用于伪造文件验证的纹理描述符评估

Albert Berenguel Centeno, O. R. Terrades, Josep Lladós Canet, Cristina Cañero Morales
{"title":"用于伪造文件验证的纹理描述符评估","authors":"Albert Berenguel Centeno, O. R. Terrades, Josep Lladós Canet, Cristina Cañero Morales","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.2017.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an exhaustive comparative analysis and evaluation of different existing texture descriptor algorithms to differentiate between genuine and counterfeit documents. We include in our experiments different categories of algorithms and compare them in different scenarios with several counterfeit datasets, comprising banknotes and identity documents. Computational time in the extraction of each descriptor is important because the final objective is to use it in a real industrial scenario. HoG and CNN based descriptors stands out statistically over the rest in terms of the F1-score/time ratio performance.","PeriodicalId":433676,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Texture Descriptors for Validation of Counterfeit Documents\",\"authors\":\"Albert Berenguel Centeno, O. R. Terrades, Josep Lladós Canet, Cristina Cañero Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDAR.2017.204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes an exhaustive comparative analysis and evaluation of different existing texture descriptor algorithms to differentiate between genuine and counterfeit documents. We include in our experiments different categories of algorithms and compare them in different scenarios with several counterfeit datasets, comprising banknotes and identity documents. Computational time in the extraction of each descriptor is important because the final objective is to use it in a real industrial scenario. HoG and CNN based descriptors stands out statistically over the rest in terms of the F1-score/time ratio performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2017.204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2017.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文对现有的不同纹理描述符算法进行了详尽的比较分析和评估,以区分真伪文件。我们在实验中包含了不同类别的算法,并将它们在不同场景下与几个伪造数据集(包括纸币和身份文件)进行比较。提取每个描述符的计算时间很重要,因为最终目标是在实际工业场景中使用它。基于HoG和CNN的描述符在f1得分/时间比性能方面在统计上比其他描述符突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Texture Descriptors for Validation of Counterfeit Documents
This paper describes an exhaustive comparative analysis and evaluation of different existing texture descriptor algorithms to differentiate between genuine and counterfeit documents. We include in our experiments different categories of algorithms and compare them in different scenarios with several counterfeit datasets, comprising banknotes and identity documents. Computational time in the extraction of each descriptor is important because the final objective is to use it in a real industrial scenario. HoG and CNN based descriptors stands out statistically over the rest in terms of the F1-score/time ratio performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信