布局对UML类图理解的影响:一个对照实验

Bonita Sharif, Jonathan I. Maletic
{"title":"布局对UML类图理解的影响:一个对照实验","authors":"Bonita Sharif, Jonathan I. Maletic","doi":"10.1109/VISSOF.2009.5336430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The results of a controlled experiment assessing the effects of different layout strategies on the comprehension of UML class diagrams of two software systems is presented. Six different categories of software comprehension tasks, with varying degrees of difficulty, are used to assess the layouts. Each task consists of several questions aimed at measuring the comprehensibility of a layout. The study involved 45 participants of varied experience in software design and programming ability. A report on the quantitative analysis of accuracy, speed, confidence level and preference of solving the tasks is given. Results indicate that clustered layouts demonstrate significant improvement in subject accuracy and speed in solving the problems in a majority of tasks.","PeriodicalId":356387,"journal":{"name":"2009 5th IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of layout on the comprehension of UML class diagrams: A controlled experiment\",\"authors\":\"Bonita Sharif, Jonathan I. Maletic\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/VISSOF.2009.5336430\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The results of a controlled experiment assessing the effects of different layout strategies on the comprehension of UML class diagrams of two software systems is presented. Six different categories of software comprehension tasks, with varying degrees of difficulty, are used to assess the layouts. Each task consists of several questions aimed at measuring the comprehensibility of a layout. The study involved 45 participants of varied experience in software design and programming ability. A report on the quantitative analysis of accuracy, speed, confidence level and preference of solving the tasks is given. Results indicate that clustered layouts demonstrate significant improvement in subject accuracy and speed in solving the problems in a majority of tasks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356387,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2009 5th IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"29\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2009 5th IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/VISSOF.2009.5336430\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 5th IEEE International Workshop on Visualizing Software for Understanding and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/VISSOF.2009.5336430","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

摘要

本文给出了一个控制实验的结果,该实验评估了不同的布局策略对两个软件系统的UML类图理解的影响。六种不同类型的软件理解任务,具有不同程度的难度,被用来评估布局。每个任务由几个问题组成,旨在衡量布局的可理解性。这项研究涉及45名参与者,他们在软件设计和编程能力方面有不同的经验。给出了求解任务的准确性、速度、置信度和偏好度的定量分析报告。结果表明,在大多数任务中,聚类布局显著提高了受试者解决问题的准确性和速度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of layout on the comprehension of UML class diagrams: A controlled experiment
The results of a controlled experiment assessing the effects of different layout strategies on the comprehension of UML class diagrams of two software systems is presented. Six different categories of software comprehension tasks, with varying degrees of difficulty, are used to assess the layouts. Each task consists of several questions aimed at measuring the comprehensibility of a layout. The study involved 45 participants of varied experience in software design and programming ability. A report on the quantitative analysis of accuracy, speed, confidence level and preference of solving the tasks is given. Results indicate that clustered layouts demonstrate significant improvement in subject accuracy and speed in solving the problems in a majority of tasks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信