商标功能与商标权

M. Peguera
{"title":"商标功能与商标权","authors":"M. Peguera","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3693270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last years, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has remarkably expanded the potential scope of trademark rights. Under the EU Trademark Directive, a trademark owner may only prevent third-party uses of the mark if such uses are made (i) in the course of trade, (ii) in relation to goods or services, and (iii) for the purpose of distinguishing the goods or services, that is, as a trade mark. The latter requirement had been traditionally understood by the CJEU as referring to the function to guarantee to consumers the identity of the origin of the goods or services (function of origin). Nonetheless, the CJEU case law has evolved to accept a very broad view of the use as a mark requirement so as to include referential, comparative and decorative uses when such uses may somehow affect the origin function. In yet a further step, the CJEU has come to understand that a use as a mark exists not only where the mark is used in connection to the function of origin, but also when it is used in relation to any other trademark function. Thus, in some cases, a trademark owner is entitled to prevent a third-party use even where such use is not capable of affecting the origin function, if it is liable to affect others functions of the mark, such as those of quality, communication, investment or advertising. This working paper provides an analysis of this evolution in the CJEU case law. In a further, more elaborated, version of the paper I intend enrich the analysis by comparing that European trend with US case law examples of broadening the scope of trademark rights.","PeriodicalId":125544,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trademark Functions and Trademark Rights\",\"authors\":\"M. Peguera\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3693270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the last years, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has remarkably expanded the potential scope of trademark rights. Under the EU Trademark Directive, a trademark owner may only prevent third-party uses of the mark if such uses are made (i) in the course of trade, (ii) in relation to goods or services, and (iii) for the purpose of distinguishing the goods or services, that is, as a trade mark. The latter requirement had been traditionally understood by the CJEU as referring to the function to guarantee to consumers the identity of the origin of the goods or services (function of origin). Nonetheless, the CJEU case law has evolved to accept a very broad view of the use as a mark requirement so as to include referential, comparative and decorative uses when such uses may somehow affect the origin function. In yet a further step, the CJEU has come to understand that a use as a mark exists not only where the mark is used in connection to the function of origin, but also when it is used in relation to any other trademark function. Thus, in some cases, a trademark owner is entitled to prevent a third-party use even where such use is not capable of affecting the origin function, if it is liable to affect others functions of the mark, such as those of quality, communication, investment or advertising. This working paper provides an analysis of this evolution in the CJEU case law. In a further, more elaborated, version of the paper I intend enrich the analysis by comparing that European trend with US case law examples of broadening the scope of trademark rights.\",\"PeriodicalId\":125544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3693270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3693270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在过去的几年中,欧盟法院(CJEU)显著地扩大了商标权的潜在范围。根据欧盟商标指令,商标所有人只有在以下情况下才能阻止第三方使用该商标:(i)在贸易过程中使用,(ii)与商品或服务有关,以及(iii)为了区分商品或服务,即作为商标使用。欧洲法院传统上对后一项要求的理解是指向消费者保证商品或服务的原产地身份的功能(原产地功能)。尽管如此,欧洲法院的判例法已经发展到接受作为商标要求的用途的非常广泛的观点,以便在这些用途可能以某种方式影响原产地功能时包括参考、比较和装饰用途。在进一步的步骤中,欧洲法院认识到,作为商标的使用不仅存在于与原产地功能有关的商标,而且存在于与任何其他商标功能有关的商标。因此,在某些情况下,如果第三方使用可能影响商标的其他功能,如质量、传播、投资或广告功能,商标所有人有权阻止第三方使用,即使这种使用不会影响原产地功能。本工作文件对欧洲法院判例法中的这一演变进行了分析。在进一步的、更详细的论文版本中,我打算通过比较欧洲趋势和美国扩大商标权范围的判例法例子来丰富分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trademark Functions and Trademark Rights
Over the last years, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has remarkably expanded the potential scope of trademark rights. Under the EU Trademark Directive, a trademark owner may only prevent third-party uses of the mark if such uses are made (i) in the course of trade, (ii) in relation to goods or services, and (iii) for the purpose of distinguishing the goods or services, that is, as a trade mark. The latter requirement had been traditionally understood by the CJEU as referring to the function to guarantee to consumers the identity of the origin of the goods or services (function of origin). Nonetheless, the CJEU case law has evolved to accept a very broad view of the use as a mark requirement so as to include referential, comparative and decorative uses when such uses may somehow affect the origin function. In yet a further step, the CJEU has come to understand that a use as a mark exists not only where the mark is used in connection to the function of origin, but also when it is used in relation to any other trademark function. Thus, in some cases, a trademark owner is entitled to prevent a third-party use even where such use is not capable of affecting the origin function, if it is liable to affect others functions of the mark, such as those of quality, communication, investment or advertising. This working paper provides an analysis of this evolution in the CJEU case law. In a further, more elaborated, version of the paper I intend enrich the analysis by comparing that European trend with US case law examples of broadening the scope of trademark rights.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信