{"title":"基于语音和非语音片段的说话人验证重放攻击检测","authors":"Ananda Garin Mills, Patthranit Kaewcharuay, Pannathorn Sathirasattayanon, Suradej Duangpummet, Kasorn Galajit, Jessada Karnjana, P. Aimmanee","doi":"10.23919/APSIPAASC55919.2022.9980225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Voice can represent a person's identity. Thus, it can be used in automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems for authenticating secure applications. Unfortunately, existing ASV systems are vulnerable to spoofing attacks. A replay attack is a widely used spoofing technique because it is simple but difficult to detect. Hence, many methods are proposed for countermeasures against replay attacks. Most work inseparably considers voice and non-voice sections in the detection's performance. In this work, we investigate the spoof detection performances when the voice, non-voice, and both with different percentages of voice are used to obtain the optimal section. We also propose a method for detecting replay attacks using the optimal section of a signal. Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients are calculated from the optimal section as a feature, and the ResNet-34 model is used for classification. We evaluated the proposed method using a dataset from the ASVspoof 2019 challenge. The results depict that the optimal section for replay attack detection is when 10% and 20% of voice are included in the non-voice sections. It also showed that the proposed method outperforms the baselines with a 7.52% relatively improvement or an equal error rate of 1.72%.","PeriodicalId":382967,"journal":{"name":"2022 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Replay Attack Detection Based on Voice and Non-voice Sections for Speaker Verification\",\"authors\":\"Ananda Garin Mills, Patthranit Kaewcharuay, Pannathorn Sathirasattayanon, Suradej Duangpummet, Kasorn Galajit, Jessada Karnjana, P. Aimmanee\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/APSIPAASC55919.2022.9980225\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Voice can represent a person's identity. Thus, it can be used in automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems for authenticating secure applications. Unfortunately, existing ASV systems are vulnerable to spoofing attacks. A replay attack is a widely used spoofing technique because it is simple but difficult to detect. Hence, many methods are proposed for countermeasures against replay attacks. Most work inseparably considers voice and non-voice sections in the detection's performance. In this work, we investigate the spoof detection performances when the voice, non-voice, and both with different percentages of voice are used to obtain the optimal section. We also propose a method for detecting replay attacks using the optimal section of a signal. Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients are calculated from the optimal section as a feature, and the ResNet-34 model is used for classification. We evaluated the proposed method using a dataset from the ASVspoof 2019 challenge. The results depict that the optimal section for replay attack detection is when 10% and 20% of voice are included in the non-voice sections. It also showed that the proposed method outperforms the baselines with a 7.52% relatively improvement or an equal error rate of 1.72%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/APSIPAASC55919.2022.9980225\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/APSIPAASC55919.2022.9980225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Replay Attack Detection Based on Voice and Non-voice Sections for Speaker Verification
Voice can represent a person's identity. Thus, it can be used in automatic speaker verification (ASV) systems for authenticating secure applications. Unfortunately, existing ASV systems are vulnerable to spoofing attacks. A replay attack is a widely used spoofing technique because it is simple but difficult to detect. Hence, many methods are proposed for countermeasures against replay attacks. Most work inseparably considers voice and non-voice sections in the detection's performance. In this work, we investigate the spoof detection performances when the voice, non-voice, and both with different percentages of voice are used to obtain the optimal section. We also propose a method for detecting replay attacks using the optimal section of a signal. Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients are calculated from the optimal section as a feature, and the ResNet-34 model is used for classification. We evaluated the proposed method using a dataset from the ASVspoof 2019 challenge. The results depict that the optimal section for replay attack detection is when 10% and 20% of voice are included in the non-voice sections. It also showed that the proposed method outperforms the baselines with a 7.52% relatively improvement or an equal error rate of 1.72%.