies to the parallel diversity of sustainability, can be made very productive. Sociological approaches applicable to the sus-tainability debate are those that bear upon the simultaneity of observation and orientation of transformation – whether with an area-specific or societal-theoretical focus – and arrive at thoroughly plural mediation proposals. This paper introduces five such proposals as explora-tory examples for a sociology of sustainability: doing sustainability, a field theoretical analy-sis, a contribution from the sociology of science, epistemic governance and a societal-theoretical reflection. We understand this as a prelude to a discussion regarding the coming sociology of sustainability.","PeriodicalId":277833,"journal":{"name":"Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit – Herausforderungen und Perspektiven\",\"authors\":\"A. Henkel, S. Böschen, N. Drews, Louisa A. Firnenburg, B. Görgen, Matthias Grundmann, Nico Lüdtke, Thomas Pfister, Simon Rödder, Björn Wendt\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783839451991-003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proceeds on the assumption that a specifically sociological perspective is lacking in the discourse on sustainability. However, especially in view of the diversity of this dis-course, a “sociology of sustainability” may offer new insights by contributing different per-spectives and critically reflecting on the implicit premises of the sustainability debate. A spe-cific challenge for sociology is to position itself with regard to the problem-orientation as well as the normative character of sustainability. This contribution proposes to consider the per-spective-rich diversity of sociology as a strength, which, as it applies to the parallel diversity of sustainability, can be made very productive. Sociological approaches applicable to the sus-tainability debate are those that bear upon the simultaneity of observation and orientation of transformation – whether with an area-specific or societal-theoretical focus – and arrive at thoroughly plural mediation proposals. This paper introduces five such proposals as explora-tory examples for a sociology of sustainability: doing sustainability, a field theoretical analy-sis, a contribution from the sociology of science, epistemic governance and a societal-theoretical reflection. We understand this as a prelude to a discussion regarding the coming sociology of sustainability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":277833,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839451991-003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783839451991-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文的假设是,在可持续性的论述中缺乏一个具体的社会学视角。然而,特别是考虑到这种话语的多样性,“可持续性社会学”可以通过提供不同的观点和批判性地反思可持续性辩论的隐含前提来提供新的见解。社会学面临的一个具体挑战是根据问题导向以及可持续性的规范性特征来定位自己。这一贡献建议将社会学的视角丰富的多样性视为一种优势,因为它适用于可持续性的平行多样性,可以使其非常富有成效。适用于可持续性辩论的社会学方法是那些与观察和转型方向的同时有关的方法-无论是特定领域还是社会理论焦点-并得出彻底多元的调解建议。本文介绍了可持续性社会学的五个探索实例:实践可持续性、实地理论分析、科学社会学的贡献、认知治理和社会理论反思。我们认为这是关于即将到来的可持续性社会学讨论的前奏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soziologie der Nachhaltigkeit – Herausforderungen und Perspektiven
This paper proceeds on the assumption that a specifically sociological perspective is lacking in the discourse on sustainability. However, especially in view of the diversity of this dis-course, a “sociology of sustainability” may offer new insights by contributing different per-spectives and critically reflecting on the implicit premises of the sustainability debate. A spe-cific challenge for sociology is to position itself with regard to the problem-orientation as well as the normative character of sustainability. This contribution proposes to consider the per-spective-rich diversity of sociology as a strength, which, as it applies to the parallel diversity of sustainability, can be made very productive. Sociological approaches applicable to the sus-tainability debate are those that bear upon the simultaneity of observation and orientation of transformation – whether with an area-specific or societal-theoretical focus – and arrive at thoroughly plural mediation proposals. This paper introduces five such proposals as explora-tory examples for a sociology of sustainability: doing sustainability, a field theoretical analy-sis, a contribution from the sociology of science, epistemic governance and a societal-theoretical reflection. We understand this as a prelude to a discussion regarding the coming sociology of sustainability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信