形式,意义和他者在Charaudeau和volchinov中关于这个词地位的注释

Eduardo da Silva Moll
{"title":"形式,意义和他者在Charaudeau和volchinov中关于这个词地位的注释","authors":"Eduardo da Silva Moll","doi":"10.29327/210932.9.1-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The word attached to alterity and to the (co)production of meaning seems to be the touchstone of either Bakhtin and his Circle’s sociological method, and Patrick Charaudeau’s semiolinguistic approach. This paper’s objective is to discuss the relationship between alterity, form and meaning to the cited authors. In order to achieve this objective, we underwent a bibliographic research, eliciting the word as an analytic category. First, we present a review of Charaudeau’s double semiotization process and communicative contract, taking into account both general and immediate alterity relationship regarding the selection of words in the utterance. Then, we review Volochinov’s proposition of the ideological nature of the sign as well as its specific mobility; theme and signification. Finally, we intertwine our discussion through the constructs of social representations and ideology, analyzing the status of form in the creation of meanings in face to the other.","PeriodicalId":285093,"journal":{"name":"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forma, sentido e alteridade apontamentos sobre o estatuto da palavra em Charaudeau e Volóchinov\",\"authors\":\"Eduardo da Silva Moll\",\"doi\":\"10.29327/210932.9.1-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The word attached to alterity and to the (co)production of meaning seems to be the touchstone of either Bakhtin and his Circle’s sociological method, and Patrick Charaudeau’s semiolinguistic approach. This paper’s objective is to discuss the relationship between alterity, form and meaning to the cited authors. In order to achieve this objective, we underwent a bibliographic research, eliciting the word as an analytic category. First, we present a review of Charaudeau’s double semiotization process and communicative contract, taking into account both general and immediate alterity relationship regarding the selection of words in the utterance. Then, we review Volochinov’s proposition of the ideological nature of the sign as well as its specific mobility; theme and signification. Finally, we intertwine our discussion through the constructs of social representations and ideology, analyzing the status of form in the creation of meanings in face to the other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":285093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29327/210932.9.1-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muiraquitã - Revista de Letras e Humanidades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29327/210932.9.1-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个词附属于另类和意义的(共同)生产,似乎是巴赫金和他的圈子的社会学方法,以及帕特里克·查劳多的半语言学方法的试金石。本文的目的是探讨被引作者的另类、形式和意义之间的关系。为了实现这一目标,我们进行了书目研究,引出了这个词作为一个分析范畴。首先,我们回顾了夏劳多的双重符号化过程和交际契约,考虑了话语中词语选择的一般和直接替代关系。然后,我们回顾了沃洛奇诺夫关于符号的意识形态性质及其特定流动性的命题;主题和意义。最后,我们通过社会表征和意识形态的构建将我们的讨论交织在一起,分析形式在面对他者的意义创造中的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forma, sentido e alteridade apontamentos sobre o estatuto da palavra em Charaudeau e Volóchinov
The word attached to alterity and to the (co)production of meaning seems to be the touchstone of either Bakhtin and his Circle’s sociological method, and Patrick Charaudeau’s semiolinguistic approach. This paper’s objective is to discuss the relationship between alterity, form and meaning to the cited authors. In order to achieve this objective, we underwent a bibliographic research, eliciting the word as an analytic category. First, we present a review of Charaudeau’s double semiotization process and communicative contract, taking into account both general and immediate alterity relationship regarding the selection of words in the utterance. Then, we review Volochinov’s proposition of the ideological nature of the sign as well as its specific mobility; theme and signification. Finally, we intertwine our discussion through the constructs of social representations and ideology, analyzing the status of form in the creation of meanings in face to the other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信