《even’s Time》的现象学解读

Zihao Liu
{"title":"《even’s Time》的现象学解读","authors":"Zihao Liu","doi":"10.1353/nab.2022.a901982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:To establish The Texture of Time as a notable philosophical achievement, this essay puts it in the context of transcendental phenomenology and elucidates \"Veen's Time\" by way of comparison to Husserl's theory of time-consciousness. Despite Nabokov's apparent disinterest in phenomenology, the monist stance, descriptive method and de facto epoché in The Texture of Time all point to it being a piece of phenomenological analysis. Veen's conception of the Present as a hollow is analogous to Husserl's notion of the absolute flow of time-constituting consciousness; by emphasizing the stillness of the Present, Veen even irons out a couple of rough edges in Husserl's account. The Past is not a mere extension of the Present, but an equally important panel of \"Veen's Time\" with its own structure that centers on the subject and the object as two identity poles. Finally, drawing on the concept of \"protention,\" the future-facing element of the Present, Veen's dismissal of the Future as \"a quack at the court of Chronos\" is interpreted as attacking the conventional tripartite image of Time instead of the Future per se.","PeriodicalId":110136,"journal":{"name":"Nabokov Studies","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Phenomenological Interpretation of \\\"Veen's Time\\\"\",\"authors\":\"Zihao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/nab.2022.a901982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:To establish The Texture of Time as a notable philosophical achievement, this essay puts it in the context of transcendental phenomenology and elucidates \\\"Veen's Time\\\" by way of comparison to Husserl's theory of time-consciousness. Despite Nabokov's apparent disinterest in phenomenology, the monist stance, descriptive method and de facto epoché in The Texture of Time all point to it being a piece of phenomenological analysis. Veen's conception of the Present as a hollow is analogous to Husserl's notion of the absolute flow of time-constituting consciousness; by emphasizing the stillness of the Present, Veen even irons out a couple of rough edges in Husserl's account. The Past is not a mere extension of the Present, but an equally important panel of \\\"Veen's Time\\\" with its own structure that centers on the subject and the object as two identity poles. Finally, drawing on the concept of \\\"protention,\\\" the future-facing element of the Present, Veen's dismissal of the Future as \\\"a quack at the court of Chronos\\\" is interpreted as attacking the conventional tripartite image of Time instead of the Future per se.\",\"PeriodicalId\":110136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nabokov Studies\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nabokov Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2022.a901982\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nabokov Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/nab.2022.a901982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文将《时间的结构》置于先验现象学的语境中,通过与胡塞尔的时间意识理论的比较,对《维恩的时间》进行阐释,以确立《时间的结构》是一项值得关注的哲学成就。尽管纳博科夫显然对现象学不感兴趣,但《时间的质感》中的一元论立场、描述方法和事实上的时代变迁都表明它是一部现象学分析。维恩认为现在是一个空洞的概念类似于胡塞尔关于时间构成意识的绝对流动的概念;通过强调现在的静止,even甚至消除了胡塞尔叙述中的一些粗糙的边缘。“过去”不仅仅是“现在”的延伸,而是一个同样重要的“维恩的时间”面板,它有自己的结构,以主体和客体为中心,作为两个身份极点。最后,利用“保护”的概念,即“现在”面向未来的元素,维恩将“未来”斥为“克罗诺斯宫廷中的庸医”,这被解释为攻击传统的三方时间形象,而不是未来本身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Phenomenological Interpretation of "Veen's Time"
Abstract:To establish The Texture of Time as a notable philosophical achievement, this essay puts it in the context of transcendental phenomenology and elucidates "Veen's Time" by way of comparison to Husserl's theory of time-consciousness. Despite Nabokov's apparent disinterest in phenomenology, the monist stance, descriptive method and de facto epoché in The Texture of Time all point to it being a piece of phenomenological analysis. Veen's conception of the Present as a hollow is analogous to Husserl's notion of the absolute flow of time-constituting consciousness; by emphasizing the stillness of the Present, Veen even irons out a couple of rough edges in Husserl's account. The Past is not a mere extension of the Present, but an equally important panel of "Veen's Time" with its own structure that centers on the subject and the object as two identity poles. Finally, drawing on the concept of "protention," the future-facing element of the Present, Veen's dismissal of the Future as "a quack at the court of Chronos" is interpreted as attacking the conventional tripartite image of Time instead of the Future per se.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信