PARSEC与SPLASH-2:在chip - multiprocessor上对两个多线程基准套件进行定量比较

Christian Bienia, Sanjeev Kumar, Kai Li
{"title":"PARSEC与SPLASH-2:在chip - multiprocessor上对两个多线程基准套件进行定量比较","authors":"Christian Bienia, Sanjeev Kumar, Kai Li","doi":"10.1109/IISWC.2008.4636090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The PARSEC benchmark suite was recently released and has been adopted by a significant number of users within a short amount of time. This new collection of workloads is not yet fully understood by researchers. In this study we compare the SPLASH-2 and PARSEC benchmark suites with each other to gain insights into differences and similarities between the two program collections. We use standard statistical methods and machine learning to analyze the suites for redundancy and overlap on chip-multiprocessors (CMPs). Our analysis shows that PARSEC workloads are fundamentally different from SPLASH-2 benchmarks. The observed differences can be explained with two technology trends, the proliferation of CMPs and the accelerating growth of world data.","PeriodicalId":447179,"journal":{"name":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"238","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PARSEC vs. SPLASH-2: A quantitative comparison of two multithreaded benchmark suites on Chip-Multiprocessors\",\"authors\":\"Christian Bienia, Sanjeev Kumar, Kai Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IISWC.2008.4636090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The PARSEC benchmark suite was recently released and has been adopted by a significant number of users within a short amount of time. This new collection of workloads is not yet fully understood by researchers. In this study we compare the SPLASH-2 and PARSEC benchmark suites with each other to gain insights into differences and similarities between the two program collections. We use standard statistical methods and machine learning to analyze the suites for redundancy and overlap on chip-multiprocessors (CMPs). Our analysis shows that PARSEC workloads are fundamentally different from SPLASH-2 benchmarks. The observed differences can be explained with two technology trends, the proliferation of CMPs and the accelerating growth of world data.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"238\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISWC.2008.4636090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISWC.2008.4636090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 238

摘要

PARSEC基准测试套件是最近发布的,并在很短的时间内被大量用户采用。研究人员还没有完全理解这种新的工作量集合。在本研究中,我们比较了SPLASH-2和PARSEC基准套件,以深入了解这两个程序集合之间的异同。我们使用标准的统计方法和机器学习来分析芯片多处理器(cmp)上的冗余和重叠套件。我们的分析表明,PARSEC工作负载与SPLASH-2基准有根本的不同。观察到的差异可以用两种技术趋势来解释,即cmp的激增和世界数据的加速增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PARSEC vs. SPLASH-2: A quantitative comparison of two multithreaded benchmark suites on Chip-Multiprocessors
The PARSEC benchmark suite was recently released and has been adopted by a significant number of users within a short amount of time. This new collection of workloads is not yet fully understood by researchers. In this study we compare the SPLASH-2 and PARSEC benchmark suites with each other to gain insights into differences and similarities between the two program collections. We use standard statistical methods and machine learning to analyze the suites for redundancy and overlap on chip-multiprocessors (CMPs). Our analysis shows that PARSEC workloads are fundamentally different from SPLASH-2 benchmarks. The observed differences can be explained with two technology trends, the proliferation of CMPs and the accelerating growth of world data.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信