慈善筹款计划的设计:等额拨款或种子基金?

Ning Gong, Bruce D. Grundy
{"title":"慈善筹款计划的设计:等额拨款或种子基金?","authors":"Ning Gong, Bruce D. Grundy","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1103680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For a fixed large donation a matching scheme that simply uses a one-for-one match ratio can actually raise less money than a seed money scheme. But when the match ratio is chosen to reflect the characteristics of the small donor base so as to exhaust the large donor's willingness to give, matching schemes always raise more money and are preferred by both charities and large donors. However, when the large donor chooses the size of her donation, a conflict can arise. The large donor can prefer a smaller leadership gift and more reliance on small donor matching while the charity can prefer seed money.","PeriodicalId":235827,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Decision-Making in Organizations (Topic)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Design of Charitable Fund-Raising Schemes: Matching Grants or Seed Money?\",\"authors\":\"Ning Gong, Bruce D. Grundy\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1103680\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For a fixed large donation a matching scheme that simply uses a one-for-one match ratio can actually raise less money than a seed money scheme. But when the match ratio is chosen to reflect the characteristics of the small donor base so as to exhaust the large donor's willingness to give, matching schemes always raise more money and are preferred by both charities and large donors. However, when the large donor chooses the size of her donation, a conflict can arise. The large donor can prefer a smaller leadership gift and more reliance on small donor matching while the charity can prefer seed money.\",\"PeriodicalId\":235827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Decision-Making in Organizations (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Decision-Making in Organizations (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1103680\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Organizations & Markets: Decision-Making in Organizations (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1103680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

对于一笔固定的大额捐赠,一个简单使用一对一匹配比例的匹配计划实际上比种子资金计划筹集的资金要少。但是,当选择匹配比例以反映小捐助者群体的特点,从而耗尽大捐助者的捐赠意愿时,匹配方案总是能筹集到更多的资金,并且受到慈善机构和大捐助者的青睐。然而,当大捐赠者选择她的捐赠规模时,可能会出现冲突。大捐赠者可能更喜欢较小的领导礼物和更依赖小捐赠者匹配,而慈善机构可能更喜欢种子资金。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Design of Charitable Fund-Raising Schemes: Matching Grants or Seed Money?
For a fixed large donation a matching scheme that simply uses a one-for-one match ratio can actually raise less money than a seed money scheme. But when the match ratio is chosen to reflect the characteristics of the small donor base so as to exhaust the large donor's willingness to give, matching schemes always raise more money and are preferred by both charities and large donors. However, when the large donor chooses the size of her donation, a conflict can arise. The large donor can prefer a smaller leadership gift and more reliance on small donor matching while the charity can prefer seed money.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信