宪政:限制与许可

Turkuler Isiksel
{"title":"宪政:限制与许可","authors":"Turkuler Isiksel","doi":"10.1017/9781108679404.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the Anglo-American tradition, but certainly also beyond, constitutionalism is often associated with safeguarding a broad sphere of individual liberty against encroachment by public power. In his seventeenth-century manifesto against tyranny, John Locke famously depicted the sovereign as a fearsome lion, far more powerful than the petty varmints it was meant to control, and therefore ever-ready to devour them. Liberals continue to prize resilient institutional structures that conquer the authoritarian odds. Being constantly on guard against “the encroaching spirit of power,” they rejoice whenever sovereign power is “effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it.” In this sense, the purest function of a liberal constitution is thought to be bridling the sovereign’s prerogatives, firmly delineating the sphere of individual liberty in respect of which the state and its organs “shall make no law.”","PeriodicalId":240497,"journal":{"name":"Constitutions in Times of Financial Crisis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constitutionalism as Limitation and License\",\"authors\":\"Turkuler Isiksel\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/9781108679404.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the Anglo-American tradition, but certainly also beyond, constitutionalism is often associated with safeguarding a broad sphere of individual liberty against encroachment by public power. In his seventeenth-century manifesto against tyranny, John Locke famously depicted the sovereign as a fearsome lion, far more powerful than the petty varmints it was meant to control, and therefore ever-ready to devour them. Liberals continue to prize resilient institutional structures that conquer the authoritarian odds. Being constantly on guard against “the encroaching spirit of power,” they rejoice whenever sovereign power is “effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it.” In this sense, the purest function of a liberal constitution is thought to be bridling the sovereign’s prerogatives, firmly delineating the sphere of individual liberty in respect of which the state and its organs “shall make no law.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":240497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Constitutions in Times of Financial Crisis\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Constitutions in Times of Financial Crisis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108679404.010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Constitutions in Times of Financial Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108679404.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在英美传统中,当然也超越了英美传统,宪政通常与保护广泛的个人自由免受公共权力的侵犯联系在一起。在他17世纪反对暴政的宣言中,约翰·洛克(John Locke)将君主描绘成一只可怕的狮子,远比它所要控制的小恶棍强大得多,因此随时准备吞噬他们。自由主义者继续推崇能够战胜威权统治的弹性制度结构。他们时刻警惕着“权力的侵蚀精神”,每当主权权力“被有效地限制在指定的界限之外”时,他们就会感到高兴。从这个意义上说,自由宪法最纯粹的功能被认为是约束君主的特权,坚定地划定个人自由的范围,而国家及其机关“不得制定法律”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Constitutionalism as Limitation and License
In the Anglo-American tradition, but certainly also beyond, constitutionalism is often associated with safeguarding a broad sphere of individual liberty against encroachment by public power. In his seventeenth-century manifesto against tyranny, John Locke famously depicted the sovereign as a fearsome lion, far more powerful than the petty varmints it was meant to control, and therefore ever-ready to devour them. Liberals continue to prize resilient institutional structures that conquer the authoritarian odds. Being constantly on guard against “the encroaching spirit of power,” they rejoice whenever sovereign power is “effectually restrained from passing the limits assigned to it.” In this sense, the purest function of a liberal constitution is thought to be bridling the sovereign’s prerogatives, firmly delineating the sphere of individual liberty in respect of which the state and its organs “shall make no law.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信