形状建模和基于图谱的pQCT下肢组织识别分割

S. Makrogiannis, A. Okorie, T. Biswas, L. Ferrucci
{"title":"形状建模和基于图谱的pQCT下肢组织识别分割","authors":"S. Makrogiannis, A. Okorie, T. Biswas, L. Ferrucci","doi":"10.1109/SPMB47826.2019.9037862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work, we introduce an atlas-based segmentation method for lower leg tissues at 4%, 38%, and 66% tibial length. Our goal is to model the shape of the lower leg tissue types and to identify hard and soft tissues in an automated way. In our methodology, we implemented B-spline based free form deformation (FFD), and symmetric diffeomorphic demons (SDD) deformable models for nonlinear registration, and compared their performances for atlas-based segmentation accuracy on our pQCT data. Overall, we concluded that atlas-based segmentation is a promising technique, especially in the presence of noise and other types of image degradation. We also observed that the diffeomorphic demons algorithm may produce more accurate deformation fields than FFD. On the other hand, FFD produced smoother deformations than SDD. Quantitative analysis using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), showed that FFD was slightly better than SDD in identification of the trabecular bone tissue in 4% tibia. At 38% tibial length, SDD produced consistently higher DSC values than FFD, while at 66% tibia, FFD produced slightly higher segmentation accuracy.","PeriodicalId":143197,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shape Modeling and Atlas-Based Segmentation for Identification of Lower Leg Tissues in pQCT\",\"authors\":\"S. Makrogiannis, A. Okorie, T. Biswas, L. Ferrucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SPMB47826.2019.9037862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this work, we introduce an atlas-based segmentation method for lower leg tissues at 4%, 38%, and 66% tibial length. Our goal is to model the shape of the lower leg tissue types and to identify hard and soft tissues in an automated way. In our methodology, we implemented B-spline based free form deformation (FFD), and symmetric diffeomorphic demons (SDD) deformable models for nonlinear registration, and compared their performances for atlas-based segmentation accuracy on our pQCT data. Overall, we concluded that atlas-based segmentation is a promising technique, especially in the presence of noise and other types of image degradation. We also observed that the diffeomorphic demons algorithm may produce more accurate deformation fields than FFD. On the other hand, FFD produced smoother deformations than SDD. Quantitative analysis using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), showed that FFD was slightly better than SDD in identification of the trabecular bone tissue in 4% tibia. At 38% tibial length, SDD produced consistently higher DSC values than FFD, while at 66% tibia, FFD produced slightly higher segmentation accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":143197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPMB47826.2019.9037862\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium (SPMB)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SPMB47826.2019.9037862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项工作中,我们介绍了一种基于地图集的小腿组织分割方法,分别为胫骨长度的4%、38%和66%。我们的目标是模拟小腿组织类型的形状,并以自动化的方式识别硬组织和软组织。在我们的方法中,我们实现了基于b样条的自由形式变形(FFD)和对称差分形(SDD)变形模型用于非线性配准,并比较了它们在基于图集的pQCT数据分割精度方面的性能。总的来说,我们得出结论,基于图谱的分割是一种很有前途的技术,特别是在存在噪声和其他类型的图像退化的情况下。我们还观察到,与FFD相比,微分同构算法可以产生更精确的变形场。另一方面,FFD比SDD产生更平滑的变形。采用Dice相似系数(DSC)进行定量分析,结果显示FFD对4%胫骨骨小梁组织的识别略优于SDD。在胫骨长度为38%时,SDD产生的DSC值始终高于FFD,而在胫骨长度为66%时,FFD产生的分割精度略高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Shape Modeling and Atlas-Based Segmentation for Identification of Lower Leg Tissues in pQCT
In this work, we introduce an atlas-based segmentation method for lower leg tissues at 4%, 38%, and 66% tibial length. Our goal is to model the shape of the lower leg tissue types and to identify hard and soft tissues in an automated way. In our methodology, we implemented B-spline based free form deformation (FFD), and symmetric diffeomorphic demons (SDD) deformable models for nonlinear registration, and compared their performances for atlas-based segmentation accuracy on our pQCT data. Overall, we concluded that atlas-based segmentation is a promising technique, especially in the presence of noise and other types of image degradation. We also observed that the diffeomorphic demons algorithm may produce more accurate deformation fields than FFD. On the other hand, FFD produced smoother deformations than SDD. Quantitative analysis using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), showed that FFD was slightly better than SDD in identification of the trabecular bone tissue in 4% tibia. At 38% tibial length, SDD produced consistently higher DSC values than FFD, while at 66% tibia, FFD produced slightly higher segmentation accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信