跨境电子服务和国际合作的需要:挪威的经验

Ole Gjems-Onstad
{"title":"跨境电子服务和国际合作的需要:挪威的经验","authors":"Ole Gjems-Onstad","doi":"10.5235/20488432.2.3.243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One does not need a crystal ball to foresee that efficient ways of collecting VAT on cross-border digital supplies are vital to the future of VAT. In 2011, Norway implemented new rules which make cross-border supplies of electronic services to private individuals in Norway liable to VAT. But the resources allocated for handling and developing this new area of VAT seem highly inadequate—perhaps not unlike the situation in many other jurisdictions. Nevertheless, given the fact that the Norwegian rules are modelled after the OECD recommendation that services that are ‘capable of delivery from a remote location’ should be taxed at destination, the Norwegian experience is of interest beyond that country’s borders. Furthermore, in an article in WJOVL volume 1 issue 1 (2013), Marie Lamensch voiced many critical observations attending the reverse charging (B2B) and single registration scheme (B2C) applied by the EU VAT Directive. Her ambitious proposals may, however, overshadow the fact that a more compromise-oriented and practically minded cooperative attitude on the part of national VAT authorities may represent a considerable step forward in this very tentative and pioneering phase of collecting VAT on cross-border supplies of electronic services. It is possible to approach the area of cross-border electronic services as a new and exciting area of possible tax revenue—for governments of both developed and developing countries. The glass is not half empty, it is half full.","PeriodicalId":114680,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cross-border electronic services and the need for international cooperation: the Norwegian experience\",\"authors\":\"Ole Gjems-Onstad\",\"doi\":\"10.5235/20488432.2.3.243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One does not need a crystal ball to foresee that efficient ways of collecting VAT on cross-border digital supplies are vital to the future of VAT. In 2011, Norway implemented new rules which make cross-border supplies of electronic services to private individuals in Norway liable to VAT. But the resources allocated for handling and developing this new area of VAT seem highly inadequate—perhaps not unlike the situation in many other jurisdictions. Nevertheless, given the fact that the Norwegian rules are modelled after the OECD recommendation that services that are ‘capable of delivery from a remote location’ should be taxed at destination, the Norwegian experience is of interest beyond that country’s borders. Furthermore, in an article in WJOVL volume 1 issue 1 (2013), Marie Lamensch voiced many critical observations attending the reverse charging (B2B) and single registration scheme (B2C) applied by the EU VAT Directive. Her ambitious proposals may, however, overshadow the fact that a more compromise-oriented and practically minded cooperative attitude on the part of national VAT authorities may represent a considerable step forward in this very tentative and pioneering phase of collecting VAT on cross-border supplies of electronic services. It is possible to approach the area of cross-border electronic services as a new and exciting area of possible tax revenue—for governments of both developed and developing countries. The glass is not half empty, it is half full.\",\"PeriodicalId\":114680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"volume\":\"129 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of VAT/GST Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.2.3.243\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of VAT/GST Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5235/20488432.2.3.243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们不需要水晶球就能预见,对跨境数字商品征收增值税的有效方式对增值税的未来至关重要。2011年,挪威实施了新规则,规定向挪威个人提供跨境电子服务需缴纳增值税。但是,用于处理和发展这一新的增值税领域的资源似乎非常不足——也许与许多其他司法管辖区的情况没有什么不同。然而,鉴于挪威的规则是根据经合组织的建议,即“能够从远程地点提供”的服务应在目的地征税,挪威的经验对该国以外的国家感兴趣。此外,在WJOVL第1卷第1期(2013)的一篇文章中,Marie Lamensch对欧盟增值税指令应用的反向收费(B2B)和单一注册计划(B2C)提出了许多重要的观察。然而,她雄心勃勃的提议可能掩盖了这样一个事实,即国家增值税当局采取更加妥协和务实的合作态度,可能代表着在这个非常试试性和开拓性的阶段向前迈出了相当大的一步,即对跨境电子服务供应征收增值税。对于发达国家和发展中国家的政府来说,跨境电子服务领域有可能成为一个新的、令人兴奋的潜在税收领域。杯子不是半空的,而是半满的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cross-border electronic services and the need for international cooperation: the Norwegian experience
One does not need a crystal ball to foresee that efficient ways of collecting VAT on cross-border digital supplies are vital to the future of VAT. In 2011, Norway implemented new rules which make cross-border supplies of electronic services to private individuals in Norway liable to VAT. But the resources allocated for handling and developing this new area of VAT seem highly inadequate—perhaps not unlike the situation in many other jurisdictions. Nevertheless, given the fact that the Norwegian rules are modelled after the OECD recommendation that services that are ‘capable of delivery from a remote location’ should be taxed at destination, the Norwegian experience is of interest beyond that country’s borders. Furthermore, in an article in WJOVL volume 1 issue 1 (2013), Marie Lamensch voiced many critical observations attending the reverse charging (B2B) and single registration scheme (B2C) applied by the EU VAT Directive. Her ambitious proposals may, however, overshadow the fact that a more compromise-oriented and practically minded cooperative attitude on the part of national VAT authorities may represent a considerable step forward in this very tentative and pioneering phase of collecting VAT on cross-border supplies of electronic services. It is possible to approach the area of cross-border electronic services as a new and exciting area of possible tax revenue—for governments of both developed and developing countries. The glass is not half empty, it is half full.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信