职业和惯用手:对建筑师和邮件调查偏见的考察。

C J Wood, J P Aggleton
{"title":"职业和惯用手:对建筑师和邮件调查偏见的考察。","authors":"C J Wood,&nbsp;J P Aggleton","doi":"10.1037/h0084292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Handedness among architects was determined by mail survey. Contrary to previous reports, no evidence was found of an excess of left-handers among a sample of 236 fully qualified male architects and 78 male architectural students. A second study examined whether the use of mail surveys systematically biases the returns of handedness questionnaires. For this, questionnaires were sent to 1,017 university students. No evidence was found for a bias amongst those who did and did not reply to the initial questionnaire. These results strengthen the findings of the first study.</p>","PeriodicalId":75671,"journal":{"name":"Canadian journal of psychology","volume":"45 3","pages":"395-404"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/h0084292","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupation and handedness: an examination of architects and mail survey biases.\",\"authors\":\"C J Wood,&nbsp;J P Aggleton\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/h0084292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Handedness among architects was determined by mail survey. Contrary to previous reports, no evidence was found of an excess of left-handers among a sample of 236 fully qualified male architects and 78 male architectural students. A second study examined whether the use of mail surveys systematically biases the returns of handedness questionnaires. For this, questionnaires were sent to 1,017 university students. No evidence was found for a bias amongst those who did and did not reply to the initial questionnaire. These results strengthen the findings of the first study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian journal of psychology\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"395-404\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1991-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1037/h0084292\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian journal of psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084292\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084292","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

建筑师的惯用手是通过邮件调查确定的。与之前的报告相反,在236名完全合格的男性建筑师和78名男性建筑专业学生的样本中,没有发现左撇子过多的证据。第二项研究考察了邮件调查是否会系统性地影响惯用手问卷的结果。为此,研究人员向1017名大学生发放了调查问卷。没有证据表明在回答和没有回答最初问卷的人之间存在偏见。这些结果加强了第一项研究的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupation and handedness: an examination of architects and mail survey biases.

Handedness among architects was determined by mail survey. Contrary to previous reports, no evidence was found of an excess of left-handers among a sample of 236 fully qualified male architects and 78 male architectural students. A second study examined whether the use of mail surveys systematically biases the returns of handedness questionnaires. For this, questionnaires were sent to 1,017 university students. No evidence was found for a bias amongst those who did and did not reply to the initial questionnaire. These results strengthen the findings of the first study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信