美国环保署对发电碳排放监管的争议

Jiaxun Cui
{"title":"美国环保署对发电碳排放监管的争议","authors":"Jiaxun Cui","doi":"10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3809","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2021, the case of West Virginia and other state governments against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) brought the Clean Air Act's carbon emissions regulations back into the public eye. The Supreme Court's decision in this lawsuit will have far-reaching implications for the Clean Air Act and the EPA, so the outcome of the lawsuit is being awaited. Therefore, this study focuses on the background of the lawsuit, a description of the law involved, and an assessment and prediction of the overall case. Moreover, it introduces the two different regulating plans regarding the interpretation of §7411(d) of the CAA, and proposes two solutions and discusses their feasibility. One suggestion is to increase EPA's authority over carbon emissions control. Another proposal is to limit EPA's control of carbon emissions to the fenceline. Since then, this paper has expressed a more favorable view of limiting EPA's rights based on analysis and trade-offs.","PeriodicalId":380947,"journal":{"name":"BCP Social Sciences & Humanities","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Controversy on EPA’s regulation on carbon emissions from electric generation\",\"authors\":\"Jiaxun Cui\",\"doi\":\"10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3809\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2021, the case of West Virginia and other state governments against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) brought the Clean Air Act's carbon emissions regulations back into the public eye. The Supreme Court's decision in this lawsuit will have far-reaching implications for the Clean Air Act and the EPA, so the outcome of the lawsuit is being awaited. Therefore, this study focuses on the background of the lawsuit, a description of the law involved, and an assessment and prediction of the overall case. Moreover, it introduces the two different regulating plans regarding the interpretation of §7411(d) of the CAA, and proposes two solutions and discusses their feasibility. One suggestion is to increase EPA's authority over carbon emissions control. Another proposal is to limit EPA's control of carbon emissions to the fenceline. Since then, this paper has expressed a more favorable view of limiting EPA's rights based on analysis and trade-offs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":380947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BCP Social Sciences & Humanities\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BCP Social Sciences & Humanities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3809\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BCP Social Sciences & Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v21i.3809","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2021年,西弗吉尼亚州和其他州政府反对美国环境保护署(EPA)的案件使《清洁空气法》的碳排放规定重新进入公众视野。最高法院在这起诉讼中的裁决将对《清洁空气法》和环保署产生深远的影响,因此诉讼的结果正在等待中。因此,本研究的重点是对诉讼的背景、涉及的法律进行描述,并对整个案件进行评估和预测。此外,介绍了对《民航法》第7411(d)条解释的两种不同的监管方案,提出了两种解决方案并讨论了其可行性。一项建议是增加环保局在碳排放控制方面的权力。另一项提议是限制环保局对围栏内碳排放的控制。从那时起,本文在分析和权衡的基础上表达了对限制EPA权利的更有利的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Controversy on EPA’s regulation on carbon emissions from electric generation
In 2021, the case of West Virginia and other state governments against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) brought the Clean Air Act's carbon emissions regulations back into the public eye. The Supreme Court's decision in this lawsuit will have far-reaching implications for the Clean Air Act and the EPA, so the outcome of the lawsuit is being awaited. Therefore, this study focuses on the background of the lawsuit, a description of the law involved, and an assessment and prediction of the overall case. Moreover, it introduces the two different regulating plans regarding the interpretation of §7411(d) of the CAA, and proposes two solutions and discusses their feasibility. One suggestion is to increase EPA's authority over carbon emissions control. Another proposal is to limit EPA's control of carbon emissions to the fenceline. Since then, this paper has expressed a more favorable view of limiting EPA's rights based on analysis and trade-offs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信