投票顺序对公民投票选举的影响

J. Matsusaka
{"title":"投票顺序对公民投票选举的影响","authors":"J. Matsusaka","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2394462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many political practitioners believe that voters are more likely to approve propositions listed at the top than the bottom of the ballot, and this belief influences election laws across the country. A large body of research has shown that ballot structure matters for candidate elections, potentially distorting democratic decisions, but there is little evidence for ballot propositions. This paper offers two different strategies for identifying the causal effect of ballot order in proposition elections, and applies the methods to data from California during 1958-2014 and Texas during 1986-2013. The main finding is the absence of evidence that being listed at the top compared to the bottom of the ballot has any effect on approval. Approval rates are lower when there are more propositions on the ballot.","PeriodicalId":191430,"journal":{"name":"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Political Science Research Paper Series","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ballot Order Effects in Referendum Elections\",\"authors\":\"J. Matsusaka\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2394462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many political practitioners believe that voters are more likely to approve propositions listed at the top than the bottom of the ballot, and this belief influences election laws across the country. A large body of research has shown that ballot structure matters for candidate elections, potentially distorting democratic decisions, but there is little evidence for ballot propositions. This paper offers two different strategies for identifying the causal effect of ballot order in proposition elections, and applies the methods to data from California during 1958-2014 and Texas during 1986-2013. The main finding is the absence of evidence that being listed at the top compared to the bottom of the ballot has any effect on approval. Approval rates are lower when there are more propositions on the ballot.\",\"PeriodicalId\":191430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Political Science Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Political Science Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2394462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Southern California Center for Law & Social Science (CLASS) Political Science Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2394462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

许多政治从业者认为,选民更有可能批准列在选票顶部的提案,而不是列在选票底部的提案,这种信念影响了全国各地的选举法。大量研究表明,选票结构对候选人选举很重要,可能会扭曲民主决定,但几乎没有证据表明选票主张。本文提出了两种不同的策略来识别提案选举中选票顺序的因果效应,并将这些方法应用于1958-2014年加利福尼亚州和1986-2013年德克萨斯州的数据。研究的主要发现是,没有证据表明,与选票的末尾相比,名列前茅对批准有任何影响。选票上的提案越多,支持率就越低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ballot Order Effects in Referendum Elections
Many political practitioners believe that voters are more likely to approve propositions listed at the top than the bottom of the ballot, and this belief influences election laws across the country. A large body of research has shown that ballot structure matters for candidate elections, potentially distorting democratic decisions, but there is little evidence for ballot propositions. This paper offers two different strategies for identifying the causal effect of ballot order in proposition elections, and applies the methods to data from California during 1958-2014 and Texas during 1986-2013. The main finding is the absence of evidence that being listed at the top compared to the bottom of the ballot has any effect on approval. Approval rates are lower when there are more propositions on the ballot.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信