“一个n !公式大小的下界

M. Adler, N. Immerman
{"title":"“一个n !公式大小的下界","authors":"M. Adler, N. Immerman","doi":"10.1109/LICS.2001.932497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a new Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game for proving lower bounds on the size of first-order formulas. Up until now such games have only been used to prove bounds on the operator depth of formulas, not their size. We use this game to prove that the CTL/sup +/ formula Occur/sub n//spl equiv/E[Fp/sub 1//spl and/Fp/sub 2//spl and//spl middot//spl middot//spl middot//spl and/F/sub n/] which says that there is a path along which the predicates p/sub 1/ through p/sub n/ occur in some order; requires size n! to express in CTL. Our lower bound is optimal. It follows that the succinctness of CTL+ with respect to CTL is exactly /spl Theta/(n). Wilke (1999) had shown that the succinctness was at least exponential. We also use our games to prove all optimal /spl Theta/(n) lower bound on the number of boolean variables needed for a weak reachability logic (/spl Rscr//spl Lscr//sup w/) to polynomially embed the language LTL. The number of booleans needed for full reachability logic RC and the transitive closure logic FO/sup 2/(TC) remain open (Immerman and Vardi, 1997; Alechina and Immerman, 2000).","PeriodicalId":366313,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 16th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"65","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"An n! lower bound on formula size\\\"\",\"authors\":\"M. Adler, N. Immerman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LICS.2001.932497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce a new Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game for proving lower bounds on the size of first-order formulas. Up until now such games have only been used to prove bounds on the operator depth of formulas, not their size. We use this game to prove that the CTL/sup +/ formula Occur/sub n//spl equiv/E[Fp/sub 1//spl and/Fp/sub 2//spl and//spl middot//spl middot//spl middot//spl and/F/sub n/] which says that there is a path along which the predicates p/sub 1/ through p/sub n/ occur in some order; requires size n! to express in CTL. Our lower bound is optimal. It follows that the succinctness of CTL+ with respect to CTL is exactly /spl Theta/(n). Wilke (1999) had shown that the succinctness was at least exponential. We also use our games to prove all optimal /spl Theta/(n) lower bound on the number of boolean variables needed for a weak reachability logic (/spl Rscr//spl Lscr//sup w/) to polynomially embed the language LTL. The number of booleans needed for full reachability logic RC and the transitive closure logic FO/sup 2/(TC) remain open (Immerman and Vardi, 1997; Alechina and Immerman, 2000).\",\"PeriodicalId\":366313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings 16th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"65\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings 16th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2001.932497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 16th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2001.932497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 65

摘要

我们引入了一种新的Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse博弈来证明一阶公式大小的下界。到目前为止,这样的游戏只被用来证明公式的算子深度的边界,而不是它们的大小。我们用这个博弈证明了CTL/sup +/公式Occur/sub n//spl equiv/E[Fp/sub 1//spl和/Fp/sub 2//spl和//spl middot//spl middot//spl middot//spl middot//spl和/F/sub n/],它表明存在一条路径,谓词p/sub 1/到p/sub n/按某种顺序出现;需要大小为n!以CTL表达。下界是最优的。由此可见,CTL+相对于CTL的简洁性正好是/spl Theta/(n)。Wilke(1999)已经表明,简洁性至少是指数级的。我们还使用我们的游戏来证明弱可达性逻辑(/spl Rscr//spl Lscr//sup w/)多项式嵌入语言LTL所需的布尔变量数量的所有最优/spl Theta/(n)下界。完全可达逻辑RC和传递闭包逻辑FO/sup 2/(TC)所需的布尔数保持开放(Immerman and Vardi, 1997;Alechina and Immerman, 2000)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"An n! lower bound on formula size"
We introduce a new Ehrenfeucht-Fraisse game for proving lower bounds on the size of first-order formulas. Up until now such games have only been used to prove bounds on the operator depth of formulas, not their size. We use this game to prove that the CTL/sup +/ formula Occur/sub n//spl equiv/E[Fp/sub 1//spl and/Fp/sub 2//spl and//spl middot//spl middot//spl middot//spl and/F/sub n/] which says that there is a path along which the predicates p/sub 1/ through p/sub n/ occur in some order; requires size n! to express in CTL. Our lower bound is optimal. It follows that the succinctness of CTL+ with respect to CTL is exactly /spl Theta/(n). Wilke (1999) had shown that the succinctness was at least exponential. We also use our games to prove all optimal /spl Theta/(n) lower bound on the number of boolean variables needed for a weak reachability logic (/spl Rscr//spl Lscr//sup w/) to polynomially embed the language LTL. The number of booleans needed for full reachability logic RC and the transitive closure logic FO/sup 2/(TC) remain open (Immerman and Vardi, 1997; Alechina and Immerman, 2000).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信