Raphael Kreft, Clemens Büchner, Silvan Sievers, M. Helmert
{"title":"基于反例引导的最优经典规划的计算域抽象","authors":"Raphael Kreft, Clemens Büchner, Silvan Sievers, M. Helmert","doi":"10.1609/icaps.v33i1.27198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstraction heuristics are the state of the art in optimal classical\nplanning as heuristic search. A popular method for computing\nabstractions is the counterexample-guided abstraction refinement\n(CEGAR) principle, which has successfully been used for projections,\nwhich are the abstractions underlying pattern databases, and\nCartesian abstractions. While projections are simple and fast to\ncompute, Cartesian abstractions subsume projections and hence allow\nmore fine-grained abstractions, however at the expense of efficiency.\nDomain abstractions are a third class of abstractions between\nprojections and Cartesian abstractions in terms of generality. Yet,\nto the best of our knowledge, they are only briefly considered in the\nplanning literature but have not been used for computing heuristics\nyet. We aim to close this gap and compute domain abstractions by using\nthe CEGAR principle. Our empirical results show that domain\nabstractions compare favorably against projections and Cartesian\nabstractions.","PeriodicalId":239898,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Computing Domain Abstractions for Optimal Classical Planning with Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement\",\"authors\":\"Raphael Kreft, Clemens Büchner, Silvan Sievers, M. Helmert\",\"doi\":\"10.1609/icaps.v33i1.27198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstraction heuristics are the state of the art in optimal classical\\nplanning as heuristic search. A popular method for computing\\nabstractions is the counterexample-guided abstraction refinement\\n(CEGAR) principle, which has successfully been used for projections,\\nwhich are the abstractions underlying pattern databases, and\\nCartesian abstractions. While projections are simple and fast to\\ncompute, Cartesian abstractions subsume projections and hence allow\\nmore fine-grained abstractions, however at the expense of efficiency.\\nDomain abstractions are a third class of abstractions between\\nprojections and Cartesian abstractions in terms of generality. Yet,\\nto the best of our knowledge, they are only briefly considered in the\\nplanning literature but have not been used for computing heuristics\\nyet. We aim to close this gap and compute domain abstractions by using\\nthe CEGAR principle. Our empirical results show that domain\\nabstractions compare favorably against projections and Cartesian\\nabstractions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v33i1.27198\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/icaps.v33i1.27198","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Computing Domain Abstractions for Optimal Classical Planning with Counterexample-Guided Abstraction Refinement
Abstraction heuristics are the state of the art in optimal classical
planning as heuristic search. A popular method for computing
abstractions is the counterexample-guided abstraction refinement
(CEGAR) principle, which has successfully been used for projections,
which are the abstractions underlying pattern databases, and
Cartesian abstractions. While projections are simple and fast to
compute, Cartesian abstractions subsume projections and hence allow
more fine-grained abstractions, however at the expense of efficiency.
Domain abstractions are a third class of abstractions between
projections and Cartesian abstractions in terms of generality. Yet,
to the best of our knowledge, they are only briefly considered in the
planning literature but have not been used for computing heuristics
yet. We aim to close this gap and compute domain abstractions by using
the CEGAR principle. Our empirical results show that domain
abstractions compare favorably against projections and Cartesian
abstractions.