Razia Shabana
{"title":"استشراقی فکر:سرسید احمد خان اور ابوالکلام آزاد کے نقطۂ نظر کا جائزہ","authors":"Razia Shabana","doi":"10.52541/fn.v58i4.1243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most consequential byproducts of Colonialism was the rise of Orientalism. The Orientalists, almost all of whom were Christians and Jews, studied the cultures of the Orient, bringing their own cultural baggage in the process. Needless to say, this generated a variety of responses from the insiders of those cultures. In the Indian subcontinent, Sir Sayyid Aḥmad Khān was one of the first Muslim scholars who critically analyzed and responded to the works of Orientalists on the Sīrah of the Prophet (P.B.U.H.) through his book al-Khuṭbāt al-Aḥmadiyyah. Another prominent scholar of the Indian subcontinent is Abū’l-Kalām Āzād. This paper examines the understanding of these two scholars of the Orientalist scholarship on Islam and compares their responses to it.","PeriodicalId":159571,"journal":{"name":"FIKR-O NAZAR فکر ونظر","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FIKR-O NAZAR فکر ونظر","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52541/fn.v58i4.1243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

殖民主义最重要的副产品之一是东方主义的兴起。东方学家几乎都是基督徒和犹太人,他们研究东方文化,在这个过程中带着自己的文化包袱。不用说,这在这些文化的内部人士中产生了各种各样的反应。在印度次大陆,赛义德爵士Aḥmad Khān是最早通过其著作al-Khuṭbāt al-Aḥmadiyyah批判性地分析和回应东方学家关于先知的圣训(P.B.U.H.)的著作的穆斯林学者之一。另一位研究印度次大陆的杰出学者是abi ' l-Kalām Āzād。本文考察了这两位东方学学者对伊斯兰教的认识,并比较了他们对此的回应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
استشراقی فکر:سرسید احمد خان اور ابوالکلام آزاد کے نقطۂ نظر کا جائزہ
One of the most consequential byproducts of Colonialism was the rise of Orientalism. The Orientalists, almost all of whom were Christians and Jews, studied the cultures of the Orient, bringing their own cultural baggage in the process. Needless to say, this generated a variety of responses from the insiders of those cultures. In the Indian subcontinent, Sir Sayyid Aḥmad Khān was one of the first Muslim scholars who critically analyzed and responded to the works of Orientalists on the Sīrah of the Prophet (P.B.U.H.) through his book al-Khuṭbāt al-Aḥmadiyyah. Another prominent scholar of the Indian subcontinent is Abū’l-Kalām Āzād. This paper examines the understanding of these two scholars of the Orientalist scholarship on Islam and compares their responses to it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信