Albert Berenguel Centeno, O. R. Terrades, Josep Lladós Canet, Cristina Cañero Morales
{"title":"用于伪造文件验证的纹理描述符评估","authors":"Albert Berenguel Centeno, O. R. Terrades, Josep Lladós Canet, Cristina Cañero Morales","doi":"10.1109/ICDAR.2017.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes an exhaustive comparative analysis and evaluation of different existing texture descriptor algorithms to differentiate between genuine and counterfeit documents. We include in our experiments different categories of algorithms and compare them in different scenarios with several counterfeit datasets, comprising banknotes and identity documents. Computational time in the extraction of each descriptor is important because the final objective is to use it in a real industrial scenario. HoG and CNN based descriptors stands out statistically over the rest in terms of the F1-score/time ratio performance.","PeriodicalId":433676,"journal":{"name":"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Texture Descriptors for Validation of Counterfeit Documents\",\"authors\":\"Albert Berenguel Centeno, O. R. Terrades, Josep Lladós Canet, Cristina Cañero Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICDAR.2017.204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper describes an exhaustive comparative analysis and evaluation of different existing texture descriptor algorithms to differentiate between genuine and counterfeit documents. We include in our experiments different categories of algorithms and compare them in different scenarios with several counterfeit datasets, comprising banknotes and identity documents. Computational time in the extraction of each descriptor is important because the final objective is to use it in a real industrial scenario. HoG and CNN based descriptors stands out statistically over the rest in terms of the F1-score/time ratio performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":433676,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2017.204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAR.2017.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Texture Descriptors for Validation of Counterfeit Documents
This paper describes an exhaustive comparative analysis and evaluation of different existing texture descriptor algorithms to differentiate between genuine and counterfeit documents. We include in our experiments different categories of algorithms and compare them in different scenarios with several counterfeit datasets, comprising banknotes and identity documents. Computational time in the extraction of each descriptor is important because the final objective is to use it in a real industrial scenario. HoG and CNN based descriptors stands out statistically over the rest in terms of the F1-score/time ratio performance.